Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

First National: drug rules a ‘dogs breakfast’ for Landlords

First National Real Estate Chief Executive Bob Brereton has hit out at Government moves to weaken drug laws saying that the proposals are a ‘dogs breakfast’ and a further attack on Landlords in the wake of the controversial ‘Gluckman Report’ released earlier this year.

Last week the Government announced a suite of changes including an intention to amend the ‘Misuse of Drugs’ Act to ease up on people caught with personal possession of illegal drugs. Under the changes, people caught possessing and using drugs will face lighter charges while, on the flip side, synthetics will now be classified as class A drugs, giving the police more power to crack down on drug makers and drug dealers.

The latest changes come on top of a bombshell report, released in May, which suggested that there was no risk to humans from third hand exposure to houses where methamphetamine has been consumed and which dramatically increased the levels of meth which could be present in building structures before the house would be regarded as unsafe.

However, according to Mr Brereton, these changes are based on untested assumptions which put the health of tenants, and the property of Landlords, at risk”.

“Just as with the Gluckman report there’s absolutely no new research to back up these latest changes – which appear to be more about political ideology and the need to keep coalition parties happy, than doing anything to improve the lot of drug users”.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Mr Brereton says that the changes will simply add yet another burden to Landlords, already reeling from the changes to acceptable Meth levels announced back in May.

“Back then we asked who would compensate the owners of the tens of thousands of houses which were deemed to be contaminated prior to the Gluckman announcement and which had been remediated at the cost of many millions? Who picks up the tab for the loss of sale price, the LIM registrations, the costs of remediation, and the many Real Estate Salespeople who have inadvertently had their careers ruined through the existing levels?”

“Now, as a result of these latest changes, we’re going to see even more open use of drugs in rental properties – along with all of the social consequences that this will bring”.

Mr Brereton says that the changes ‘smack of a larger agenda at play”.

“There were suggestions, in the wake of the Gluckman report, that it was part of a greater and more subversive agenda to ‘normalise’ and then legalise drug use. Yesterdays announcement is certainly a curious step further along that road”.

“But what about the consequences? While New Zealand wallows in the mire of a raft of changes that are out of touch with the rest of the world - tenants can smoke and shoot up with impunity - out of the reach of prosecution for possession or use and out of the reach of the landlord”.

“Meanwhile, those who damage property while in this impaired state of psychoactive hell will be putting the visiting Property Manager, Landlord, neighbor, or tradesmen at risk every time they enter the property”.


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.