The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews James Gleick
On The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews James
Gleick
Patrick Gower: James Gleick,
the author of Chaos and The Information has now written Time
Travel: A History. He joins me now from New York. Now,
James, if I can begin by getting this out of the way, is
time travel real or
not?
James Gleick: Well,
yes, it’s real, but unfortunately it’s mostly real just
in our heads. I mean, I’m speaking to you from yesterday.
It’s Friday where I am. You’re my future, and I know
that’s just a trick of the clock. I mean, that’s not
time travel.
I mean, is that as good as it
gets, though? Is that as good as time travel gets — just
some international time
zones?
It’s as good as
we’re going to get in the next few minutes, let’s put it
that way. No, time travel isn’t real if you mean, ‘Can
you step into a machine the way HG Wells’ time traveller
did and throw a lever and choose a year in the past or in
the future and hurtle off and get out and meet your
descendants or meet yourself in a tricky loop?’ No, I’m
afraid that’s never going to happen.
Okay,
so no Marty McFly, no Doctor Who and no Quantum Leap is what
you’re saying here, isn’t
it?
Not if you’re going
to be completely literal about it. But still here I am in
Friday, and I have to admit, even though it’s just a
gimmick — time zones and the International Date Line and
all of that — a little part of me is tempted to ask you
what’s going to happen. Is my country at war with North
Korea? Can you tell me?
Not yet, not yet, not
yet.
Thank you.
Now, what I
wanted to pick up on from your book was the grandfather
paradox, which is what you basically use to prove that time
travel can’t happen, i.e. I could not go back in time and
kill my grandfather, because, therefore, I wouldn’t be
alive today. Is that the grandfather
paradox?
Yes, that’s the
classic paradox of time travel. And almost as soon as people
started doing time travel… The grandfather paradox goes
back to the ‘20s and ‘30s, and I think it was some kid
writing a fan letter to one of the early pulp fiction
science magazines who said, ‘Look, how do you solve this
problem?’ And now we have a million variations of the same
paradox. You know, every time travel story — at least time
travel to the past, if you can change the past — causes
some paradox like it. You have to deal with it in some way.
And so if you’re a physicist or a logician, more to the
point, you might say, ‘Well, that proves that time
travel’s impossible.’ But that hasn’t stopped
generations of filmmakers and fiction writers from creating
stories where one way or another they get around the
paradox.
Yeah, but here’s why, and this is
what struck me when reading your book. Well, of course if
people eventually invent time travel, James, no one is going
to go backwards because of the grandfather paradox. Everyone
is going to use their brains and go forwards in time. So we
don’t know whether time travel is invented or not, i.e. it
could still happen,
surely.
Well, okay. A lot
of people are very hopeful, and when I tell you it’s
impossible…
Myself included. Myself
included.
Sure. And myself
too. I wouldn’t have written the book if I wasn’t kind
of a fan. And in fairness to you and to the many people who
don’t want to give up hope, I’m speaking for the science
fiction writers. It’s a weird fact that the worst sceptics
of time travel are science fiction writers who tell the
stories. And if you ask physicists, there are plenty of
physicists who will be happy to tell you, ‘Well, first of
all, we can’t rule it out. Second of all, there is a kind
of time travel that Einstein proved is possible. We know
that if you travel near the speed of light or if you travel
near a black hole in an intense gravitational field and then
you return home, you will have aged less than the people you
left behind and you could meet your grandchildren.’ So
that kind of time travel is at least physically possible.
And then we haven’t even talked about
wormholes.
We haven’t talked about
wormholes, but I wanted to ask you this. We’ll come to
those quickly, actually, after this, but first, what would
you do? Having written the book on it, if you could, would
you go backward or forward if you had the choice in
time?
You know, I ask
everybody that question myself. I started asking it, and the
answer— I won’t avoid the question. I want to go to the
future. And when I started working on the book, I assumed
that everybody wanted to go to the future, but it turns out
that’s not true. And my informal surveying of people has
led me to think that more and more of these days we’re
scared of going to the future. I mean, HG Wells, who
invented time travel, only sent his guy to the future, and
he had— there was some good news and bad news there.
Nowadays, I think we’re scared of what we’re going to
find, and we’re worried, you know… we’re worried that
we’re ruining things for our children, and maybe we
don’t want to know about it.
What you’re
saying here is that the human race is more pessimistic now
than they were when we first started thinking about time
travel.
Definitely. No
question. We first started thinking about time travel around
the end of the 19th century, and one reason people like HG
Wells were thinking about it was they were so excited about
the future, and the 19th century was coming to an end, and
there was a big round number in the calendar, and people had
electricity and electric lights and electric clocks, and
they had telegraphs sending messages at light speed around
the globe, and everybody was very excited about what the
future would hold. There was a lot of optimism and
celebrations at the turn of the century. I don’t remember
a lot of big celebrations at the turn of our century, do
you?
No, no. And we have to wrap up quickly
here, but as someone who brought the term ‘the butterfly
effect’ into mainstream use, what about wormholes, just
quickly for the viewers at home. What about a quick
layman’s definition in a few seconds of what a time travel
wormhole is?
Well, a
wormhole is a completely hypothetical speculative path
through space-time that could loop around on itself, and
it’s been used as a gimmick, as a device in some of our
favourite time travel stories. I don’t know if you saw
Interstellar a few years ago.
Yes, I
did.
But Interstellar,
yeah, the popular movie, had a wormhole in it, and as I say,
there are plenty of physicists who, if you believe in time
travel, are willing to tell you, ‘Don’t give up. It
could be possible.’
Yeah, thank you very
much, and I think the public service announcement for today
is to watch out for those time travel wormholes. Thank you
very much James Gleick, and I look forward to you coming out
to New Zealand.
Don’t
fall into one.
Yeah, and coming forward in
time when you come out here, by the
way.
Transcript provided by Able. www.able.co.nz