Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Electoral Commission Response to High Court Decision
Electoral Commission Response to High Court Decision 8 September 2014
The High Court in Wellington has today
released a judgment in two cases filed concerning decisions
of the Electoral Commission (Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc &
Ors v Electoral Commission CIV-2014-485-8997) and
(Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc v Electoral Commission
CIV-2014-485-8998).
In the first case, Greenpeace and others were seeking a statutory declaration that the Climate Voter website was not an election advertisement under section 3A of the Electoral Act 1993. The Court rejected Greenpeace’s arguments and said that the website that the Electoral Commission considered when providing its advisory opinion was an election advertisement for the purposes of the Electoral Act.
In the second case, regarding a Greenpeace website criticising Simon Bridges, the Court has declared that the website was not an election advertisement as it related to his role as Minister of Energy and could not reasonably be regarded as encouraging or persuading people not to vote for a candidate or party.
The Electoral Commission will need to carefully consider the judgment and discuss the implications of the decision further with Greenpeace and others.
No further comment will be made while the judgment is under consideration.
ends
Gordon Campbell: On Why We Can’t Survive Two More Years Of This
Waikato Regional Council: Studies Open Door To Mercury Islands Underwater World
Office of the Privacy Commissioner: Christmas Is About Giving, But Don’t Give Up Your Privacy
The Rail Advocacy Collective: Chris Trotter - Running Us Off The Rails
Natural Hazards Commission: More Landslide Claims Than Ever; NHC Encourages Homeowners To Get Prepared
Te Ara Ahunga Ora Retirement Commission: What Does Retirement Really Look Like In 2024? New Research Highlights The Financial Struggles Of Over 65s
E tū: Minimum Wage Announcement “A Pay Cut For The Most Vulnerable”
