On Newshub Nation: Simon Shepherd Interviews Dr Ashley Bloomfield
The COVID-19
outbreak in New Zealand is an evolving
situation. Prior to
today’s update at midday, Simon Shepherd began by asking
Director-general of health Dr Ashley Bloomfield about the 11
cases announced on Friday. Simon
Shepherd: 11 new cases on Friday, links to travel for most,
five tests are still being investigated. That seems a bit
ambiguous. Does that mean there’s unconfirmed community
transmission? Ashley Bloomfield: Yes,
well, as I said at my stand-up yesterday, some of the
results are coming through in the morning before we do the
update, usually early afternoon and until we’ve got all
the information and there’s been a very detailed interview
with each of those cases, it’s difficult for us to confirm
whether or not there’s a link to overseas travel. So when
I do my update later today, I’ll be able to talk about
those cases that came through yesterday morning. Now, one of
the good things about the fact that we’re getting those
tests through the next day is it’s because there is a big
increase in testing happening and so the labs are running a
number of batches during the day and some of those into the
evening. So we don’t get the results till the following
morning. OK, great. Well, I’d like to
talk about the testing in a moment. We are expecting
community transmission to be confirmed. So when that
happens, what exact changes will that
trigger? Well, if we find there is
community transmission, obviously we will continue to do our
contact-tracing as part of identifying cases, close
contacts, and self-isolation. But we will then think about
putting in place other measures to help avoid further
transmission in the community and we’ve already seen at
the moment people being encouraged to look at their plans
for, for example, working from home. We’ve been putting
out really strong messages about physical distancing. And I
think we’ve seen people respond really well to that.
There’s been the advice this week and the strengthening of
expectations around large gatherings, so no more than 500
outside or 100 inside. But some of the other things we can
do to help increase physical distancing may be, for example,
asking some shops to close or asking restaurants and bars to
close, could be further down the
track. Yep, all right. What about, we’ve
just had the Education Minister on the show and he’s
talking about potential plans for geographical lockdown. I
mean, what could that look like? Would that mean that
domestic travel out of the region would be not
allowed? Well, that could be an option
and one of the ways, if we think we’ve got localized
community spread, would be to constrain movement in and out
of a region and also to ask anyone who had been in that
region, but is now elsewhere in the country, to go into
self-isolation, so that could be a very effective way of not
only stopping transmission in that community, but preventing
any further onward transmission elsewhere in the
country. And is that what you’re
expecting to happen first – a geographical lockdown –
and how close are we to that? Well, at
the moment, we haven’t got any confirmed cases of
community transmission. So it’s hard to say how close we
are. What we have got is very well-developed thinking and
plans about what that might look like and that, indeed, as
you say, could mean constraining travel in and out of a
region. It could mean thinking about a geographical closure
of schools and other educational institutions. It could mean
stopping shops and pubs and cafes from opening. So all these
options are on the table. The key aim of course here being
to stop that wider community
transmission. What do you say to people
that seem to be ignoring the advice or even the laws around
gathering of more than 100 people? I talk about church
services. We’ve had the Destiny Church saying it’s going
ahead despite the ban. I mean, what do you say to
them? Well, actually, I think the Destiny
Church will be rethinking. That was earlier in the week. I
know during the week a number of denominations have called
off all church services for the time being. Very
responsible, I think. Not just to their parishioners, but
also to the wider community. And we also know that the
Government does have powers to enforce the 100 maximum on
gatherings. So if needs be, those powers will be
used. OK. The Education Minister also on
the show just confirmed that children who have been taken
out of school by their parents perhaps are posing a greater
risk to the community because they’re unsupervised. What
should be done by that, because they can’t be contacted
and traced if they’re not in
school? Well, I think the important
thing, whether children are in school or out of school or,
indeed, whether adults are at work or working from home, the
key thing here is to maintain that physical distancing and
make sure that we can reduce the likelihood of transmission,
whether it’s between children in a school setting, whether
it’s in the family home, because that’s where we’ve
seen, for example, in China, most of the transmission was
happening inside family homes, and even in New Zealand
we’ve seen a number of related cases inside individual
homes. The advantage of children being at school, as
you’ve said, is we then know where they were and if we do
need to do contact-tracing and self-isolation, we can do
that. And we had an example of that during the week at Logan
Park High School where we were able to quickly identify 150
close contacts and, not only that, we took the decision to
test them and were able to reassure both that school
community and the wider community that there weren’t at
that point any wider positive cases. OK, so
you mention the ramp-up of testing just a little bit
earlier. You say we have the capacity heading towards 1500
tests a day. We have 30,000 test kits in stock, I
understand. That’s what you said. So, worst case scenario,
that would only last a maximum of 20 days. Is that
enough? So, yes, I didn’t give the
number of 30,000, but we’ve been working very hard over
the last two or three days to ensure the supply of the test
kids, and that includes the swabs and the reagent that the
laboratories use to run the test and there’s a lot of work
going on. We have different machines in different
laboratories. But what I can say is we’re comfortable
we’ve secured a really good supply
there. OK, what can you tell us about that?
We’ve got more coming? Who’s actually going to sell this
stuff to us around the world, because everybody wants
it? That’s right, they do want it. But
we do have good supply chains and there is reagent on its
way to New Zealand when we have been able to also secure
additional kits out of Singapore, which is great. So, it is
important we can do the testing of everyone who needs
testing and that’s one of the ways we can find cases early
and then contain. And also, it gives us a view, for example,
the last couple of days there have been around 1,000 tests
both days, we know the number of positive tests from
yesterday – we added the 11 in – so if we think about
that, about 1% of tests are positive at the moment. For the
ones we had information on, there’s that link to overseas
travel. So it’s giving us a really good picture of knowing
when – and early - we might have community transmission
occurring, so that’s encouraging. OK,
you’ve just ramped the testing up to 1000 a day, but
earlier this week a total was 530 that had been done – I
think Monday or Tuesday. So do you think that we haven’t
been aggressive enough in the testing that the criteria has
been too restrictive and that we don’t really have the
full picture of COVID-19 in our
community? Well, what we were doing was
getting good technical advice on the case definition and
that changed very regularly as more information became
available from overseas and also as we had an idea of what
the risk was in New Zealand. I think the increase in testing
in the last few days and the increase in cases, all
reflecting people who have travelled back – many of them
aiming to get back to New Zealand – and of course coming
from a wider range of areas that have got outbreaks –
particularly Europe and the USA – whereas prior to that
there wasn’t those outbreaks in those other
countries. OK, talk about the restriction
on who can come now. So it’s just citizens and residents.
Do you believe that we’re a little bit behind on this? Did
we go too late, because we’ve got these incidents of
tourists travelling round the South Island not
self-isolating? Have we missed an opportunity
there? Well, New Zealand’s actually one
of the countries that’s led the world on travel
restrictions. Right from early on there was the restriction
in place from China. Iran was added very quickly, before, I
think, every other country. We’ve then strengthened those
restrictions and then further strengthening later this week
to exclude even visitors, so I think we’ve been proactive
in ensuring we’re sealing the border. These are big
decisions. This is the first time ever this decision’s
been taken at the border. So they’re not small decisions.
I think we’ve been very alert and we’ve responded at the
right time. I appreciate that these are
very big decisions and have massive impacts on communities
and the economy, but still, since the travel restrictions
were announced and then came into effect on Monday, arrivals
at Auckland Airport were still in the thousands per day.
They don’t know the exact numbers, but they were down 44%
on normal level. That’s still about 7,000 a day. Is 7,000
a day a missed opportunity to keep COVID-19 under
control? Two things there. First of all,
the arrivals have dropped precipitously during the week, so
they’re much, much lower now. The second thing is that
people coming through the airport – it’s really clear
what the expectation is around them to declare any symptoms
that they might have. A couple of days ago there were over
100 people assessed at Auckland Airport who either had
symptoms or it wasn’t clear that they might have symptoms.
They were assessed by nursing staff. But everyone coming
through is not just clear about what is expected of them,
but they know they have to go into self-isolation for 14
days. Where they seem to have an objection, then there is a
conversation there and then and they have to show evidence
that they intend to self-isolate and again we’ve seen some
people who haven’t done that have been visited by the
police and arrangements made. All right,
let’s just talk about equipment again. You mention that
you’re sourcing some stuff from Singapore. Can you tell us
exactly how many tests we are going to have for the
community? I don’t know where the 30,000 figure came from,
but that is a miniscule amount of the
population. The important thing here is
that we test the right people. Because not only is it the
test kits, of course, our laboratory staff need to make sure
that we are not wearing them out either. And so we need to
make sure that we’re doing the tests on the right people.
We have seen an increase in testing. I’m confident in the
supply of the test kits. But we also need to make sure that
we continue to test the right people and we are finding the
cases and not just testing people, for example, who don’t
have symptoms. What about personal
protective equipment for medical staff? Various news stories
come in. Somebody told me a DHB – they only had two weeks.
You said yesterday that some masks had actually perished
whilst they had been in storage. How many masks did you
lose? Are you confident that we have enough of personal
protective equipment for the health
staff? That’s an area I am confident in
and I can say that because since 2009, when we had the Swine
Flu pandemic, we have maintained and rotated out of our
national store, a very large supply of personal protective
equipment, including the 18 million masks. And not only
that, we do have mask production on shore and that can
produce around 200,000 masks a day. So that’s an area I
think we’re well covered. Yes, some DHBs did find that
their stores they had set aside had expired, and we’ve
been able to replace those. Was that a lot
of equipment that expired? I don’t know
the exact details, but the important thing is we were able
to replace that and so all DHBs either have or have access
to all the PPE that they will need. All
right, just finally, a lot of the response to COVID-19 has
changed recently because of the paper that was done by
London’s Imperial College. So, we were flattening a curve.
Now we’re talking about a wave of curves we have to deal
with. But they say that this could go to 12 to 18 months,
until a vaccine is available. Is that the picture that
you’re seeing for New Zealand? It is
the picture and we need to be ready to be in this for a long
haul. If we want to avoid that really large peak that would
lead to a high number of cases and potentially create real
problems for our healthcare system, we’ve got time to
ensure that we can follow that longer course. We need to go
early and make sure that we keep that peak below the health
system capacity and that’s the course of action that
we’re taking. Dr Ashley Bloomfield, we
appreciate the work you’re doing and your time this
morning. Thank you very
much. Cases are rising and testing is
ramping up.
Currently there are 53 confirmed cases
of the virus in this country.