Green Party proposes a carrot rather than stick
Green Party proposes a carrot rather than stick approach to welfare
This is a media release made by Kay Brereton an independent beneficiary advocate.
Ms Brereton a beneficiary advocate says: “I applaud the Green Party for proposing welfare policy which appears designed to help rather than punish people who need assistance. Far too often people tell me they “just don’t like going in there” (W&I office).”
“At the moment Case managers don’t have incentives to offer people, rather they have obligations to impose, these seem to be designed to punish a person for not having a full time job.”
“People feel
threatened and vulnerable seeking help from an agency which
begins your interaction by explaining the three pages of
obligations you must obey so that your benefit is not
reduced or stopped.”
“The first thing the system
imposes when a person asks for help, is a one or two week
stand down from any assistance, and it is likely to be weeks
longer before they get any payment.”
“I support them
creating the incentive for people to move into part time
work by changing the abatement rates. At present, if you
look at it in simply financial terms it’s hardly worth
someone on a benefit taking part time work. But a change in
the abatement rates combined with a change to the bottom tax
rate, is the incentive needed and will support people into
part time and casual work.”
“As more employers are
offering part time and casual jobs this response is a needed
policy partner for the movement to a living wage for full
time employees.”
“This seems to me to be a package
which recognises the precarious labour market,and sets a
policy framework which would empower MSD to react
supportively and responsively as people fill ‘short term
market needs’, while also ensuring sufficient money for
household needs; keeping families healthy, housed and fed.
I see people at the moment quite literally starving, and
hungry people can’t work they’re not
‘productive’.”
“The benefit needs to be at a level
which will meet people’s basic needs, they will still move
into employment when the have the chance because they have
‘wants’, but people without employment must be treated
with dignity by the system, and this policy could enable
that.”