Celebrating 25 Years of Scoop
Special: Up To 25% Off Scoop Pro Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

A Long-Overdue Review Of Health And Safety

The New Zealand Initiative warmly welcomes the government’s review of health and safety regulation. 

“Current rules impose enormous compliance costs often for little safety benefit. Rigorous cost-benefit assessment could shift emphasis and cost from areas where the rules provide little benefit to areas where far more good could be done. But that kind of rigour is less common than it should be,” said Initiative Chair Roger Partridge. 

The Initiative pointed to stronger cost-benefit assessment, as well as revisiting the rules around personal liability for health and safety outcomes, as promising starting points for review. 

Dr Bryce Wilkinson, Senior Fellow with the Initiative, pointed to scaffolding rules as exemplar of ill-justified regulation. 

Dr Wilkinson said, “Rules for scaffolding for preventing falls from height were not properly assessed before they were implemented. And rough estimates produced afterwards suggested the cost of preventing an injury, through scaffolding rules, was over three times higher than the cost of preventing an injury from a road accident. If those numbers were right, then we could have prevented three times as many injuries, at lower cost, by focusing on roading improvements.” 

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

He also noted the rules encourage people to do their own roofing work, even where doing so is riskier than contracting with a professional. 

Evaluating existing health and safety regulations against the cost of reducing accidents through roading improvements could provide a reasonable benchmark. 

Partridge noted the pernicious influence of rules setting personal liability for health and safety outcomes in driving risk aversion. “The existing rules seem to have particularly bad effects when councils or government are contracting for infrastructure improvements. Proper investigation in this area seems very worthwhile.” 

Dr Bryce Wilkinson's research note A matter of balance: Regulating safety can be found on The New Zealand Initiative website.

“Pike River no excuse for bad regulation”, an early warning of potential issues in the new regime, is available on the website. 

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.