Cablegate: Media Reaction Report - Israeli - Lebanese Conflict:
null
Lucia A Keegan 08/07/2006 03:25:38 PM From DB/Inbox: Lucia A Keegan
Cable
Text:
UNCLAS PARIS 05311
SIPDIS
cxparis:
ACTION: PAO
INFO: POL DCM ARS AMB
DISSEMINATION: PAOX
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: PRS: LPLATT
DRAFTED: PR: FTHOMAS
CLEARED: NONE
VZCZCFRI648
OO RUEHC RUEAIIA RUEATRS RHEFDIA RUEKJCS RHEHAAA
RUCPDOC RUEHRL RUEHRO RUEHMO RUEHNO RUEHVEN RHMFIUU
DE RUEHFR #5311/01 2191106
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 071106Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0147
INFO RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC//ASD/ISA//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 6260
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 7881
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 5526
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 3578
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 3120
RHMFIUU/COMSIXTHFLT
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 005311
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR INR/R/MR; IIP/RW; IIP/RNY; BBG/VOA; IIP/WEU;
AF/PA; EUR/WE /P/SP; D/C (MCCOO); EUR/PA; INR/P; INR/EUC;
PM; OSC ISA FOR ILN; NEA; WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE; DOC FOR
ITA/EUR/FR AND PASS USTR/PA; USINCEUR FOR PAO; NATO/PA; MOSCOW/PA;
ROME/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR FR
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION REPORT - Israeli - Lebanese Conflict:
Franco-American Diplomacy Iran
PARIS - Monday, August 07, 2006
(A) SUBJECTS COVERED IN TODAY'S REPORT:
Israeli - Lebanese Conflict: Franco-American Diplomacy
Iran
B) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE:
Today's lead international story revolves around the Franco-American
agreement at the UN on a resolution for the Israeli-Lebanese crisis.
While Sunday's Le Journal du Dimanche titled "Lebanon, Hope,
Finally" this morning's headlines are a little more tempered: "The
Franco-American Plan to the Test" says Le Figaro, while Liberation
headlines "False Start for Peace." Both dailies emphasize that the
draft resolution agreed to by Washington and Paris, "has been
rejected by three key players: Beirut, Damascus and Tehran." Le
Figaro interviews former Lebanese President Amine Gemayel who says
"neither Israel nor Hezbollah are ready for a resolution." Iran's
rejection of the plan is announced on the front page of Le Figaro
which carries an op-ed on Iran entitled "Iran: Frightening Without
the Bomb, And With It?" by Ceri researcher Therese Delpeche. (See
Part C) Essayist Guy Sorman pens an opinion piece in Le Figaro in
which he claims that Arab-Muslim hatred of Israel reveals a war
within itself. (See Part C) A petition signed by French university
professors asks in Le Figaro for "the immediate cessation of
Israel's massacre of Lebanese innocents."
For Liberation the draft resolution was "a laborious Franco-American
compromise." But in his editorial Gerard Dupuy does not see how this
compromise "can favor the second more functional compromise between
the belligerents." (See Part C) La Croix's article says the plan
"represents a victory for the French" and a "softening" of
Washington's line. Despite this agreement, La Croix warns, obtaining
broader consensus in the UNSC could prove difficult as some member
states reproach France and the U.S. for negotiating "in absolute
secret."
SIPDIS
Sunday's Le Journal du Dimanche interviews FM Douste-Blazy: "We and
the Americans were quite far apart at the start of the
negotiations... Today's agreement is a first very important step. We
now need to get the approval of the other UNSC members." About the
international force, he says: "Chirac was very clear. In the advent
of a ceasefire, we will look into our active participation in the
force..." The FM acknowledges that "as long as there is no
cease-fire, there is a permanent risk of a regional outbreak."
France Soir carries an interview with Michel Aoun, former Lebanese
head of government. According to Aoun, high civilian death tolls and
destroyed infrastructure indicate that Israel is targeting all of
Lebanon and not just Hezbollah. Aoun refers to Secretary of State's
plan for a "new Middle East": "In any case, it is not about
democracy... It could be that the Middle East of which Ms. Rice
speaks is a shift of regional countries' geographic borders."
In an interview in Le Parisien, UMP Deputy Claude Goasguen claims
Israel had no "premeditation" for a "counterattack to a veritable
act of war" by Hezbollah. Goasguen further regrets FM Douste-Blazy's
meeting with the FM of Iran, which is "overtly bellicose and
anti-Semitic." In another interview, UMP Deputy Etienne Pinte
describes the conflict as avoidable: "Two Israeli prisoners do not
merit a conflict." While Pinte concedes to Israel the right of self
defense, it cannot do this "to the detriment of populations."
(C) SUPPORTING TEXT/BLOCK QUOTES:
Israeli - Lebanese Conflict: Franco-American Diplomacy
"A Resolution Goes Unheeded..."
Gerard Dupuy in left-of-center liberation (08/07): "The
Franco-American draft resolution was a laborious Franco-American
compromise which has been rejected by Lebanon, and Hezbollah's
godparents, Iran and Syria... This was an honorable compromise
between the French and American positions. But how will this
compromise favor the second more functional and required compromise
between the belligerents? President Bush supports the resolution but
remains 'skeptical' about its implementation; the Israelis are
pleased... and the Arabs are furious: in short, everyone is playing
his assigned role... But why has France, which wants to position
itself as a third party in the equation, taken the risk of appearing
to favor a unilateral position? In undersigning a resolution that
will probably not be heeded, France's diplomacy gives a bizarre
image of the warden of peace it is trying to project... France holds
too few trump cards to waste even a single one."
"Time Is Short"
Dominique Quinio in Catholic La Croix (08/07): "The international
community was eagerly waiting for the U.S. to soften its position
and show less than total support for Israel. This is why everyone is
saluting the draft resolution reached at the UN after a compromise
between the French and the Americans. But like all compromises, the
Franco-American plan at the UN is unsatisfactory, even if it does
show a joint desire for involvement by both parties. But the text
calls not for a ceasefire but for a cessation of hostilities-which
allow defensive military actions-each side laying on the other the
responsibility for attacking first... Lebanese hostility to and
Iranian rejection of the agreement are already major obstacles to
obtaining any resolution. The small diplomatic step taken Saturday
is therefore not sure to succeed. Much negotiation will be needed.
And meanwhile, the battle rages on."
"Beyond Hezbollah, a War Within Islam,"
Guy Sorman in right-of-center Le Figaro (08/07): "Arab countries do
not accept the existence of Israel ... since its creation Muslim
nations have vowed to eliminate it ... and the only nation which
carries any weight is the U.S... Israel has for 60 years
crystallized the hatred of the Arab-Muslim world - anti-Zionism
being a sort of Arab aphrodisiac, according to the late Moroccan
King, is really 'disproportionate...' Economics alone doesn't
explain this conflict since Israel has no oil nor any natural
resources other than the value added by its population... It may be
that Israel is seen as the forward base of a democratic West in the
Islamic world... and that what is going on is a war between the Arab
moderates and the Arab fundamentalists. Recent free elections in
Iraq, Kuwait and Bahrain show that Arabs can free themselves and
their future - Allah willing."
Iran
"Iran Threatens the West"
Delphine Minoui in right-of-center Le Figaro (08/07): "Tehran has
rejected the latest UN resolution on the nuclear issue, with Iran's
negotiator calling the resolution 'illegal.' According to Iran's
chief negotiator, Ali Larijani, the West has 'killed' the
negotiations with its adoption of a text that goes 'against' the
nature of the talks. Iran's Parliamentary Foreign Relations
Commission spokesman says that the 'issue here is not trust; what is
at issue is that Americans wants to impose their plan on the Greater
Middle East...'"
"Iran Is Scary Enough Without the Bomb, But With It????"
Therese Delpeche of the CERI (Center for International Research) in
right-of-center Le Figaro (08/07): "The resolution adopted on July
31st shows once again that it is not Washington and European
capitals alone that demand that Iran suspend its nuclear program.
The only nation that voted against the resolution was Qatar...
Qatar's vote is an indication of how much the region fears Tehran:
Qatar has no sympathies for Iran. Neither did it vote in this manner
to protest against Israel's strikes against Lebanon... General
belief has it that the attack by Hezbollah was triggered by
Tehran... days before the G8... where Iran's nuclear issue was to be
discussed. It is reasonable to wonder about a diversion method by
the Iranians, who share ideological ties with Hezbollah... Those who
share this opinion in New York also fear that Iran could take other
unpleasant initiatives... While Doha's vote demonstrates to what
extent Tehran's attitude has the Middle East in a frenzy, we need to
draw the proper lessons. Iran has now been acknowledged as
possessing considerable nuisance power. And many fear that the
Iranian regime might take advantage of the situation, as
demonstrated by the stance of those who acknowledge that Iran
possesses a 'stabilizing' role. Another lesson that must be drawn is
that America's allies have more limited confidence in America's
ability to protect them. This is very serious because it can lead
certain nations to revise their nuclear defense policies... Reason
dictates a forceful response to Iran's threat... possibly before the
UNSC welcomes its new members next January: Venezuela, South Africa
and Indonesia. Diplomacy always acts as if time was on its side.
Considering the threats brought to light these past few weeks, one
would hope for a decision before January. But this outcome remains
illusory." STAPLETON