Q+A: Education Minister Chris Hipkins
Q+A: Education Minister Chris Hipkins interviewed by Corin
Dann
NCEA
– ‘clearly some improvements that can be made’ -
Education Minister Chris Hipkins
The Education Minister was on TVNZ 1’s Q+A programme to discuss a potential overhaul of NCEA which goes out to public consultation today.
“The question we have now got to ask ourselves is, ‘Where is that leading?’ Because in conjunction with increasing qualification attainment, of course, we have still got an alarming number of young New Zealanders who leave school and go on to do nothing. They don’t go into any form of education, training or employment beyond school.”
The outcome of the government’s NCEA review includes potential radical changes to NCEA including more focus on numeracy and literacy and a proposal for no external exams for NCEA Level 1. It also proposes making NCEA Level 1 a 40 credit qualification.
‘Yeah, so what the advisory group have recommended is that it be cut right down to basically being a foundation-level qualification, so this is the certification of your basic skills that you will then need to go on and do Level 2 and Level 3 or whatever you do beyond school.’
When asked whether our success rate will keep climbing, the Minister said, ‘No minister of education can guarantee that. What we can guarantee, of course, is that we’re going to put as much effort as we can into getting a rigorous and robust qualification, and then we’re going to resource schools and teachers to deliver on that.’
When asked about the promise to scrap school donations, the Minister Hipkins told Corin Dann, ‘it’s a promise that we’re absolutely committed to delivering on. We haven’t been able to deliver on it in the first budget.’
On the issue of pay the Minister told Q+A’s Corin Dann, ‘there’s a bargaining round coming up. I think teachers need to have realistic expectations around that’
And when asked about the higher cost of living in Auckland and an extra bonus for teachers there, the Minister said, ‘I understand that’s likely to be something that comes up in this year’s bargaining round, so of course, we’ll consider it if that’s what’s being asked for.’
Q +
A
Episode
1811
CHRIS
HIPKINS
Interviewed by CORIN
DANN
PART
1
CORIN Chris Hipkins, great to
have you with us on Q +
A.
CHRIS Good
morning.
CORIN It
is a big job. Researching for this, there is a lot to do.
And I want to start first with NCEA. Because you have called
for a review of that, and there are some findings of that
review you have got this morning. First of all, why did you
feel the need to change the qualification for secondary
school
students?
CHRIS Well,
I think NCEA is working in terms of, you know, getting more
kids achieving qualifications, and that is a very positive
development. Over the lifespan of NCEA, we have seen
increasing qualifications, particularly amongst those who
weren’t succeeding in education previously. That is a
great thing. The question we have now got to ask ourselves
is, ‘Where is that leading?’ Because in conjunction with
increasing qualification attainment, of course, we have
still got an alarming number of young New Zealanders who
leave school and go on to do nothing. They don’t go into
any form of education, training or employment beyond
school.
CORIN So,
are you questioning the qualification itself, that it is not
credible?
CHRIS Well,
no, it is just a question of whether we have got everything
right about the NCEA. I think now that the NCEA has been in
place for a good 15-plus years, it is a good chance to look
at it and say, ‘What is working, and what can be
improved?’ Because there is clearly some improvements that
can be
made.
CORIN All
right. Let us start with this. So NCEA Level 1, which, for
people who perhaps are not familiar, it used to be School
Certificate – that is what I sat many years ago. Under the
recommendation you have released today, quite a big change
there. You would sort of descale it. It would be halved in
the number of points, from 80 to 40, and more focused on
numeracy and
literacy.
CHRIS Yeah,
so what the advisory group have recommended is that it be
cut right down to basically being a foundation-level
qualification, so this is the certification of your basic
skills that you will then need to go on and do Level 2 and
Level 3 or whatever you do beyond school. So it actually
reimagines it, not quite so much as a replacement for School
Certificate, but something quite different. And then Level 2
and Level 3 will be where you demonstrate your skills in a
particular
area.
CORIN But
there are some fishhooks, aren’t there? Because you’re
saying at NCEA Level 1, you want a stronger focus on
numeracy and literacy. So it’ll be tougher. It’ll be
higher standards. And in the report, it does say that this
would lead to more students failing in the short
term.
CHRIS What
the review panel have recommended, actually is that we
strengthen literacy and numeracy requirement’s right
through NCEA, so including through Levels 2 and 3. So rather
than the current focus, which is you get your literacy and
numeracy right at the start, and then you assume that that
carries through, they’re actually saying no, we need to
continue to demonstrate strong literacy and numeracy right
the way through the qualification. And I think that’s
actually a really useful finding, because one of the pieces
of feedback we get is that young people are leaving school
without the literacy and numeracy skills that they
need.
CORIN But
more people will fail, and, I guess, you talked about the
success of NCEA at the start, and one of the successes has
been the flexibility, the ability for people who perhaps
were in and out of school maybe or they are last, but the
system was able to be flexible; maybe they could do courses
in coffee making or whatever – keep them in school. And
then they might go on to higher education. Is there a danger
if you scale it back like this and remove some of that
flexibility that they might not be
there?
CHRIS No, I
don’t think there is. I think it raises the bar for us. It
means we’re going to have to work harder. But I don’t
think anyone wants more people achieving qualifications by
lowering the standard or lowering the bar. In fact, what we
want to be doing is looking for constant and continual
improvement so that we’re actually delivering those young
people what they should be getting out of education, which
is a pathway to something more beyond
school.
CORIN And
that’s interesting, because the Level 2 and 3, you are
saying you want that pathway through to a career actually
formalised qualification in some way so that they work with
a tertiary provider or they work with an employer. How is
that going to
work?
CHRIS Well,
that is one of the things the review panel have recommended,
that we look more at – how do we build pathways into the
qualification, because at the moment, for NCEA Levels 1, 2
and 3, you effectively accumulate a specific number of
credits. And it can be a bit of a grab-bag, and therefore,
the focus has become on how many credits am I going to get
for this particular piece of learning or for this particular
assessment, rather than what’s the overall qualification
I’m building and where is that going to lead me. So if
someone knows that they want to go into the trades, for
example, they want to be a builder, well, there are certain
maths skills that you need to do that job, but you’re not
necessarily guaranteed to get those out of your NCEA at the
moment. So the idea is that we sit down with those young
people and say, you know, ‘What’s the pathway you want
to get on, and what do you need to put in your qualification
to make sure you can actually get
there?’
CORIN Fees
would go as well, remove fees for paying to do the
qualification and get communities and parents more involved
– how would you do
that?
CHRIS Well, I
think in terms of the fees, that’s one of the panel’s
recommendations. That’s about a $12 million commitment, so
I’m not committing to doing that, but we’ve put it out
there, and let’s have a discussion about that. We know
that for some students who complete NCEA, they don’t then
get the certificate, because they’re not paying to get the
certificate and so that, you know, clearly, if they’ve
gone all the way through, they’ve got their certificate,
why would we put that financial barrier in their way? So we
can look at
that.
CORIN Can you
give an assurance that we won’t see those numbers of NCEA
results drop? Because we’ve seen fantastic results in the
last few years, particularly for Maori and Pacific students.
If these tests in Level 1 get harder, you know, you run the
risk that you’re going to see some of these kids not make
it through, and that discourages them, and then, you know,
and we’re not getting that
benefit.
CHRIS I
don’t think it is about making it harder; I think it’s
about focusing down on the core skills that we want people
to get at that foundation level, at Level 1. So they’ll
actually need to do fewer credits to get Level 1, but
they’ll be more
focused.
CORIN So
that success rate will keep
climbing?
CHRIS Well,
I can’t guarantee that. No minister of education can
guarantee that. What we can guarantee, of course, is that
we’re going to put as much effort as we can into getting a
rigorous and robust qualification, and then we’re going to
resource schools and teachers to deliver on
that.
CORIN And
employers – this is also tailored for them, because this
is giving them more of a set standard, they know what
they’re getting. Is that
right?
CHRIS Well,
what employers say is that they actually want to know a lot
more about young people when they leave school. They want to
know how well did they collaborate with other people – you
know, there’s a whole lot of those what we might call soft
skills that employers also view as incredibly important. So
one of the questions for the school system is, how can we
ensure that employers are getting the information that they
want out of the qualification
system?
CORIN All
right. If we can start moving on to some of the many other
things in education – we’ll try. Where is your
government’s focus and priority on closing the gaps, on
lifting the performance of the Maori and Pacific students
who are – unfairly or whatever – are filling those
bottom
statistics?
CHRIS Well,
the government’s objective is to make sure the education
system is delivering for everybody, whatever their
background and whatever their levels of skill or ability. So
I don’t want to see an education system where we say that
we’ll raise Maori and Pasifika educational achievement by
directing them into a narrower range of educational
opportunities. I want us to make sure that we’re putting
an emphasis on providing a broad-based education for
everybody.
CORIN You
want it to be
universal?
CHRIS Absolutely.
CORIN There’s
no closing the gaps
programme?
CHRIS Well,
no, you’re conflating two different things
there.
CORIN But
why not a dedicated, priority target programme at those
kids? You know they’re struggling. You know, where’s
your programme?
CHRIS Oh, we will
certainly have dedicated Maori and Pacific plans and
programmes in place to address, you know, underachievement
in the education system. But what I’m not going to do is
say that because someone fits a certain profile that they
should be directed into a certain course of learning. I
think, you know, all of the educational opportunities should
be available to all young
people.
CORIN Because
this week, of course, you announced the deciles, that you
will stick will the decile system, even though you
acknowledge yourself it’s got problems and one day, you
want to get rid of it. And I wonder if that’s – and this
is instead of the previous government’s policy, which was
to target the funding at individual students of
disadvantage. And it would have meant potentially another
$100 million to $175 million targeting disadvantaged
children. You’ve said in your Cabinet paper that that’s
not your priority; you’ve got other priorities. Surely,
that’s got to be the top
priority.
CHRIS That’s
not quite what I said in the Cabinet paper. What I’ve said
is that we’re not going to continue with the per-child
funding
amount.
CORIN You
say here you have your own priorities and face significant
cost pressures in important areas. ‘I do not propose that
we displace these priorities in favour of an unfunded
promise from the previous
government.’
CHRIS That’s
right. Well, you’re taking one line out of what
is quite an extensive, you know, explanation of what we’re
doing. We’re not continuing with the per-child funding
amount; we are continuing to look at how we can better use
the data to target extra support. Now, the previous
government’s whole programme was about targeting around 3%
of school funding. What we’re saying is if this data’s
given us really good insight into where disadvantage exists,
how can we actually use to better target resourcing across
the board, rather than just in that 3%?
CORIN But
the work had been done, and you could have targeted more
money at those kids, but I wonder if it’s because you’ve
invested so much in tertiary education that you don’t
really have the money to do these sorts of
things.
CHRIS No,
that’s not true. So the previous government’s commitment
was that they would introduce the new at-risk index as a
funding model, but they would do so on a basis that no
school would lose any money. So they put more money into
schools that met a certain
profile.
CORIN And what’s wrong with that?
CHRIS Well, the only way you could do that is to continue to run both systems side by side. So they’d have to keep running the decile system anyway while they introduce the at-risk funding.
CORIN But the point is, their priority was those disadvantaged kids. You’re saying quite clearly you’ve got other priorities, which is fine, but that’s a choice you’ve made, right?
CHRIS Well, no, because actually,
what I’m saying is we’ve got better insight now into
what that data tells us than they did when they started that
exercise. For example, putting a simple dollar amount per
child isn’t necessarily going to be the best way to target
disadvantage, because we know that schools with high
concentrations of students with disadvantage have more
challenges in meeting those than schools with low
concentration. So simply putting a dollar amount on the head
of each child isn’t going to help us really target where
the disadvantage
is.
CORIN Okay,
very quick question here – just a quote from a newspaper
story yesterday, Stuff media, from Nicholas Boyack, where he
quoted Ian Hastie from Avalon Intermediate. He said,
‘We’ve become a land of haves and have-nots. We are a
country with a definite two-tier education system, and that
has to stop.’ He says, ‘Children should to their local
school, face reality that New Zealand is a culturally
diverse society.’ Do you agree with that?
CHRIS Absolutely. I mean, I went to my local schools, and I certainly hope the same for my children. And I think, you know, the government’s goal here is to ensure that every school is a great school, and you should be able to send your child to your local school with confidence.
CORIN What is your policy to ensure that we don’t have – which is what he’s talking about here – white flight?
CHRIS Well, look, I think this is where the decile debate does become important, because I think parents have used decile rankings as a quality indicator, and they’re not. Actually, some of the kids in low-decile schools are making huge amounts of progress, and, you know, that’s comparable or better than they’re doing in higher-decile schools.
CORIN Chris Hipkins, stay there – we will come back.
PART
2
JACINDA
ARDERN: When those young people are at school, I
want us to do everything we can to make sure they are ready
for work. And that means doing little things like making
sure that they’ve got a driver’s licence. Under Labour,
every young person will be able to access a learner’s, a
restricted and five free lessons when they are at school –
for free. For free.
CORIN Jacinda
Ardern there on the election campaign trail. A lot of
promises, Chris Hipkins, a lot of promises. That was one –
haven’t seen that in the
budget.
CHRIS Well,
we’re still working on exactly how to implement that,
because of course, you’ve got to have the capacity to
deliver it. So it’s not a question of just shovelling
money at it. You’ve then got to be able to deliver
it.
CORIN So
you’ve got to do the work on that
one?
CHRIS We’ve
got to do the work on that one, just to make sure we’ve
got the capacity to deliver on
that.
CORIN The big
promise, I think, that you made – and teachers and schools
are disappointed about – is donations, and you’ve been
pushed on this this week. And you’ve been quoted as saying
you were getting work underway, that you were really keen to
see this happen. Why isn’t it happening? This is where
schools could effectively pay the donation for parents. That
was a big
promise.
CHRIS And
it’s a promise that we’re absolutely committed to
delivering on. We haven’t been able to deliver on it in
the first
budget.
CORIN What
happened? Did you just lose the argument round the cabinet
table?
CHRIS No,
no. Look, there are a lot of financial pressures that we had
to deal with in the first budget, including the biggest
increase in student numbers in decades. And so the result is
we had to make sure we were funding that properly; we were
putting extra teachers into schools – 1500 extra teachers
to catch up with population growth. So that was a higher
priority. But of course, it’s still a commitment that
we’ve made, and we will deliver on
it.
CORIN But most
people in education feel like they missed out across the
board. Early childhood did pretty well, but certainly,
schools feel that they didn’t do that well out of the
budget, that you haven’t actually delivered on these big
promises.
CHRIS Well,
look, every school principal who I’ve spoken to over the
last five or six years whenever I’ve visited schools –
every one, almost without fault – has said that the single
biggest issue they want the government to address is kids
with special needs, learning support difficulties. And this
year’s budget made that a priority. Now, that means that
there’s a lot of money goes into a relatively small number
of children. But unless we actually do that, we’re never
going to meet that demand from school principals – and
teachers and parents – to provide better support for the
kids who most need
it.
CORIN The other
promises were around adult education. There was getting 100%
qualified teachers at early childhood. Are you going to
follow through? Are we going to see those by the end of the
three years? Because I’m just struggling— When did it
become a ‘we deliver at some point in the three years’
as opposed to just delivering. I mean, are we going to see
them?
CHRIS Well,
we’ve got an ambitious education
plan…
CORIN Yes
or no?
CHRIS …and
we set that out over three years. And one of the things
about setting out a three-year plan is you can’t deliver
it all in year
one.
CORIN But
I don’t seem to recall in the election campaign
you saying, ‘Oh, these are things we’ll do over three
years.’ These were promises you were going to bring
in.
CHRIS Well, I
think if you look at any government’s manifestos, you’ll
find that they’re not all delivered in the first year of a
government. In fact, there are commitments the National
Party made in 2008 that, nine years on, they still hadn’t
delivered on. I can say that we’re going to do a lot
better than that and that our manifesto will be delivered
across the three
years.
CORIN So
everything that was in the speech from the throne on
education will be there in the three
years?
CHRIS Of
course. And of course, we’re a coalition government as
well, so we’ve got to recognise that other parties in
government made commitments that need to be accommodated
too.
CORIN National
had a policy of community learning, where they got schools
to help other schools. Schools that were struggling got help
from high-performing principals. Quite a lot of money there
– are you going to keep
that?
CHRIS The
Investing in Education Success programme? Yes, that will
stay in. At the moment, it’s part of the review of
Tomorrow’s Schools as to how that might be refined and
improved, but at the moment, we’re certainly
continuing.
CORIN National
standards – have you got an alternative to replace that
yet?
CHRIS Well, we
don’t need it, because we’ve got the New Zealand
curriculum. And actually, national standards weren’t
national nor standard, and they didn’t measure a child’s
progress. So we’re looking at what the tools are that
schools have to make sure that they’ve got the tools they
need.
CORIN But
that’s a problem, because – I can speak from experience
– some schools are choosing to keep it, some aren’t. So,
I mean, is it a little bit confusing for parents? They
don’t know what they’re going to
get.
CHRIS No, what
we’ve said is that schools need to report to parents in
plain language how their child is doing across all areas of
the curriculum. How schools choose to do that – there’s
a degree of flexibility there. We put a lot of trust in
schools to do that well. We’ve put some pretty rigorous
requirements around what that needs to look like, but
we’re not going to go out there with a set of supposed
standards that aren’t national, aren’t standard and
don’t measure a child’s
progress.
CORIN Let’s
come to teachers, then, because we’ve got the pay issue,
and that is obviously a big issue. But a big problem along
with the shortage seems to be workload, seems to be the
pressure, seems to be this constant assessment. You’ve
taken that away for national standards. Coming back to NCEA
– will those changes to NCEA mean that secondary school
teachers have more time, able to do proper
teaching?
CHRIS Well,
one of the things we’ve got to do as part of the NCEA
review or update, if you like, is change the culture around
NCEA. Some of those kids leaving school are getting twice as
many credits as they need to achieve the qualification as it
is now, because the culture has basically become ‘if
it’s not assessed, it doesn’t count; it doesn’t
matter’. And actually, we want to say, well, the learning
that you do at school all counts, but not all of it counts
to NCEA. So we’ve got to change the culture around that,
and as a result, I think we will significantly reduce the
teachers’ assessment-related
workloads.
CORIN The
questions in terms of viewers’ questions – we’ve had a
lot of feedback. I’ll just read some to you – and not
surprisingly, a lot on the issue of teachers’ salaries. So
you are in negotiations; I know it’s a little bit tricky.
But Murray Hodges says, ‘Remuneration is one of the main
problems for teacher shortages. Some years ago, teachers’
salaries were similar to back-bench MPs. Now the difference
is huge,’ and it certainly is, and to Murray,
unacceptable. So what is your response to that? What is the
long-term goal for teachers here? How are you going to
restore them to a position of status that they
deserve?
CHRIS Well,
look, as teachers have always said to us, it’s not just
about money, although money does matter. The average primary
teacher salary is around $73,000 a year, and it’s just
under $80,000 a year for secondary
schools.
CORIN There’s
plenty of extra
duties.
CHRIS So we
know that they’re not terrible salaries, but of course,
there’s always room for improvement, and there’s a
bargaining round coming up. I think teachers need to have
realistic expectations around that. But we’re going
in—
CORIN 15% is
not
realistic?
CHRIS Well,
we’re going into it with good faith, and I’m not going
to get into the specifics of
it.
CORIN But what
about that issue of—? I mean, as you say, it’s not just
money. If you’re going to attract teachers, and you’ve
got a massive shortage, you’re struggling to find people
in Auckland, aren’t you going to need to lift the prestige
of the teaching profession over time? I mean, what sort of a
guarantee can you give the teachers that in five or six
years’ time, it’s something worthwhile doing for a
long-term
career?
CHRIS Look,
it is something that’s worthwhile doing, and actually, one
of the things that we need to have an honest conversation
with the teaching profession about is that teachers are the
best ambassadors for their profession. So we want them
promoting teaching as a desirable job to do, something
that’s incredibly rewarding, because that’s going to
have a big impact on the number of people who want to go
into teaching. So we need to work with teachers to get them
to help us promote the
profession.
CORIN Where
do you sit on that issue, for example, of the higher cost of
living in Auckland? Would you ever consider giving extra
money to Auckland teachers as a
bonus?
CHRIS Well,
I understand that’s likely to be something that comes up
in this year’s bargaining round, so of course, we’ll
consider it if that’s what’s being asked for. But there
are a whole host of issues there, many of which relate not
just to education but housing and other things that the
government’s working
on.
CORIN But
that’s interesting, though, because the last government
wasn’t too keen on that. You would consider some sort of
an added payment to teachers in Auckland? Because obviously,
they just can’t live near their school that they’re
teaching at, because of the housing
costs.
CHRIS Look,
like I’ve said, that’s something for bargaining. And if
that’s requested through the bargaining round, if that’s
something that is bid for, then of course, I think we’re
duty-bound to consider
it.
CORIN All
right, let’s take another question. Jack and Esme
Robertson noted from 2014 to 2017, the number of teachers
increased by 1566. ‘Mr Hipkins is promising the same. So
is it true that new teachers in the budget is just business
as
usual?’
CHRIS Well,
that’s right. And we’ve never said anything other than
that this is about keeping up with population growth. So
this is about making sure we’ve got enough teachers in our
classrooms to cope with what is the largest increase in roll
numbers that we’ve seen in several
decades.
CORIN How
are you going to, then, address the— If this is just
getting you up to scratch, and you’ve got that massive
shortage in Auckland— You put $9 million in at the end of
last year, didn’t you? Is there more money coming to do
that?
CHRIS Well,
there was more money in this year’s budget around
recruiting and training and retaining teachers in schools,
and of course, we’re going to have to keep doing a lot
more. But look, teacher training in New Zealand is a problem
area for us. We’ve seen, I think, about a 40% reduction
over the last decade in the number of people training to be
teachers. So we’re going to have to turn that
around.
CORIN And
you’ll get some from
overseas?
CHRIS Yes,
we’ve had just over 100 people who we’ve paid for the
relocation of, and we’ve got about 100 more places
available through that
scheme.
CORIN All
right, another question. Cameron Meads asked, ‘When is the
government going to repeal the Voluntary Student Membership
or VSM?’ That’s for tertiary students, right? They’re
unions. You can get rid of
that?
CHRIS Well,
that’s something that we haven’t yet considered. It
wasn’t in our election manifesto. I know students will be
pushing for this; we’re happy to talk to them about
that.
CORIN So a
return to compulsory student unionism, effectively, isn’t
it?
CHRIS Well, it
might not be a return to compulsory student unionism. I
think maybe that ship has sailed. But we’ll certainly sit
down and talk to them about how we can ensure that students
have a strong voice in their education, post-school
education around the
country.
CORIN All
right, and one more. Hamish Barwick says, ‘Why did Mr
Hipkins pick former national education minister Sir Lockwood
Smith as the guardian of his new education
review?’
CHRIS Well,
that’s a good question, actually, and one of the things
that I said in that summit was I think this is something
that we should be aiming to reach out beyond party politics
and involve a good cross-section of New Zealand. Lockwood
Smith is a former minister of education, a very passionate
advocate for education, I think quite a visionary around
education. I didn’t agree with everything that he did when
he was minister of education, but actually, if you want to
reach across the political divide, you need to speak to
people on the other
side.
CORIN On the
issue of Tomorrow’s Schools, which is your big,
overarching review of the structure – I know they’ve
still got to do their report – but what is your gut
feeling? Does there need to be a move back to more central
control? Has it got too difficult for particularly
disadvantaged areas to run their schools, given they don’t
have the resources or the parents they need? Is it time to
shift it
back?
CHRIS Well,
we know that Tomorrow’s Schools has worked really well in
some areas. We’ve had really good parental engagement in
some areas, and that’s helped. We know that there have
been some real weaknesses. We know, for example, the
management of school property has not been done very well
under Tomorrow’s Schools. So we’ve got school buildings
up and down the country that haven’t been properly
maintained over the 30-plus or around 30 years of
Tomorrow’s Schools. And we’re now having to clean up
that mess. So that clearly hasn’t worked. We know that in
some communities, they really struggle to get people to be
on boards of trustees, and therefore, that puts a lot more
pressure on the school
principal.
CORIN Sure.
So what’s your gut feeling? Do you have a
preference for which way it might
go?
CHRIS I don’t
think it’s going to be one silver bullet. It’s not about
saying, ‘Right, we’re not going to have boards of
trustees anymore.’ I think boards of trustees are likely
to still be there. But the role might change. It’s not
about saying ‘we’re going to do this, but not
that’.
CORIN Maybe
ease the burden for them a
bit.
CHRIS Yes,
it’s about easing the burden. It’s about focusing
principals and teachers, particularly, on teaching and
learning, rather than on whether the roof is
leaking.
CORIN Education
minister Chris Hipkins, thank you very much for your time on
Q+A.
Please find the transcript attached and links to
part 1 and part 2 of the interview.
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TVNZ 1 and one hour later
on TVNZ 1 + 1.
Repeated Sunday evening at around
11:35pm. Streamed live at www.tvnz.co.nz
Thanks to the
support from NZ On Air.
Q+A is also on Facebook + Twitter + YouTube