Corruption Free? - NZ drops again
Media Release
Corruption Free? - NZ
drops again
New Zealand has fallen to fourth place in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). This is its second consecutive drop in a survey it has previously topped 7 times because of the corruption-free reputation of its public sector.
"Our government must act immediately to reestablish New Zealand's stand-out reputation for a trusted public sector". says Transparency International New Zealand Chair, Suzanne Snively. "New Zealand trades on its corruption free reputation."
"There
are steps that can be taken immediately to reestablish New
Zealand's exemplary reputation for a trusted public sector"
says Snively. "through this, New Zealanders can gain greater
returns from all the different things they do - teaching,
farming, fishing, tourism, film, sport - because of our
country's reputation for integrity."
The CPI is produced
each year to highlight the global importance of
transparency. Dropping to fourth place has huge
disadvantages for New Zealand, both from a governing and
economic perspective.
Denmark, Finland and Sweden are now perceived to have the least corrupt public sectors. New Zealand which was ranked number one in both the 2012 and 2013 surveys, fell behind Denmark in the 2014 CPI and then Sweden and Finland as well in the just-released 2015 survey.
Further downgrades in New Zealand's scores are likely if areas such as access to information and governance of the environment fail to keep pace with the trends in northern European countries.
"A clean reputation makes us attractive to do business with and secures qualified migrants and confident tourists. New Zealand's high ranking on the TI-CPI is a factor that gives this credibility. The fall in score and rank is a wake-up call to the Government and Public Sector. Only when we make corruption prevention routine and comprehensive can we move ahead of the northern European countries and reclaim a number1 ranking," adds Snively.
She continues, "With a commitment to a reputation for the world's highest integrity, the Government has an opportunity to take a strong leadership role in inspiring businesses and communities to build on the value integrity brings to creating a more prosperous society."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
information for journalists
1. [contact removed]
2. Transparency
International
Transparency International is a
global civil society coalition leading the fight against
corruption. It compiles a number of measures of different
aspects of corruption including the Corruption Perceptions
Index, the Global Corruption Barometer, and the Bribe Payers
Index. Information on Transparency International can be
found at www.transparency.org and detailed information on
the Corruption Perceptions Index can be found
atwww.transparency.org/cpi.
3 The Corruption
Perceptions Index
The CPI scores and ranks 168
countries/territories based on how corrupt a country's
public sector is perceived to be. It is a composite index, a
combination of surveys and assessments of corruption,
collected by a variety of reputable institutions. The CPI is
the most widely used indicator of corruption
worldwide.
Top performers share key characteristics: high levels of press freedom; access to budget information so the public knows where money comes from and how it is spent; high levels of integrity among people in power; and judiciaries that don't differentiate between rich and poor, and that are truly independent from other parts of government.
4. About
TINZ
Transparency International New Zealand
(TINZ) is the local chapter of the global organisation -
http://www.transparency.org.nz/. TINZ works to actively
promote the highest levels of transparency, accountability,
integrity and public participation in government and civil
society in New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.
Transparency International New Zealand provides a free
Anti-Corruption Training Tooldesigned by
leading experts in the field, and enables organisations to
provide training for their personnel. This was developed in
partnership with the Serious Fraud Office and BusinessNZ
Transparency International New Zealand published the Integrity Plus 2013 New Zealand National
Integrity System Assessment and is actively engaged in
the implementation of its recommendations.
5.
New Zealand's recent rankings:
2012 Rank No 1
Score 90
2013 Rank No 1 Score 91
2014 Rank No 2 Score
91
2015 Rank No 4 Score 88
6. CPI Documents
from Transparency International
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015
report
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 TI Media
Release
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 frequently
asked questions
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015
data
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 data
sources
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 Heat
Map
7. Areas of assessment where
New Zealand can monitor its scores and improve
include:
• Access to Information
• Order and
Security
• Fundamental Rights and Civil
Justice
• Lack of Constraints on Government Powers and
Criminal Justice
• Absence of
Corruption
• Regulatory Enforcement
• Open
Government.
8. Latency in the
Process
Events that occurred or were reported in
late 2015 may not be reflected in New Zealand's CPI ranking
until the 2016 CPI. This is because our CPI scores were
compiled from seven reputable data sources, each with a
specific timeframe and latency.
9.
Australia
Australia's score fell from 80 to 79
and its ranking fell from 11 to 13. The bottom two rankings
in the 2015 CPI were North Korea and Somalia.
10.
Asia Pacific CPI
Srirak Plipat, Transparency
International Director for Asia Pacific, noted in the CPI
report, "If there was one common challenge to unite the Asia
Pacific region, it would be corruption. From campaign
pledges to media coverage to civil society forums,
corruption dominates discussion. Yet despite all this talk,
there's little sign of action. Between Australia's slipping
scores and North Korea's predictably disastrous performance,
this year's index shows nosignificant improvement. Has Asia
Pacific stalled in its efforts to fight
corruption?