"Tax Haven" structures risk damage to well bing
6 April 2016
Transparency International New Zealand
Wellington New Zealand
Patron: Sir Don McKinnon
Media Release
"Tax Haven" structures risk damage to New Zealanders' well being
Transparency International New Zealand (TINZ) has been warning the government about weaknesses in corporate ownership and trust legislation for over fifteen years. The Integrity Plus 2013 New Zealand National Integrity System Assessment(NIS) clearly described the concerns. It also recommended straight-forward improvements to Trust structures which to date have been ignored, according to TINZ Chair Suzanne Snively. These loopholes allow people to hide money gained through crime and/or money laundering using Trusts registered in New Zealand.
The Panama Papers are an unprecedented leak of 11.5 million files from the world's 4th biggest offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca. They indicate that weaknesses in New Zealand business ownership structures are being exploited.
According to The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) who analysed the document trove, Mossack Fonseca's services have been used to "facilitate massive money laundering, tax avoidance and criminal activity, including drugs and arms dealing". New Zealand is named by the ICIJ as a "tax haven" used by Mossack Fonseca. According to reports, New Zealand is mentioned over 60,000 times in the documents.
The 2013 NIS analysed good business practice and then looked at the causes and the extent of possible corruption.
It noted that the creation of a new company in New Zealand is simple, low cost and can be completed in 30 minutes online. This is a positive competitive advantage designed to attract good business to our shores.
Related to this current tax haven scandal the NIS also reported that there is:
• no
requirement for permission to register or operate a private
company in New Zealand, opening the door to criminal
behaviour
•
• a lack of requirement for companies
to identify their beneficial owners
•
• no trust
registry and weak controls on trusts, allowing them to hide
beneficial owners, bank accounts and other property which in
many cases is not held in New Zealand.
•
"We have
repeatedly warned that these factors are being exploited by
overseas interests. They are setting up shell companies and
trusts for those involved in corrupt and illegal activities,
including tax evasion and money laundering." says Snively.
"The recent amendment to the Companies Act of 1993, while
strengthening requirements to have a New Zealand Director,
fails to require companies to identify all their beneficial
owners".
She further notes that Trusts in New Zealand often do not come to the attention of tax authorities or law enforcement agencies because there is no transparent mechanism for reporting them. They have no presence in measurements of funds held in New Zealand and are often hidden in solicitors' trust accounts.
"The picture of New Zealand that emerges from the Panama Papers is another huge blow to its reputation as one of the least corrupt countries in the world," says Snively. "New Zealand's trade - essential to our prosperity and the well being of our country's residents - relies on our reputation for integrity".
"Immediate and substantial action must be taken by the Government to demonstrate world leadership in restricting the flow of ill-gotten funds and assets".
ends