Moths to combat horehound
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2018
Two moths may now be
imported into New Zealand to combat invasive horehound,
following a decision by the Environmental Protection
Authority (EPA).
The Horehound Biocontrol Group, a collective of farmers whose crops are infested with horehound, applied to introduce the horehound plume moth and horehound clearwing moth to attack the weed. Its application was supported by the Ministry for Primary Industries’ (MPI) sustainable farming fund.
The two moths attack
horehound in different ways. The larvae of the plume moth
feed on horehound leaves, while those of the clearwing moth
feed on the roots.
The applicant group noted a recent
survey estimating horehound costs to New Zealand dryland
farmers at almost $7 million per year. The weed is a serious
threat to the viability of some farms, it is said, as it
establishes strongly in hill and high-country, especially
when the valuable crop, lucerne, is dormant in the winter.
One farmer noted that horehound quickly grows out of
control, resulting in lucerne paddocks failing well before
their expected 10-year life cycle.
“The EPA received 40 submissions on this application, 39 of which were in favour,” noted its General Manager of Hazardous Substances and New Organisms, Dr Fiona Thomson-Carter. “The Department of Conservation and MPI both supported the application. MPI noted the negative impact of chemicals on the environment where spraying was used, as against the long-term benefits of bio-control.”
A firm that produces medicinal products using horehound weed, told the EPA that harvesting the weed may become difficult if a biocontrol agent was released. But the decision-making committee found that, in unmanaged environments, the moths would be the only means used to control horehound, so herbalists should be able to continue their harvesting, which is done by hand. The committee further noted that farmers and herbalists could come to agreements regarding access to and management of horehound-infested areas to allow harvesting.
“The
EPA decision-making committee heard evidence from farmers
that lucerne is increasingly being used in the high country
to mitigate the effects of drought. They explained that
lucerne flourishes in dry conditions, and provides
high-quality feed for longer periods than traditional
pasture grasses. Farmers see it as an ally in their fight
against climate change,” Dr Thomson-Carter said.
“The
EPA accepted that there are no native species related to
horehound that would be at risk if these two moths were
introduced. Both were released in Australia 20 years ago,
and there was no evidence of adverse effects on non-target
species there.”
In coming to its decision to approve the application without controls, the EPA noted that it did not identify any risks to native or taonga species, ecosystems or traditional Māori values, practices, health or well-being.
“The decision-making committee also concluded that introducing the two moths would curb the vigour and abundance of horehound in New Zealand, thus reducing its progressive invasion of new habitats, and sustaining biodiversity. The committee further noted the potential beneficial effect of reducing the use of herbicides that can kill native or other beneficial plants when used incorrectly,” Dr Thomson-Carter said.”
ends