Q&A: Steven Joyce: ‘We are about three points shy"
Steven Joyce: ‘We are about three points shy of
where want to be and need to be’
Finance Minister and National’s campaign
manager, Steven Joyce, says his party wants to be three
points higher than in recent political poll results.
“I know that we’ve got lots of work to do. We’ve been quite clear all the way through we’re about three points shy of where we want to be and need to be. So we’ve got a lot of work to do over the next few weeks,” Mr Joyce told Corin Dann on TVNZ 1’s Q+A programme this morning.
A Q+A Colmar Brunton snap poll shows the Labour candidate is ahead in Ōhāriu, and based on current numbers longstanding MP and National support partner Peter Dunne would lose the seat and his place in Parliament.
In the poll, eligible voters were asked which candidate they would support. Forty eight percent picked Labour candidate Greg O’Connor, while 34 percent chose Mr Dunne.
Mr Joyce said National would
continue to ask supporters to vote for Mr Dunne even though
the party is standing its own candidate, Brett Hudson, in
the electorate. Mr Hudson scored 14 percent in the
poll.
“We’ve got a job to do to encourage people to
support Peter, primarily because he helps bring strong
stability to the government,” he said.
Colmar Brunton began polling last Saturday, finishing up on Wednesday. Five hundred and one eligible voters were polled, with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percent.
Former National Party President Michelle Boag told Jack Tame on the Q+A panel that the poll spelled trouble for the party.
“If the National Party doesn’t have Peter Dunne, they really really need ACT,” Ms Boag said.
Mr Joyce also criticised Labour’s plan to introduce royalties on commercial water.
“Labour is saying they’ll do a regional fuel tax in Auckland and possibly elsewhere. They’re doing this water tax which they won’t tell anybody what the amount is going to be. So they’re looking very shifty on that,” Mr Joyce said.
“If you want these people (farmers) to have the ability to change their farm systems, to invest in fencing off the waterways and all these things, then don’t try and tax them into oblivion.”
Q +
A
Episode
23
STEVEN
JOYCE
Interviewed by CORIN
DANN
CORIN Minister, let’s
start with your campaign hat on
first.
STEVEN Sure.
CORIN Ohariu,
big trouble there for Peter Dunne and your support
partner.
STEVEN I
think Peter certainly has it all ahead of him, but there’s
also quite a lot of National Party voters who are still
saying they are going to support Brett at this point.
Obviously all the Greens have gone over to Greg, by the
looks of it. Also a bit unsure what the ‘don’t knows’
in there. We’ve been doing our own numbers there and
they’re a bit closer and there were more ‘don’t
knows’. So we’ve got a job to do to encourage people to
support Peter, primarily because he helps bring strong
stability to the government. And as we’ve seen, in New
Zealand we’ve had good, stable government over the last
few years as against some other countries, and Peter’s
contributed to
that.
CORIN Let’s
break that down. Even if you got all 14% of Brett Hudson’s
vote that he’s getting at the moment over, probably still
wouldn’t be enough, would
it?
STEVEN As I
say, it all depends on a number of things – whether
anybody shifts. This particular poll was done after the last
couple of weeks, and there was obviously quite a shift
there. I think when people focus on the issues around the
country, as we’re starting to see when we start talking
about who’s going to put on what taxes, it’s going to
become more interesting now over the next six weeks.
Presumably, the left have sorted out their seats at the
moment – who’s going to be the leaders and the deputy
leaders in all the parties – and then we’ll get to talk
about the
issues.
CORIN You
think things will settle
down?
STEVEN I
don’t know that. Maybe Winston Peters want to kick Ron
Mark just to get a bit of attention. But I suspect we’ve
done with leadership changes, unless we start to do another
round.
CORIN I
wonder, then, if you need to hone people’s thinking a
little bit in Ohariu and send the Prime Minister there for a
cup of
tea.
STEVEN I
don’t know about that, but certainly we are being very
clear in that is we are very keen for Ohariu voters to
support Peter, because he’s helped bring the sort of
stability that’s seen New Zealand really as the envy of
the Western world compared to, say, Australia or the US or
the UK, and he’s been very helpful in that regard, and for
a new government to be able to achieve that same level of
political stability and the economic progress that we’re
achieving, Peter’s an important part of
that.
CORIN Sure.
Just quickly, though, will you rule out a staged event, some
sort of campaign even in Ohariu that will hone the minds of
those National voters – that 14% who are still backing
Brett
Hudson?
STEVEN I’m
not ruling anything out, but I haven’t got anything
planned, let’s put it that way. But in terms of that,
we’ve found in the past, I think if you took a poll in
Epsom, you may well find David Seymour behind in Epsom as
well. I haven’t done one recently. But what we do know is
it tends to happen quite late, whether it be Ohariu or Epsom
or anywhere else where these sorts of electorate contests
are underway. The moves tend to happen quite late, so I
would give it a bit of time. I’m not too
worried.
CORIN But
this is a big problem for you, isn’t it? Is this a
realisation now with Peter Dunne in trouble, Maori Party not
doing as well as it might like either, that you are going to
have to rely on Winston Peters, aren’t
you?
STEVEN Well,
I’m not sure about
that.
CORIN So you
still think you can make it without Winston
Peters?
STEVEN We’ve
said all the way through we’ve got a lot of work to do,
but the best thing we can get, and what we’ve proven in
the last three elections, if people want to see us elected,
then the best and most stable government you can get is
where you have options in terms of how you form that
government. If you only have one option, it doesn’t really
matter if it’s Winston Peters or the Maori Party or
whoever, it will be driven by those
options.
CORIN He’s
the last cab on your rank, right? And he’s now moving up
to the top, isn’t he, because the other guys are falling
away?
STEVEN No,
that’s not correct. And I think it’s a bit tough to say
the Maori Party’s falling away. I mean, they’re just
another partner, potential partner. But to be fair,
there’s been lots of talk on the left that somehow Te
Ururoa Flavell is vulnerable in Waiariki, but I haven’t
seen a single poll that suggests
that.
CORIN There
was a poll. There was the Labour internal poll suggesting he
was in trouble.
STEVEN I think we
should be careful with Labour internal polls. It’s a bit
like me saying to you, ‘Look, I think—‘
CORIN It’s a
scientific
poll.
STEVEN Well,
the UMR ones are scientific, but they do tend to be a little
bit biased towards the
left.
CORIN So
presumably your polls are a little bit biased then as well,
are
they?
STEVEN We’ll
just have to wait and see. I know that we’ve got lots of
work to do. We’ve been quite clear all the way through
we’re about three points shy of where we want to be and
need to be. So we’ve got a lot of work to do over the next
few weeks – effectively four weeks until the polls open,
and that’s going to sharpen everybody’s mind – to show
the sort of government you can expect under a National-led
government versus the alternative under
Labour.
CORIN TOP
– would you throw an olive branch out to TOP if they were
getting to
4%.
STEVEN Highly
unlikely. Very left wing, Gareth Morgan. His policies are
largely interchangeable with the left. But I just say,
‘Let’s see how things go.’ But, no, I wouldn’t have
thought
so.
CORIN All
right.
STEVEN And
to be fair, that’s one for the leader, not for the
campaign chair.
CORIN All right.
We’ll take that as a not completely ruled out,
then.
STEVEN No,
it’s not—No, no,
no.
CORIN Things
change in campaigns – last week. Who
knows?
STEVEN Well,
yes, but I think you’ll see most of the instability
appears to be on the left at this point. Not that I’m
pointing any fingers, but I think we’d be struggling to
outdo the
Greens.
CORIN How
worried are you about the Jacinda effect? Because it does
seem to be having an impact. Despite what Peter Dunne said
there. I think it’s pretty clear it’s having an impact
in Ohariu.
STEVEN No more
worried than I am at this stage of any election campaign.
Frankly, they’re all close. It’s MMP, you don’t get.
Nobody wins by a big margin. And people seem to think that
we’ve won by big margins, but actually we haven’t. Each
time we’ve had an election, we’ve only got there by a
seat or two, because it’s MMP and everybody can stack the
Cuisenaires, just like you’re trying to do that at the
moment but so I think it’s slightly different. It was
looking a bit like a 2002 campaign there, with everybody’s
votes going all over the shop, and now it’s looking a bit
more like 2005, where National voters and probably Labour
voters are a bit more focused on
their—
CORIN I
tell you what’s a bit like previous campaigns is I see
you’ve been attacking the Labour Party, suggesting
they’re a tax-and-spend party.
STEVEN Well,
they’ve been helping
us.
CORIN I’ve
seen some social media adverts out there. Do you see this
as—You’re presenting this as a party— one that’s
going to tax, and you’re going to, what, offer up some tax
cuts, are
you?
STEVEN We have
a strong economic performance, and there’s a number of
things that have contributed to that economic performance,
and adding taxes on the productive economy all over the shop
is not one of them. And I think that’s part of the
differentiation. Labour is saying they’ll do a regional
fuel tax in Auckland and possibly elsewhere. They’re doing
this water tax which they won’t tell anybody what the
amount is going to be. So they’re looking very shifty on
that. And then yesterday Grant Robertson is out saying,
‘Oh yeah, we might do a capital gains tax.’ Then
there’s the matter of the top income tax. All those
things.
CORIN No,
he said he’ll have a tax working
group.
STEVEN Hang
on, but that’s a
cute—
CORIN Yeah,
but that’s three years down the
track.
STEVEN No,
no, no, no. He saying they’ll form a tax working group to
tell them what policy
they—
CORIN Yeah,
it doesn’t mean they will follow through on a capital
gains tax. It’s an argument for another
election.
STEVEN No,
it isn’t. No, it’s another way of
saying, not an argument for another election. It’s a very
important argument at this election. You either go in with
your tax policy clear or you don’t.
CORIN They have
been clear in that they have got a water tax and they have
got a petrol
tax.
STEVEN They
don’t know what the water tax is, and they’re they would
like to do a capital gains tax, but actually they can’t
bring themselves to say that, so what they’re going to do
is hand it to a working group and then when the working
group comes out and says ‘capital gains tax’, they’ll
say, ‘There. We told you we’d come up with one.’
CORIN But working
groups in the past have come out and said those things and
governments have ignored them. We know
that.
STEVEN Right.
And if you trust Grant Robertson on tax, you can ignore
it.
CORIN I want
to come back to
water.
STEVEN Yep.
Sure.
CORIN So you
are saying you would okay with a royalty on bottled water,
but the farming sector is off limits. You would not impose
any sort of pollution tax, whatever you want to call it, on
them for water
use.
STEVEN Our
food producers are some of the most efficient in the world,
but they are in a very competitive situation. So whether
it’s in Marlborough or in Hawke’s Bay or in the Bay of
Plenty or in Canterbury or Otago and so on around the
country, they need to be competitive. Putting more taxes on
them will reduce their employment and also challenge the
viability of regional New
Zealand.
CORIN I
don’t want to denigrate farmers here, because I know a lot
of them are doing a great job here, but have you put that
focus on that agricultural sector at the expense of the
environment and of water quality? Your
government.
STEVEN Absolutely
not. Just nobody can argue that. Because we are putting in
this National Policy Statement. We’re requiring people to
measure their water use and control their water use. And
we’ve also got the farmers fencing off all the waterways.
There is absolutely no
way.
CORIN I’ll
argue it, because your Chief Science Advisor to the
government has argued there’s a clear link between
intensifying of dairying and water quality. The
Parliamentary Commissioner has consistently warned that
intensifying dairy farming is hurting water. The Canterbury
Medical Officer of Health this week said that midwives have
become the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff because
they’re worried about pregnant women drinking water from
polluted nitrates in private
bores.
STEVEN Can
we start for a second on the whole issue of how a region
actually affords cleaning up their waterways, which is
what’s going on right now? They’re getting cleaned up
now.
CORIN I want
to give you that. Yep, you’re doing a lot of stuff to
clean it up, but the point I’m making is you took your eye
off the ball for the last nine
years.
STEVEN Oh,
no, I’m sorry the eye has been taken off the ball for the
20 or 30 years before
that.
CORIN So that
makes it all right for the last nine
years?
STEVEN No,
because actually these are the things we’ve done over the
last nine years. There is no way that people can be critical
of the progress this government has made compared to all
previous
governments.
CORIN You’ve
also added a million cows and you’ve also put up $400
million for irrigation – millions on irrigation. You’ve
encouraged more dairy
farming.
STEVEN Hang
on a second. Let’s talk about that. Because the irrigation
projects were required to get through the RMA, which has
stringent requirements around the environment and in most
cases improve water quality, in fact, probably all
cases.
CORIN And
you think that’s worked well in
Canterbury?
STEVEN Well,
I think they are working
well.
CORIN You had
to put commissioners in
there.
STEVEN Excuse
me for a second. The commissioners had to come in because of
the inactivity over the
previous—
CORIN Because
the system wasn’t
working.
STEVEN Give
me a moment. The inactivity over the previous couple of
decades, that’s why the commissioners went in. And
actually most people would recognise that Canterbury now has
an operative water plan for the first time ever and it was
this government that actually forced them to achieve it.
It’s this government that’s given them the National
Policy Statement. It’s this government that’s making all
the progress. Now, what we don’t want to do is actually
tax these regions to effectively to make them poorer,
because there is no part of the world where there is a poor
country that does a good job with its environment so you
have to balance it. You have to both improve the
environmental outcomes
and—
CORIN You’re
putting lots of work in. Great. But can you give me an
answer – have we reached peak cow? Will you continue to
increase the herd? Because it seems to me the argument from
these guys is that unless you reduce the amount of dairying
or at least slow it down, you’re never going to get water
quality back to good
standards.
STEVEN I’m
sorry. It’s unfair to pick on the dairy industry on its
own, because actually this is also a very big problem in
urban waterways. And notably most of these people are very
quiet about the quality of urban water, because they don’t
want to upset consumers. So this a bit of a left-right
battle in many ways – not in all ways, but in many ways
– because the left are keeping very quiet on some of the
quality of water in our municipal
waterways.
CORIN I’ll
have David Parker on about that in a few
moments.
STEVEN And
that’s really important, because he’s proposing, for
example, to charge the farmers, the horticulturalists and
the winemakers and leave the industrial users in the cities
completely off
scott-free.
CORIN I
will pick him up on that. But I want an answer, because this
is crucial for the economic direction – as Finance
Minister, are you going to allow the cow numbers to
increase? Are you going to keep the focus on dairy? Because
Prime Minister John Key was quite comfortable with getting
more out of the dairying sector, but do you see there
actually being a limit having been
reached?
STEVEN Well
firstly, most of the growth we’re getting in the dairy
sector is in productivity, based around, for example, the
mozzarella cheeses, the higher value usages of existing
dairy, which is fantastic. In terms of whether there can be
more cows in any one area, that’s controlled under the RMA
and it’s controlled by the local governments in those
areas. And that’s the right place for it to be done,
because they’re able to make that assessment. You don’t
want central government politicians like me running around
saying, ‘Well look, you have the exact right number of
cows in Taranaki is X,’ because it just doesn’t make any
sense. You’ve got to measure them against the
environmental outcomes. But I firmly believe that we can
achieve improved environmental outcomes and also increase
the economic performance of our regions. And in fact, if we
don’t, then we’ll end up with poorer regions and very
rubbishy waterways, because you can’t do these things
unless you have the money to do them. And that’s what our
farmers are doing. They’re profitable. They’re fencing
off waterways. They are taking the steps that’s
required.
CORIN They’re
not paying for their fair share of the
pollution.
STEVEN Well
no. I know that’s Mr Parker’s argument. But actually
they are paying, because these guys are doing
all—
CORIN What
are they paying in terms of the pollution they caused in
waterways?
STEVEN You
go and have a chat to them. Most of them are doing things
like big stands to put their stock on in winter. All these
things that are being required to be done be the regional
council.
CORIN That’s
mitigation.
STEVEN But that’s actually
the true outcome. If you just tax them, all you do is take
their income off them and give them less ability to
respond.
CORIN No,
don’t you incentivise them to perhaps look at other
farming? You could argue you’re giving them a subsidy at
the moment by not making them pay for
that.
STEVEN I know
there are those that argue that. I disagree entirely. But
let’s go there. Let’s just say what we should do is tax
these people, so their incomes drop, so they can’t afford
to change the way that they farm. This is a good
idea?
CORIN They’re
either competitive on their own or
not.
STEVEN No, no,
no. But if you, say, for example, take out $50,000 or
$100,000 out of a farmer’s income, then that’s money
they don’t have to spend
on—
CORIN You’re
a free-market economist. You like businesses to be able to
stand on their own. You don’t want to be propping them up,
do you?
STEVEN I
just don’t want to hit them with a 50K or 100K tax just
because David Parker and the Labour Party think so. And
that’s a crazy thing. If you want these people to have the
ability to change their farm systems, to invest in fencing
off the waterways and all these things, then don’t try and
tax them into oblivion. It’s crazy. It’s the left.
It’s the left’s approach – if it moves, tax it. But as
I say, the New Zealand economy is performing well. We’ve
got many steps in place to improve our environment. And the
way we afford those things – for example, electric
vehicles, announced just yesterday – is to be wealthy
enough to make those
changes.
CORIN Steven
Joyce, thank you very much for your
time.
Please find attached the full
transcript and here’s the link to our interview and our panel discussion.
Q+A, 9-10am
Sundays on TVNZ 1 and one hour later on TVNZ 1 +
1.
Repeated Sunday evening at around 11:35pm. Streamed
live at www.tvnz.co.nz
Thanks to the
support from NZ On Air.
Q+A is also on Facebook: here and on Twitter