The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews Martin O'Malley
On The Nation: Patrick Gower interviews Martin O'Malley
Patrick Gower: OK,
welcome back. Well, racism is well and truly back on the
political agenda in the United States of America, with
President Donald Trump roundly criticised this week for his
lack of reaction to that attack at a white nationalist rally
in Charlottesville,
Virginia.
Now,
our next guest came third in the race to be the Democratic
presidential candidate last year. Earlier this year, he was
criticised for some comments that ended up looking like they
linked Trump to the Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan. Martin
O'Malley joins me
now.
Governor,
you were criticised earlier this year for these comments
that ended up comparing Donald Trump in some senses to the
Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan. What do you make of that
criticism now?
Martin
O’Malley: Yeah, I believe it was— I forget the great
statesman; maybe it was Edmund Burke who said, 'It's enough
for the success of evil that good people fail to speak up
and say anything.' So we must call it out for what it is. I
think, in the hindsight of history, people realise that the
vision that they saw — the reality that they saw on their
television set — of people marching in torchlight parades
in Charlottesville, Virginia, in the United States of
America, was a scene that was more reminiscent of
Kristallnacht than it is of Thomas Jefferson's Virginia. So,
that didn't happen overnight. There was a drumbeat that many
people ignored. It was an appeal to division and fear. And
it met, in many cases, all of the markers of what fascism is
— an appeal to a militant white nationalism, a celebration
of an aggressive masculinity, a vilification of the Other,
be they immigrants or people of colour or what have you. And
we need to recover the true spirit of our nation and the
goodness within; and I believe we will. But this is an
extremely painful period for all of us in the United
States.
And do you feel that President Trump
has built that — to use your words — that drumbeat? Do
you think he allowed that to happen, in terms of his actions
and attitude going right back to the last
president?
Oh, Paddy, he
absolutely has. I mean, just in the recent hours he fired
— finally, under pressure — a man named Stephen Bannon,
who will likely go back to his great publication online,
Breitbart, which respectable journalism all over the planet
refers to as a platform for neo-Nazis, for anti-Semites and
white supremacists. That was the first time, and probably
the last time, we'll ever see a president of the United
States appoint someone with that reputation and that
ideological and racist belief system to be a chief adviser
in our White House. So he's absolutely perpetuated this
drumbeat. What many people saw as 'Make America great again'
many others heard as 'Make America white again'. What some
saw as hateful speech from Donald Trump, others heard as
permission to act in violent ways. And we even saw him, in
some of his rallies, the thinly veiled appeal to Second
Amendment gun supporters to 'take care of Hillary Clinton',
the encouragement of people at his rallies to rough up
protesters. These are all the hallmarks of a sort of base
and fascist politics that has no place in the prouder
traditions of the United States of
America.
So, you're saying what we saw in
Charlottesville, which actually led to the death of an
American, you're saying that was almost directly caused in
some ways by this environment that President Trump has
created — that he effectively incited
this?
Yes, I sure am. And I
think that most reasonable people would look at the events
and see that this was the logical conclusion of giving cover
and encouragement to people with that sort of hateful belief
system.
Yeah. I mean, as you said earlier, you
essentially compared him to Nazis, to the Ku Klux Klan
themselves.
Well, in
fairness—
Those are strong
words.
Well, they are. And
look at his failure to repudiate the violence of the Klan
and neo-Nazis. You know, some of my friends— I mean, the
actual quote was, I said that this was not a time to
reconcile with people who spew hate. We should take as our
inspiration Bonhoeffer, who never negotiated or looked for
compromise or reconciliation with the Nazis; Bishop Romero,
who never looked for reconciliation with the oligarchs of El
Salvador; and we should look to Dr King, who never looked
for reconciliation with the KKK. However, Dr King also said
we just have to 'love the hell out of them' — people whose
opinions you can't change. And I do believe that peaceful
action, and I do believe that our institutions of law,
including the Mueller investigation of Donald Trump and his
campaign for colluding with the Russians illegally and in
violation of American criminal statutes, will eventually
allow us to return to the more moderate and forward-looking
America that the rest of the world has come to appreciate
and depend upon.
Yeah, I want to pick up on
that. Because, you know, out here, we look at what the
United States calls its 'checks and balances'. Now, are
there going to be, or are there the checks and balances in
the American system to stop Donald Trump if it's needed to
stop his presidency? Because remember, we're not even one
year into it yet.
Well,
that remains to be seen. None of us has a crystal ball. Very
few of us would predict what we've done to ourselves as a
nation, with his election. But I do believe the special
prosecutor, the two grand juries empanelled in Northern
Virginia and also in Washington, DC, and the team that
former FBI director Mueller now heads as special counsel
will have a... they have an opportunity-rich environment,
shall we say, to trace undisclosed sources of cash and
collusion and other things. And I think that ultimately our
public institutions will prove strong. I mean, I guess,
looking at the glass half full or half empty, we've been in
existence for 250 years and this is the first time we've
elected a man like this. So great people aren't great
because they're imperfect — sometimes they make mistakes.
But great republics correct those mistakes. And the other
bulwark, really, is, if you look at cities all across the
United States, there are actually really positive and good
things happening. Public trust is actually increasing,
quality of life. This whole new way of governing that I came
here to New Zealand to talk about, thanks to Eagle
Technologies and a user conference. The way you all
recovered in Wellington and in other places after earthquake
tremors — it's the ability to take technology, as a
democracy, and actually deliver better results. I mean,
ultimately the sort of appeal that someone like Donald Trump
has, it's only because people give up and throw in the towel
on their own democracy.
Yeah, so, in terms of
that, if there are these good things happening, how do you
stop what is essentially a block to it, which is the
President of the United States? Can you see a scenario where
Donald Trump doesn't make the full term? Is that realistic
to you?
Sure, I think it's
very realistic. I mean, just watching it lately, the whole
thing has kind of turned to custard, hasn't it? I mean, the
number of people that have resigned at top positions, and
the business community and business leaders who withdrew
from business advisory groups because of how ashamed they
were—
And the number of Republicans that
we've seen — Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz — the level of
opposition from the Republicans is higher than ever before.
But what is the realistic way, in your view, to get Donald
Trump out of there before that full term is
served?
Well, I think these
various criminal investigations will move, and are moving
probably very fast. And probably faster than most of us have
seen, given our grand jury process and those proceedings
being secret. In fact, those grand juries had been
empanelled for several weeks before news leaked out that
they were even empanelled.
So you think we
could see an
impeachment?
Oh, I think
you'll... Before you seen an impeachment, I think you'll see
criminal indictments. And... You know, I think there's a lot
of Republicans of good will in the Republican Party who
would much rather head into the midterms with a President
Pence at the top of their ticket than Donald
Trump.
Well, then, how ready — you're a
Democrat — how ready do the Democrats need to be to mount
some sort of challenge, mount another presidential
campaign?
Yeah, this is the
great challenge, isn't it? As a party, we have to do a much
better job of bringing every question back to the economy
hope and the economic anxieties that so many Americans who
voted for Donald Trump — and others — experience every
day. As a nation, we used to make sure that when you worked
harder, you earned more, that wages went up, that we could,
in every generation, give our kids opportunities for fuller
lives with more security, more well-being. And in a lot of
places, and around a lot of homes in
America—
Are the Democrats ready to get that
message out if you need to — if there's a challenge before
2020?
I think we're going
to have a very robust and contested primary; there will
probably be 20 people running. And out of that primary, I
believe a much more crystallised and focused message on
making pay go up, wages go up, opportunity for all, is what
we need to articulate as a party. And we also need to
nominate a candidate who was the credibility to speak to
that.
And we're coming to a very sort of
personal element of that, Governor. I mean, will you be
putting your name forward to be the Democratic presidential
candidate in 2020 or
before?
Yeah, I just might.
And I haven't made that decision yet. I mean, I gave it my
very best, Paddy, tried to open a better lane for our
country. But between the relationships and the respect that
Hillary Clinton had within the party establishment, and the
very angry and long-burning flame that Bernie Sanders was
able to light, I couldn't open a better lane. But things
change, and things change quickly. And in politics, many
times it's all about timing. And I've
usually—
The time might be right for you
now.
Yeah, it's hard to
say. I think a lot of events will transpire in the course of
the next year. I certainly believe that things we stood for
— opportunity for all and the actions to make wages go up
— are still relevant today.
All right,
that's a good place to leave it. And I know you weren't
going to announce it in New
Zealand.
Hey, thanks a
lot.
Thank you so much,
Governor.
Good being with
you.
Transcript provided by Able. www.able.co.nz