The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews Gerry Brownlee
On The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews Gerry
Brownlee
Youtube clips from the show
are available here.
Headlines:
Acting
Civil Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee says it will take 18
months for a text message alert system for tsunami warnings
to be put in place. He says he’s told Civil Defence
that’s not good
enough.
Brownlee
says he’ll look into why a new system called Tsunado is on
shelf, despite having $500,000 taxpayer money spent on
it.
Brownlee
says it is definitely a problem that local boards took so
long to put out tsunami warnings and that has to be sorted
out.
How
big a problem is it that Geonet isn’t staffed 24 hours a
day?
Well, it didn’t stop
everyone knowing there had been an earthquake, did
it?
Yeah, but we might have just been lucky. I
mean, that’s—
No, no,
Paddy, with all due respect, the felt effect of this was
enormous. People knew what had happened, and within a very
short time, GeoNet was able to pick up – as they were
alerted the same way as everybody else – on the size of
it. They had to revise that later, as it was not a
20-second, 30-second earthquake. It was one and a half
minutes, so it got elevated up. The reality is we all felt
what happened and know the effects of what’s
happened.
Yeah, but as Minister of Civil
Defence, or Acting Minister of Civil Defence, is it really
good enough to not have the earthquake monitoring system not
staged 24 hours a day because there isn’t enough funding?
I mean—
Well, hang on a
minute. The sensors are operating 24/7. The international
connections are operating 24/7. And this is—you need to
get someone from GNS to fully explain how it all works, but
a lot of them—
With respect, they have
explained how it works, and they said they don’t have
someone in there 24 hours a
day.
Yeah, I’m just
trying to tell you—
They don’t have enough
money.
I’m just trying to
tell you that whether or not there is a person there 24/7,
the monitoring takes place 24/7 as part of a big wide
network.
Okay, well, we can go
around—
We can
spend—
We can go around and around in
circles here.
We are going
around in circles.
The question is will the
Government step up and fund it so we’ve got someone in
there 24 hours a day or
not?
Well, I’ve just
explained to you what the situation is, how GNS works and
how GeoNet is owned and operated, and of course, we’ll
want to have a talk about what we do in the
future.
And how quickly will that happen?
Because we’re talking here a 95% chance of another
earthquake in the next 30 days. That’s what we’re
working with – the nature of
it.
Paddy, it would not a
matter who is there monitoring. They cannot stop that
happening. That is a mathematical calculation of
probability, not fact that it will happen, and if you look
at the decay curve, each day that goes by, the probability
changes. But let me very clear – whether or not there is
someone sitting at a desk for 24 hours waiting to see if
anything happens won’t stop it happening if it’s going
to at all.
Okay, well, let’s move on and
look at the tsunami alert system, then, because that’s
another part of this Civil Defence reaction that is simply
not working – taking an hour the other night to get an
alert out about the tsunami. Is that good enough,
Minister?
Oh, look, I think
there’ll be a number of reasons why that took so long, but
in general, I’d have to say that we do want to have a good
look at how that alerting system works, but please remember
that the first indications were that the epicentre of this
was inland, and it was. What they didn’t know at that
early stage was that it had created, effectively, a fault
that ran about 150 kilometres north-east into the sea, and
at that point, a tsunami became a
possibility.
Yes, and at that point, when it
became a possibility, it still took hours after that for the
information to be disseminated to the 16 local
boards.
No, it was just
under an hour, and when it gets to those local areas, they
make the decision about how they put those alerts
out.
Yes, and some of those local boards, as
you know, took hours to get it out to the
public.
That’s right, and
that’s a problem, and that’s what we’ve got to sort
out. There’s no question about that, and I’m not going
to argue with you on this one, Paddy.
And how
quickly will you sort it is the
question.
Well, at the
moment, we’re dealing with some pretty big issues about
access into some parts of New Zealand that are isolated,
some questions about how quickly they can be reconnected,
and of course, the wider economic effects on not only those
areas, those families and individuals, but on the wider
country as well. But in the big mix of everything we do,
that is something that we’re definitely going to be
looking at.
But is it urgent? Can you reassure
the public? They’re scared, Gerry Brownlee. Can you
reassure them that you will do something urgently about the
tsunami alert?
I think
every local authority around the country will be looking to
improve that as we speak. They will have done that over the
last couple of days, and I now that the Civil Defence bunker
in Wellington is concerned about the response that came from
that. So yes, there will be something immediate. But let me
be very clear about this—
Minister, sorry to
interrupt, because this is all coming back to one thing,
isn’t it? We got lucky. You got lucky. Civil Defence got
lucky. We got lucky the other night. If it had been a high
tide; if it had been bigger; if it had been in a different
place – we weren’t ready,
Minister.
Well, I dispute
the last part. The first part, I think any time that you can
experience an event of this size and have the—so few
people, two people losing their lives only – and it’s
still too many – then you might say that you got lucky.
I’m not sure that those people would call themselves
lucky.
No, but do you agree that New Zealand
and the
Government—
Paddy,
you’re doing most of the talking. I don’t know why I’m
here. No, I don’t, because in reality, we’re a country
that lives with its risk. We all know that, and I’ve got
to make this point – the biggest warning you ever get for
a tsunami possibility is the earthquake itself. Now, it
would be good if the—and it will be improved in the future
so that the particular tsunami risk, which can’t be known
immediately, will be much sharper in getting alerts out to
people. We’re actually—Can I tell you this
too—
This is a really important
place—
Let me tell you
this much—
This is a really important place
to pick up on that, because there has
been—
No, I want to tell
you something else.
No, but there has
been—
Look, you’re
fixated on this, and I do want to tell you
this.
Yes?
The
first thing is for some time now, we’ve been looking at a
national alerting system for these types of events, and the
request for proposal to the telcos, who have to be involved
in this, is in the stage of being prepared. It’s very
close to going out.
This is a—Just for the
viewer, this is a text-message alert system, isn’t
it?
That’s right, and
there is a contingency inside the Budget to pay for that,
and we would hope to get that up and running as soon as
possible. It is not something that is going to happen
overnight.
Okay, so how long is ‘as soon as
possible’? Will we have a text-message alert system when?
Months? Years? When?
Well,
the timeline I was given yesterday I have concluded is not
acceptable. I’ve asked them to relook at
that.
Okay, so what was the timeline
yesterday, Minister? What was the timeline
yesterday?
Well, let
me—Can I just explain what goes in behind it, Paddy?
Because there’s a certain amount of, obviously—a
considerable amount of software that’s got to get put in
place as well as various other electronic protocols that
I’m not fully over. But I was told that it could take up
to 18 months, and I think that’s a little too
long.
Right, so 18 months before we get this
text-message alert system in this country when we’ve got a
95% warning of another earthquake in the next
month?
I tell you what,
Paddy. I think you and the rest of your front-line people
that I’ve heard making all sorts of pronouncements over
the last couple of days should get together in a room and
tell us how you do it quicker, because you all seem to know
a lot more than the rest of us.
No, we’re
speaking on behalf of Kiwis, Minister, who are scared and
worried—
And those Kiwis
expect us to do it properly. They expect us to do it
properly. I’ve been in a country very recently where
they’ve got a warning system, and I witnessed people who
were told that there was a major weather event coming that
would be problematic simply go about their daily lives as if
nothing had happened. So we do have to have a clear
understanding of what we’re being warned about and know
the triggers that will put that warning out in the first
place. And let’s have a public acceptance that if they get
that warning, there is what you do. It is not a
straightforward thing.
Well, let’s look at
warning systems, then, because there’s one, Tsunado, which
is an alert system placed in homes. You know about it.
$500,000 worth of taxpayer’s money has gone towards it,
and it’s sitting on the shelf in Civil Defence. Two years
ago, John Hamilton, who was the director, said it would be a
critical component, so why is that on the
shelf?
Paddy,
Patrick—
You’ve got a system on the
shelf.
Patrick, I’m the
acting minister. I haven’t been in the role very long.
I’m not aware of that, but I will look into
it.
Yeah, because why is $500,000 worth of
development of a system that was – and I’ve got the
documentation here. I’ll give it to your office if you
want – that John Hamilton
said—
That’ll be very
helpful.
It was going to be a critical
component of this. Next minister, it’s gone on the shelf,
and you’re telling us today it’s 18 months until a
decent system comes in.
No,
no, no, no, hang on a minute. You’re doing what guys like
you are very good at. You’re asking for everything to be
given to you in very short, succinct millisecond answers,
taking some of that and putting your own interpretation over
the top of it. I’ll find out. I’ll find out what
that’s all about, but I can tell you that Civil Defence
have been working on an acceptable and workable warning
system for quite some time. It may be that some of the
analysis on that particular system didn’t quite fit the
bill. I don’t know that. I’ll find out.
Transcript
provided by Able. www.able.co.nz