Views on human gamete and embryo research wanted
Media Release
15 December 2006
New Zealanders’ views on human gamete and embryo research wanted
New Zealanders’ views on allowing human gamete and embryo research and, if so, the conditions which should apply, are being sought by the Government’s advisory committee on assisted reproductive technology.
ACART, the Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology, today published a discussion paper which will inform Government policy on this issue. Use of Gametes and Embryos in Human Reproductive Research: Determining Policy for New Zealand presents information from a variety of perspectives: scientific, ethical, cultural, legal and policy as well as seeking submissions to the Committee.
“New Zealanders have had limited opportunity to date to influence policy on gamete and embryo research” says Professor Sylvia Rumball, Chair of ACART.
“We expect that there will be many different views and ACART hopes to hear them all before it decides what advice it will give to the Minister of Health. I encourage all New Zealanders to take part in this discussion.”
Internationally, scientific developments involving the use of gametes and embryos in research are taking place. These developments further our understanding of normal growth and development. New Zealand researchers would like the opportunity to contribute to this work. However, the use of gametes and embryos for research raises ethical, cultural and spiritual issues, which must be considered. ACART will provide the Minister of Health with advice on the use of gametes and embryos in research following this consultation.
Submissions close on 2 March 2007. Please visit ACART’s website for a copy of the discussion paper and further information: www.newhealth.govt.nz/acart.
For further media information contact:
Chair, Advisory Committee on Assisted
Reproductive Technology (ACART)
Professor Sylvia
Rumball
Phone: (06) 350 5249
(021) 535
001
Media advisor:
Ministry of Health
Rebecca
Walsh
Phone: (04) 496 2115
(021) 277
5411
Questions and Answers
What is the HART
Act?
The Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004
provides the legislative framework that prohibits or allows
some procedures, and requires that others be subject to
ethical review on a case by case basis before going ahead.
The Act identifies where further advice is required on areas
of treatment or research, as well as procedures for
developing this advice.
What is ACART?
ACART is an
independent Advisory Committee set up under the HART Act to
advise the Minister on assisted reproductive procedures and
human reproductive research. It has 12 members.
ACART
must include:
• one or more members with expertise in
assisted reproductive procedures
• one or more members
with expertise in human reproductive research
• one or
more members with expertise in ethics
• one or more
Māori members with expertise in Māori customary values and
practice and the ability to articulate issues from a Māori
perspective
• one or more members with the ability to
articulate issues from a consumer perspective
• one or
more members with expertise in relevant areas of the
law
• one or more members with the ability to
articulate the interests of children. Any person appointed
under this requirement must be the Commissioner for
Children, or a representative or employee of the person who
holds that office.
At least half the members of ACART must be lay persons.
ACART is a diverse committee that has been composed to represent a wide-cross section of New Zealand society.
What is human reproductive research?
Human
reproductive research means research that uses or creates a
human gamete (sperm or eggs) or a human embryo. This topic
is the focus of ACART’s current discussion paper and
consultation. There is a link, however, between research and
infertility treatment in that treatment is one possible
source of embryos for research; and also people will need to
make decisions about what to do with any embryos that will
not be implanted – one possible use is donation for
research.
What is an assisted reproductive
procedure?
An assisted reproductive procedure is a
procedure performed for the purpose of assisting human
reproduction (ARP). The most commonly referred to ARP is in
vitro fertilization (IVF) where sperm and eggs are combined
outside the body and an embryo is subsequently replaced into
the uterus of the woman.
ACART will be consulting separately on assisted reproductive procedures, in April 2007.
What is a gamete?
The HART Act defines a gamete
as
• a human egg or sperm, whether mature or not,
or
• any other cell (whether naturally occurring or
artificially formed or modified) that
- contains only one
copy of all or most chromosomes and
- is capable of being
used for reproductive purposes.
What is an embryo?
The
HART Act defines an embryo as including a zygote and a cell
or group of cells that has the capacity to develop into an
individual; but does not include stem cells derived from an
embryo.
Under the HART Act, it is an offence to possess or use an embryo outside the womb beyond 14 days. All references, therefore, to research using embryos mean an embryo up to and including the 14th day after its formation (sometimes called the ‘pre-embryo’)
Why might we
conduct research using human gametes and
embryos?
Internationally, scientific developments
involving the use of gametes and embryos in research are
taking place. These developments have the potential to
further our understanding of various disease states as well
as our understanding of normal growth and development. New
Zealand researchers would like the opportunity to contribute
to this work.
In ACART’s discussion paper, the use of
gametes and embryos for research could potentially result in
any or all of the following four purposes:
• contribution to an understanding of fundamental
science, for example, a better understanding of the
developmental pathways that lead to the birth of healthy
babies can contribute to an understanding of the causes of
foetal developmental abnormalities
• contribution to
understanding of fertility and
infertility
• contribution to prevention of hereditary
diseases, for example, through using pre-implantation
genetic diagnosis to check for genetic or chromosomal
disorders in embryos in order to select only healthy embryos
for implantation
• contribution to treating human
disease in general through, for example, the potential for
embryonic stem cells to give rise to any type of cell and
thus replace cells lost through injury or disease (such
application is, however, unlikely to be realised in the near
future).
Where will the embryos for any approved research
come from?
This will be decided following consultation.
However, in its discussion paper, ACART identifies three
potential sources of embryos for use in
research:
• Non-viable embryos that lack the capacity
to develop into an individual even if
implanted.
• Surplus embryos left over from IVF
procedures
• Embryos created specifically for research
either by IVF procedures or through cloning.
Currently, in New Zealand, only non-viable embryos can be used for research.
What about embryonic stem cells?
Embryonic
stem cells are cells found in the early embryo that have not
yet developed into a specialised cell type (ie, they are
undifferentiated) and have the potential to form all of the
200 types of cell that make up the human body (ie, they are
pluripotent). Once isolated, they can be grown in culture
to form embryonic stem cell lines in the laboratory and used
for research purposes.
Once established, human embryonic stem cell lines are not embryos because they lack the capacity to develop into an individual. Therefore, their use is not covered by the HART Act.
Why is ACART consulting
the public?
ACART is consulting the public because
assisted reproductive procedures and human reproductive
research are important issues for our society. People have a
range of views based on their values which gives rise to
significant ethical and moral debate.
The HART Act requires ACART to consult the public before giving advice to the Minister of Health or issuing guidelines to the Ethics Committee.
How is ACART conducting public
consultation?
ACART is holding a multi-faceted
consultation that involves:
• release of a discussion
paper that outlines the issues involved with the use of
gametes and embryos in research – people are encouraged to
make written submissions
• holding focus
groups
• running public meetings, hui and
fono
• hearing formal oral submissions.
Information on where and when meetings will take place will be published on ACART’s website early in 2007 and advertised in newspapers close to the time they will be held.
How does ACART’s consultation fit with the Bioethics Council’s recent dialogue – Talking Embryos
ACART has the statutory responsibility to consult and advise the Minister on future policy on human reproductive research in New Zealand.
The Bioethics Council held the Talking Embryos dialogue to raise awareness and to encourage New Zealanders to think about embryo research prior to ACART’s consultation. The Bioethics Council will use the submissions people made to it during the Talking Embryos dialogue to make its submission to ACART. However, even if you made a submission to the Bioethics Council, ACART would like to hear from you directly.
Why did the Ministry of Health develop guidelines for using cells from established embryonic stem cell lines for research before ACART consulted the public?
The use of cells from established embryonic stem cells does not fall under the HART Act or ACART’s responsibilities, though the development of new stem cell lines from embryos does.
The Ministry of Health will review its guidelines following the outcome of ACART’s public consultation and consideration on research using human embryos, including their use to derive stem cell lines.
When do submissions close?
Submissions close at
5 pm on Friday 2 March 2007.
Who do I send my submission
to?
Send your submission to the ACART
Secretariat:
acart@moh.govt.nz
ACART Secretariat
P O
Box 5013
Wellington
Can I make an oral
submission?
Yes, the HART Act requires ACART to hear oral
submissions if it considers that a significant number of
people wish to make an oral submission. Making an oral
submission provides you with an opportunity to explain your
point of view to ACART in person. It also provides ACART
with the opportunity to ask supplementary questions during
your oral submission.
If you want to make an oral
submission, you must let the ACART Secretariat know as soon
as possible, and not later than 2 March
2007:
(acart@moh.govt.nz; (04) 496 2000; or P O Box 5013,
Wellington).
Can I have a say about which infertility
treatments we should approve for use in New Zealand?
Yes,
ACART will be holding another consultation in early 2007 on
the clinical application of assisted reproductive
procedures. It will cover such issues as surrogacy and
pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.
How will ACART
formulate its advice to the Minister of Health?
ACART’s
advice to the Minister of Health will be based in part on
the submissions arising from this consultation. However,
the submissions will be considered alongside other
considerations such as existing policy in New Zealand,
scientific and ethical analysis and the principles of the
HART Act. ACART will advise the Minister by 30 June 2007.
The Government will make the final decisions about New
Zealand’s policy on gamete and embryo research.
What is happening in other countries?
Other countries have a range of positions on embryo research policy and legislation. The examples are set out below are grouped into four broad positions.
Position A
The use of embryos in research is
banned.
The use of established human embryonic stem cells
in research is banned. Position B
The use of embryos in
research is banned.
The use of established human
embryonic stem cells in research is not banned. Position
C
The use of surplus IVF embryos in research is not
banned.
The use of established human embryonic stem
cells derived from such embryos in research is not
banned. Position D
The use of embryos created for
research and surplus IVF embryos in research is not banned.
The use of established human embryonic stem cells
derived from such embryos in research is not
banned.
Ireland
Austria
Norway
Poland
Germany
Italy
Canada
Australia
France
Czech
Republic
Denmark
Finland
Greece
Hungary
Russia
Spain
Switzerland
Taiwan United
Kingdom
Singapore
Belgium
China
India
Israel
Netherlands
South
Korea
Sweden
The United States is not included in this table as there has been little by way of regulation, and what regulation there has been does not apply to the private sector. Further, regulatory positions vary widely between states.
Where can I get more information?
You
can get more information from ACART’s website at
www.newhealth.govt.nz/acart
Ends