Cablegate: Media Reaction: U.S. And Cross-Strait
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
060811Z Apr 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 001644
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD -
ROBERT PALLADINO
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S. AND CROSS-STRAIT
RELATIONS, POPE JOHN PAUL II
1. Summary: Coverage of the Taipei dailies April 6
centered on the cross-Strait relations and local
politics. All the major Chinese-language Taipei
dailies reported on their front pages that President
Chen Shui-bian decided in a meeting Tuesday that the
government will utilize laws to deal with any private
agreement reached with China without proper
authorization from the Taiwan government. Taiwan's
largest daily, the pro-independence "Liberty Times" ran
a banner headline on its front page that read:
"Effective management will be reinforced with regard to
trade across the Taiwan Strait. Front-page headline of
the centrist "China Times" also said "The Presidential
Office, the Executive Yuan and DPP put on the brake
with regard to mainland China heat." An editorial of
the "Liberty Times" continued to slash KMT Vice
Chairman P.K. Chiang's recent visit to China, citing a
U.S. official's comment on the inappropriate timing of
Chiang's visit in order to show that the KMT has
misinterpreted the United States' cross-Strait policy.
2. The death of Pope John Paul II also triggered
speculation in Taiwan about whether the Vatican will
switch diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China. A
limited-circulation, conservative English-language
"China Post" editorial noted that the prospect of any
renewed Beijing-Vatican talks deserves Taiwan's close
attention. End summary.
1. U.S. and Cross-Strait Relations
"KMT's Misjudgment of the Current Situation Brings Harm
to the Nation and Taiwan's People"
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation:
800,000] editorialized (4/6):
". Second comes the KMT's misinterpretation of the
United States' cross-Strait policy. On the surface,
the framework of Washington's current cross-Strait
policy is indeed [the bottom line] that `no use of
force [on Beijing's side] and no independence [on
Taiwan's side].' Regarding the move to prevent Beijing
from using force against Taiwan, the inclusion of the
Taiwan areas in the U.S.-Japan defense treaty has fully
indicated the United States' determination to prevent
China from taking any action rashly. As for the
attempt to prevent Taiwan from moving toward
independence, the United States is playing a more pro-
active card by using arms sales and diplomatic pressure
to force the rulers in Taiwan to yield. All these
developments made the KMT think that as long as it
makes great concessions with regard to cross-Strait
relations or the `one China' principle, it could look
after the U.S. interests and in the meantime meet
Washington's unspoken intentions. But in reality, this
is not the substance of U.S. cross-Strait policy at
all. In terms of Washington's short-term and long-term
strategic interests, the United States' attitude toward
Taiwan is to prevent it from moving toward independence
or unification. [The purpose of] preventing Taiwan
from moving toward independence is to secure regional
stability and peace at the current stage; Washington
does not want to be dragged into a war across the
Taiwan Strait, at least not now. Preventing Taiwan
from moving toward unification, on the other hand, is
due to the United States' long-term strategic
deployment and [the objective] to safeguard the United
States' defense at the West Pacific. Once Taiwan moves
toward unification [with China], the breach created in
the West Pacific might likely lead to the full collapse
of Washington and Tokyo's sea dominance in the West
Pacific. The KMT's chess move to `move westbound' is a
result of a gross error in interpreting the U.S.
policy. The comment by a U.S. official yesterday which
said the timing of P.K. Chiang's visit to China was
`inappropriate' has explained it all. ."
2. Pope John Paul II
"New Pope May Favor PRC Ties at Expense of Taipei"
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language
"China Post" [circulation: 30,000] said in an editorial
(4/6):
"Whoever succeeds the recently deceased Pope John Paul
II as the next leader of the Catholic Church is likely
to renew talks with Beijing to establish diplomatic
relations as one of his priorities. Should renewed
talks lead to an exchange of recognition between the
two sides, it would be a serious political blow to
Taiwan, as the Vatican is the island's sole diplomatic
ally in Europe. .
"The Holy See has essentially suspended its efforts
seeking better Beijing relations in the last two years
or so due largely to the poor health of the late Pope.
Now a new pontiff, likely to be elected by the College
of Cardinals within the next two weeks, may respond to
Beijing's recent call and resume talks.
"But it might not be that easy for the two governments
to resolve those basic differences unless they are able
to work out resolutions or are willing to make mutual
concessions. Still, the prospect of any renewed
Beijing-Vatican talks deserves close attention by
Taipei. It may even behoove it to carry out some
proactive diplomacy."
KEEGAN