Lisa Owen interviews Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei
Lisa Owen interviews Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei
Turei says new male co-leader won't
lead to any radical changes in direction for the
party Commits to staying on as co-leader for the 2017
general election
A few minutes ago, I
spoke to Metiria Turei and asked her, with Norman gone, is
this an opportunity for a change in
direction?
We are absolutely moving forward
with the change of co-leadership this weekend, and we’re
really looking forward to having the new guy working
alongside me and working with the caucus and with the party
and focus, actually, very much on the 2017 election. Russel
will stay as an MP, and the caucus priorities will remain
– inequality and climate change. The party commitment to
working on the ground with communities remains. So although
we’ll have a new co-leader, much of our approach to issues
will continue the same. It’s the party that makes all our
important political decisions too, rather than the
leadership or the caucus, so I think that’s important to
note.
So steady as she goes is the attitude
you’re taking?
We’ll, I think we’ll
see who the new guy is and what changes he might want to
make to our direction. But we work collaboratively with our
caucus and with our party in making these decisions, so you
won’t see any radical shifts in direction. But we will be
moving forward towards the 2017 election with fresh blood,
with new ideas, but we’ll take a little time to work all
those through.
Well, you said it depends on
what the new guy thinks, so you’re open to a change in
direction?
Oh, absolutely. We’re open to
what a new co-leader will bring to our caucus and to our
party. It’s a very exciting time for us. We don’t change
leaders very often, compared to some other parties, and so
it’s always good to have someone new, with new ideas about
where we should be going and how we should be opening our
relationships and the kinds of solutions we should be
putting forward to the public.
We’ll talk a
little bit about that later – the relationships – but
you said this week that you want a running mate who
understands that leadership is about forging a new
direction, so what did you mean by
that?
Both a new direction, because, of
course, a new person in this role is going to have new ideas
about things they might want to change, but also that
leadership is about service – service to our members and
service to our voters. So although a person— the new guy
is going to have great ideas about things we should be
doing, but we also need to be respectful of our membership
and what they want to do, because they are the ones that we
serve, and our voters and what they want to see us doing. So
it’s a relationship that you build, rather than changing
direction or making—
Okay, can you afford
not to change direction? Can you get 15% of the vote without
changing direction?
We have been
fantastically successful, and, in fact, Russel and I have
been one of the most successful political partnerships now
for a number of years. We’ve led the Greens over two
elections to over 10% of the party.
Yes, but
you’ve also had nine elections where you’re not part of
the government at the end of the day.
And we
have worked really hard with other parties to try to form
this idea of a government in waiting, and we will try to do
that again for 2017. But in terms of the work that the Green
Party does, putting solutions to the public, making sure
that we have good relationships across the political
spectrum, Russel and I in particular have done a great deal
of work in that, and it’s been successful. The Green Party
is very successful. We’re the only party other than
National and Labour to achieve other 10% of the party vote
in two elections running. So I think the Greens are doing
really well.
But you’re still not in
government, and isn’t one of the lessons from the last
election that you have maxed out your vote on this
road?
Not at all.
You’ve
said that you’ve raised more money than Labour last
election; you had the highest record of membership. You
played nice; you didn’t make 15%. If you do the same,
won’t you just get the same? That’s it; you’ve maxed
it out.
We set an audacious target so that
we work really hard to achieve it. And although we didn’t
hit the target, we did have more members, more voters and
raise more money at the last election than ever before. This
is two elections in a row where we’ve hit over the 10%
mark. So I think we’re on a trajectory of growth,
absolutely. And with the new co-leadership team focused on
2017, I think we will continue to grow. That’s why this
time is so exciting for us.
But the evidence
doesn't seem to suggest that you are on a trajectory for
growth, because you have about the same result both times,
both elections.
So we've been in Parliament
now for nearly 20 years, and it's only been in the last two
elections that we have achieved over 10% of the vote. I
think that shows that we are both stable and here for the
long-term as a third political force in New Zealand
politics, that we have the capacity to grow significantly
more, and that with a new co-leadership team focused on 2017
that we will.
Some people might see that as
being stuck in a rut — not moving, same
spot.
Moving forward, growing our vote,
growing our membership, raising more money, these are all...
this is all about momentum, and we have great momentum as a
party. The last few months have been focused on ourselves,
with our co-leadership, and I think that's been important.
Today we elect a new co-leader, a new co-leadership team,
and we will move forward from here. There is only... I think
there's only room for growth for us at this
point.
When you talk about moving forward,
well, Labour learned some hard lessons at the last election.
After bombing at the polls, it started to ditch unpopular
policy. So what policies do you think that the Greens need
to flick?
I don't think we need to flick
any, and I think what we now need to do with the new
co-leadership team is we will look at our priorities, which
at the moment are climate change and inequality, and we've
proven really successful in putting those issues on the
political agenda up to this point, and so building on the
success that we've created so in our momentum towards 2017.
And National would not have raised benefits if there had not
been a strong political voice from the Greens on child
poverty time after time. A persistent strong voice,
particularly in the election campaign. We
continue—
But the thing is you don't look
like you're listening to the electorate. You don't look like
you're listening to the electorate because your vote is
stuck around a certain amount. You say you don't need to
flick any policies and you don't need any major changes in
direction. Are you ignoring what the electorate is telling
you?
Well, the electorate is— The
electorate is telling us that we are successful. More people
voted for us at the last election than ever before. We've
only been in Parliament for less than 20 years, and we are
already cemented as the third-largest party. Of all of those
parties that were involved in the alliance, we are the only
ones still here, and we are
growing.
Third-largest party which is on the
outside, on the periphery, not making the decision, not in
power.
But that's not true. I mean, when we
were... When Labour was in government, we had great success
with them, including significant budget successes with them.
When— Now that National is in government, we've done the
same through our MOU. So we've gotten our policy through
with both Labour and National in different kinds of ways,
and we are growing, and we are cementing ourselves in New
Zealand politics. The future for the Greens is only success
and growth at this stage, and with the new co-leadership
team, I think we've got infinite possibilities for how we
want to extend that growth.
Okay, in your
speech, you say that in the past, people have looked and
thought... And this is your words. 'What would a bunch of
hippies and treaty activists know about the economy?' Is
that the problem? That people still see you that way, and
without Russel, they are going to perceive you like
that?
No, you've taken that quote totally
out of context in the speech—
It's how you
say people used to see you, but I'm suggesting to you that
perhaps that's the way they still see you, and that might be
your problem.
No, it’s not. That’s the
point – and you will hear more in the speech if you quote
more of it – is that actually our ideas on the economy,
our capital gains tax, has been taken up by National;
we’ve campaigned so hard for child poverty and raising
benefits – that’s been taken up by National. Even Labour
has taken our policy ideas, as we saw with capital gains tax
as well. We are the thought leaders inside the Parliament,
and other parties are taking our policy ideas, because they
are tired and struggling to find their own. Now, you know,
we welcome that. Please, take our ideas. Put them into
place. But there is no doubt that the Greens are the ones
who are leading on these issues.
OK, well,
when it comes to Labour and your relationship with Labour,
do you want Labour’s vote to grow or do you want their
votes to come to you? What would be the best thing for the
Greens?
Well, we always are going to be in
competition and cooperation with Labour around votes, and
that’s just the way it is. In an election campaign, I want
as many votes as possible, and I don’t care where they
come from – Labour, National, from other parties. We want
to make sure our ideas— we sell our ideas really well to
the public and that the public want those ideas put in
place, either in government or in a relationship with
government.
Yeah, but where do you think those
votes will come from? Where is the growth market for
you?
We get votes from both Labour and
National. Some elections, it’s quite a similar percentage,
and some elections it’s different. But we know that we can
get votes from across the political spectrum. That’s what
our evidence shows us. And we welcome that, because our
ideas for combating child poverty and inequality, for
protecting the environment, for smart, green economics –
these are ideas that cross the political
divide.
OK, well, if they cross the political
divide, then isn’t the problem with the Greens declaring
that they would work only with Labour and not National? I
mean, no one really has to fight for your affections.
You’ve got no leverage, no power.
No, what
we said is that we’d be more likely to form a coalition
relationship with Labour than with National but that we
could work across the political spectrum, and we have proven
that to be the case. The only reason
why—
Policy by policy. But on the
outside?
Well, we haven’t been in a
government relationship – that’s true. And we are
looking forward to that. And I expect that in the next
co-leader— male co-leader’s term that we will be in a
governing relationship at some point. I’m really looking
forward to that challenge. I think that’s going to be a
fantastic new step up for the Greens. But in the meantime,
we have got our policies through, and that’s the most
important thing.
But having identified that as
your biggest goal—
It’s a great
goal.
New Zealand First has been bolstered by the
win in the Northland by-election. They’re in the centre,
where politics are won and lost. So why would Labour choose
you, the Greens, over New Zealand First?
Labour
knows that the Greens are the growing political force on the
left of centre and that they will not govern without us. So
they’re coming to terms with that, I think. I’m not
worried about—
They can govern without
you.
They can’t.
They can if
they choose Winston Peters. And Winston Peters has made it
clear that he doesn’t want a bar of the
Greens.
No, that’s not true either. You
know, that’s an old thing from, like, 10 years ago. I
mean, that’s ancient. No, Winston and the Greens, we work
quite well together, actually, and we’ve got a lot of
common policy.
So are you making nice with
Winston Peters? Are you fostering that
relationship?
We’ve been managing a
relationship with Winston Peters for years now and with
Labour and others.
No, but are you actively
fostering it now with Winston Peters, a
relationship?
We’ve worked together with
him on the manufacturing inquiry in the last term. We work
really well with a number of the MPs, including Tracey
Martin. I talk with Winston. We are very
committed—
So can you talk him into a
coalition that involves—?
Nobody can talk
Winston into anything. Let’s be really clear about
that.
You can’t talk him into a coalition
with the Greens, then?
The best thing we can
do is make sure we have good relationships with Labour and
New Zealand First and National, where we can, and other
parties and put solutions— our green solutions to the
public so that they vote for them so we have the strength in
an election to be able to negotiate well. That’s the
best— that’s what we need to focus on, and I think
that’s what the new co-leadership team
will.
All right. Metiria Turei, thanks for
joining me this morning. But just before we go, how long are
you committed to being a leader in the Greens
party?
I will certainly be here for the next
election.
All right. Thank
you.
Kia
ora.
ENDS