The Nation: Gower interviews Winston Peters
On The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews Winston
Peters
Youtube clips from the show
are available here.
Headlines:
Winston Peters says 300 foreign students caught up in the closure of their International school in Auckland should be allowed to stay in this country, because it’s fraudulent immigration agents who are to blame.
Peters says Tertiary Education Minister Steven Joyce should be fired over the issue, but he won’t rule out working with him in government after the next election.
Peters says the new New Zealand People’s Party is a front for the National Party, set up to split the vote in the Mt Roskill electorate.
Patrick Gower: Now,
on our latest poll, New Zealand First had 8% of the vote and
it would have meant that at the next election, Winston
Peters may yet again be the so-called kingmaker; he would
decide the government. But apart from that long-held view of
his that immigration needs to be cut, what else does the New
Zealand First party stand for? And what will Winston’s
bargaining positions be? He joins me now from his party’s
annual conference in Dunedin. And, Winston Peters, starting
with Steven Joyce, what do you think of his handling of
international education and handling of the student visa
issues? What should happen?
Winston
Peters: Well, look, what you’ve just seen would be
absolutely risible or laughable if it weren’t so serious.
He didn’t know half the facts and then he knew all the
facts and then he got confused as to who was an immigrant.
He had overseas students being immigrants, he had tourists
being immigrants, and he was an absolute mishmash of
misinformation. And at the end of the day, New Zealanders
must surely understand that the reputation of their country,
which now appears in newspapers in New York, has been
seriously tarnished when it comes to
education.
And what should happen to Steven
Joyce as minister? You’ve said publicly this morning,
actually, that he should be fired. Do
you--?
Well, you know, in 2012, we
were the ones who raised the fraud that was coming out of
Chinese student applications, not Mr Joyce; New Zealand
First did. And on the rest, we’re the party that’s got
authenticity on this matter, not coat-tailing it like some
other parties are now. In 2012, as a consequence the Chinese
did pull back, and then we had export education in this
country in trouble, not getting enough students because we
can’t compete against the best out of Canada, the UK,
Australia and the USA. And so they – Mr Key and Mr Joyce
– decided that they’d offer an incentive. We’d give
them a right to work 20 hours a week – that is, earn their
income in New Zealand to pay for their education in New
Zealand – and we’d give them – many of them – a
pathway to citizenship. Those were the two incentives. And
so here comes the scam. Now they’ve got a serious reason
to start committing fraud.
So what should
happen to Steven Joyce?
Well, Steven
Joyce should have been fired a long, long time ago. How many
times can you screw up and go on TV in a mass case of spin
and misinformation and get away with it? I
mean—
So he should be
sacked?
He was going to be Mr Fix-It.
No, no—On Novopay, he never fixed it.
So
should he be fired as minister or not? Should he be fired as
minister over this or not?
Well, of
course. Look, when you see wholesale fraud going on and that
has been condoned by the minister and encouraged by the
minister – even though he says otherwise now – of course
he should have been fired, but a long time
ago.
So what would happen then in this
scenario where you hold the balance of power? Would you
allow Steven Joyce to be a Minister of Tertiary Education in
any government that you had to be part
of?
Look, Paddy, you and your media
colleagues don’t get it. It is not the balance of power
that New Zealand First wants. What New Zealand First wants
is a dramatic economic and social change in this country,
not the kind of thing you just saw on your programme where
this country’s reputation has been tarnished, a country
with first-world rights has seen people be abused,
misused—
Okay. Okay, save this speech. Save
this speech for your conference and come back to will you
happily sit alongside Steven Joyce on the government
benches, or is this just a load of
talk?
I’m going to preface this
speech like every speech I’m going to give from the last
12 months—
But what I’m saying to you, Mr
Peters, is that you can’t say, ‘Oh, Steven Joyce should
be fired,’ and then in 12 months’ time go and sit with
him on the government benches. Give people an undertaking
now that he won’t be there or else you are, quite frankly,
all talk.
Well, I’ll give you an
undertaking right now. How could somebody with any
self-respect and integrity like Mr Joyce stay around when he
knows he faces a colleague in Cabinet like Winston Peters of
New Zealand First? He knows what he’s been doing is
diametrically opposed to the nation’s interests and I
don’t see him being there in 12 months’ time, but you
guys might.
But this is the whole
point.
You’re talking about a guy
who’s never won a seat.
But this is the
whole point.
No, sorry,
Paddy.
You’ll go into government with
him.
Paddy, you were going so well
with him. Paddy, repeating yourself is not going to impress
the audience. You can say this over and over again. I
don’t think Steven Joyce will be standing up after the
election night 2017 or whenever they fly the flag. There’s
a huge change going on in this country. Let me tell you
there’s going to be a huge protest outside an Indian
MP’s Mount Roskill place this morning, today, on this
issue because now you’ve got students in their hundreds.
That is wrong.
On those students, then,
Winston Peters, where there will be the protest day, should
they get the chance at amnesty, a second chance, a chance to
stay in this country if it hasn’t been their fault, if
it’s been the corrupt agent in India? Should those
students—?
Of course they should.
Of course they should. Of course they should. We’ve said
that, unlike Mr Joyce’s claim, he says they signed the
application, therefore they are fully responsible. Look, the
applications were prepared fraudulently by agents. They were
offered jobs in New Zealand, 20 hours a week, fraudulently
by agents. Everywhere you see fraud, even in terms of export
education in New Zealand. Those students who are innocent
should be allowed to stay because we have to rescue this
country’s reputation of dealing with people, regardless of
where they come from, fairly. It’s about equality and what
a decent society would do. But I’d go after those agents.
I’d been going after them years ago, as we have argued in
Parliament for a long, long time.
Okay,
another development on the immigration front that we saw
this week was the start of an Indian party, the People’s
Party. What are your thoughts on that? What does that show
us about New Zealand, in your view, that we now have an
immigrant party, an immigrant-orientated
party?
Well, when you see things,
don’t just believe what you see. The person that was the
spokesperson and the temporary leader for that party just at
a recent raffle for fundraising for the National Party
offered $20,000 in a bid for the Prime Minister to have
breakfast at his place. He got beaten by a bid of $27,000.
This is a National Party front. I’m sure you guys in the
media with the presence of mind of politics, with all your
experience have picked this up, because I
have.
Well, what use is it as a National Party
front? It’s a political party. What use is it as a
National Party front?
Because it
splits other parties’ votes, and you’ll see it
potentially—
No—
But
probably out of them right now. But going for Mount Roskill,
there were people saying yesterday that’s what they would
do. They won’t be after— I’ve just told you what
I’ve just told you.
So it’s a way of
keeping Labour out of Mount Roskill, this People’s Party,
a National Party front that’s a way
of—?
Precisely. That’s why
they’re based on race, been here for five minutes, demand
to have a political party of their own. Which New Zealander
would go to any country in Europe or Asia and demand to have
their own political party?
They’re New
Zealand—
We’re not getting
respect here.
They’re New Zealand citizens,
and they’ve been here for years, and this is a democracy,
Winston Peters.
I know it’s a
democracy. I know it’s a
democracy.
They’re just setting up a
political party – there’s nothing wrong with it. It’s
all within the rules.
No, no,
they’re setting up a movement based on race, and my party
is utterly opposed to it. We have all sorts of people in our
party — Chinese, Indian, all sorts of
people.
It’s not based on race; it’s based
on immigration. Okay, so on
immigration—
No, no, it’s
not—
…we’ll move on to
that.
No, Paddy, who do you think—?
Hang on. Who do you think my informant is on this Indian
party? They’re Indians in New Zealand First. We know what
we’re doing. Some of you guys may not.
Okay,
moving on to immigration more broadly now. If you are in
this kingmaker position after the election, will
you—?
Oh, Paddy, you’re back on
the kingmaker.
Well, no, it’s actually back
on—
We’re going to turn your
polls—
It’s actually back on how you would
act in government on a major policy issue, so just hear me
out. Will you—?
No, Paddy. No,
Paddy. I’m not going to be prescripted by the media in the
next 12 months. Let me tell you this – you’ve got the
parties of the right; you’ve got a whole lot of cling-ons;
you’ve got a whole lot of parties on the left clinging on
to each other as well. My party sails
alone—
Yes, as I said earlier, save the
speech—
And that’s what the next
battle’s going to be about.
I’m trying to
ask you a question about immigration, not listen to your
speech for tomorrow’s conference a day early. Now, will
you—?
Well, you should do, Paddy,
because you’d be very helpful to the people of New Zealand
if you did.
Will you demand that immigration
is seriously cut back or dropped as a condition of you going
with any government, be it led by Labour or led by
National?
I can’t believe I’m on
a programme where an experienced, serious, respectable
journalist like you asks me a question like that. You know
what our policy is. It is to cut to the bone to people we
need, not who need us.
And then that’d
be—?
Get that very clearly out to
the New Zealand people. We’re not compromising on that or
for sales of our assets to offshore interests or massive
offshore money buying up this country’s future, no.
We’ve got a line in the sand as clear as daylight, and
you’ve got a chance in the next election to sign up on the
right side of this country’s future.
All
right, thank you very much, Winston. We’re out of
time.
Thank you.
Thank
you so
much.
Cheers.