Project Canvas: Internet Killer?
http://thediffusiongroup.com/blogs/tdg-opinions/pages/project-canvas-free-to-air-savior-or-internet-killer.aspx
Project Canvas – Free-to-Air Savior or Internet Killer?
What do you get when you cross broadcast television with the Internet? Is the joint offering like the Internet, open and unregulated, or like broadcast TV, strictly controlled and heavily regulated? I think there are many companies, governments and NGOs asking themselves this one. Well, if you live in the UK the answer could be a project code named Canvas. And by the looks of things, it will be the Internet that suffers! In two consultation documents released by the BBC last week, the picture that emerges of Project Canvas is both confusing and a little disturbing.
Canvas – A Short Hop
from Kangaroo
The BBC, in partnership with Channel
4 and ITV, has just had their plan for an online video on
demand platform, called Project Kangaroo, quashed by the
Office of Fair Trading as anti-competitive. Undeterred by
this failure, the BBC is now proposing to save free-to-air
TV by uniting it with broadband in a hybrid “free”
service dubbed “Project Canvas.” Widely touted as the
successor to Freeview, the service would:
“...promote a standards based open environment for internet-connected digital terrestrial and digital satellite television devices.”1
This wide-ranging project, which would establish a platform suitable for Kangaroo, seeks to create a standard for the delivery of Internet content to the television and drive adoption of the standard through partnering with CE manufacturers, ISPs and content providers. A noble effort indeed! Keeping free-to-air TV vital and competitive with PayTV services was the key driver behind creating Freeview in the first place. But wait, don’t you need a broadband subscription to enjoy these new benefits? The answer, of course, is yes. So, if we are to believe the Canvas proposition, the way to save free-to-air TV is to turn it into a pay service!
But why is the BBC proposing such a broad project in the first place? Is it really necessary or can the core goals of the corporation be achieved with a much simpler approach?
Not
Another Browser Standard, Please!
One of the main
things the Canvas proposal does is seek to establish a new
standard for the delivery of Internet content on the TV. The
project proposes doing this in two ways: establish a
standard based Internet TV browser and provide a “guide”
to allow the content to be found. However, there are already
two suitable browser standards in existence: CE-HTML, part
of the CE-2014-A standard, and WTVML, aka ETSI TS 102 322.
Why the BBC feels a third is necessary is mystery.
The adoption of a “guide” standard is also very contentious. The importance of the guide in the tightly controlled world of linear television is well established. But how is this applied in the open market of Internet media? The Internet certainly can’t be squeezed into the traditional grid guide offered on the TV today. One of the strengths of the Internet is that a content provider can define their own look and feel. These providers certainly won’t appreciate the BBC defining their appearance on the TV. The area of TV search and discovery is desperate for innovation and there are many companies working in this area. For example, Intel/Yahoo! has the widget bar approach, game consoles are experimenting with virtual worlds, Blinkx is working on contextual search engines. The last thing that’s needed is the BBC setting in stone how content is found on TV.
But perhaps more disturbing still is that the BBC clearly sees itself as one of the control points of the TV Internet world, as illustrated in the following statement from the proposition and public value case document:
“The BBC has an editorial opportunity to shape this market on behalf of audiences in a way that is consistent with its purposes.”
The description of Canvas sounds very much like a commercial UK venture called Miniweb2 which is currently running on the Sky satellite TV service. However, the BBC seems to go out of its way to exclude any mention of commercial ventures such as MiniWeb and PayTV companies participating in the project. Since Sky and Virgin are both major UK ISPs, including them in the discussion could well lead to a unified standard for hybrid Internet/TV across PayTV and Free-to-Air. Wouldn’t a unified platform be better for the British Public? There’s even a chance it could result in an International Standard. Remember that TV is finally just becoming unified behind HD, it would be a shame for hybrid standards to fragment around the world.
The BBC has been doing a great job delivering their content to the British people through the multiple outlets available, including the Internet. The iPlayer is a beacon to the rest of the world in how to do web delivery of TV and audio very well. Extending this approach and leveraging this market-leading technology might be a better approach. The BBC could simply chose to do the following:
- Create a version of iPlayer for WTVML or CE-HTML browser
- Make the iPlayer freely available to any device manufacturer implementing the browser
- Add the browser or browsers to the Freesat and Freeview STB specification
This would establish a hybrid TV platform, open to all comers, upon which the iPlayer is guaranteed to run. It helps seed the market by extending the existing platforms and drives demand by making the BBC content available on them.
The Canvas approach makes two huge mistakes:
- It does not take into account the whole UK TV industry
- It attempts to control or regulate the delivery of Internet content to the television
Taking a lighter approach avoids these problems completely leaving them in the truly open domain of the Internet, where they rightfully belong.
--
1 Consultation by the BBC Trust on an
application from the BBC Executive to define and promote an
IP Television Standard (‘Project Canvas’), February
2009
2 The author wishes to disclose that he
has previously done unrelated consulting work for Miniweb in
the US market.
ENDS