Labour goes back to the future on asset sales
15.11.19
The party that sold off the BNZ, NZ Rail, Petrocorp, Postbank, the Shipping Corporation, Air New Zealand, the State Insurance Office, the Tourist Hotel Corporation and a host of other New Zealand assets is at it again – with the assistance of its coalition partners NZ First and the Greens.
Despite a commitment in its policy
to “keep forestry in New Zealand hands by requiring the
sale of logging rights on land over 50 hectares to be
approved by the Overseas Investment Office for overseas
purchasers”, Labour is facilitating the sale of thousands
of hectares of farmland to overseas forestry companies and
by-passing the Overseas Investment Office in the
process.
50 Shades of Green is right to protest against
that hypocrisy and the country’s urban community should
join farmers on the front line protesting as well.
In what appeared to be a ‘turnaround in thinking’ in the 2011/2014 period, Labour’s Annette King wrote in a post on the Labour Party website on November 3rd 2014 under the heading “An asset sale is an asset sale is……”. In the post she says “Dressing it up as anything other than an asset sale is duplicitous.”
And Auckland Mayor Phil
Goff told a campaign rally in central Auckland just 5 days
before the 2011 general election “Selling assets did
nothing to prepare for the future.
Then Leader of the
Labour Party, Mr Goff told the rally “Two words - asset
sales - had defined the election campaign”
"It simply doesn't work. It's just dumb to sell them. Only a Labour government can save our assets from being flogged off to foreign owners”.
But now Labour’s gone back to the
future, allowing one foreign investor to become the
country’s third biggest private landowner in just four
years.
Even more stupidly it’s allowed another recent
overseas purchaser that describes its core business as ‘a
supplier of bulk carbon credits to large energy and oil
companies’ to purchase significant farmland. Planting
trees for this company is just incidental to it making big
profits by facilitating corporate pollution of the
atmosphere.
Land Information Minister and Green MP Eugenie Sage has again proven that the Greens are the dinosaurs of the international green movement by justifying the sale approvals which she personally signed off on by saying New Zealand needed foreign investment in forestry to meet its billion trees programme and climate change targets.
Ms Sage clearly doesn’t know that government investment starting in the 1920’s is what facilitated thousands of hectares of New Zealand forest and it could and should be doing it now.
A Social Credit government would put an
immediate stop to the sale of farmland to overseas buyers,
progressively return to New Zealand ownership land already
sold, and radically re-write the Overseas Investment Office
rules.
It would invest in land-appropriate forestry
planting and scrap the Emissions Trading Scheme which is
just another financial fraud, and is costing taxpayers
billions of dollars. The climate has now been monetised,
opened up to speculation, and that has not contributed one
iota to reduction in emissions.
Instead of penalising our wealth producers we will make Reserve Bank credit available to assist businesses, territorial authorities and other groups in making the transition towards a carbon neutral New Zealand.
“There’s a tidal wave of applications from overseas entities that want to snap up New Zealand’s best agricultural land and agricultural and horticultural businesses”.
“Our view is that’s not good for the long term future of New Zealanders so we’re putting a stake in the ground”.
Social Credit is putting its money where its mouth is and on October 4th filed papers in the High Court in Wellington to seek judicial review of the Overseas Investment Office decision to grant approval for the takeover of Westland Milk Products by Chinese conglomerate Inner Mongolian Yili.
Donations to assist
with the High Court action can be made on the Give-A-Little
page set up for the legal challenge (Westland Milk Sale
Judicial Review).
Donations will only be used for this
case or any other subsequent actions the party may take to
oppose overseas entities buying up the
country.
Ends