WikiLeaks

Scoop

Network

Cablegate: Thailand: Trafficking in Persons Report - 2010

Thursday, 25 February 2010, 6:09 am
Cable: Wikileaks
Ref: 10BANGKOK468

VZCZCXRO2679
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHJO RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH RUEHPB
RUEHPOD
DE RUEHBK #0468/01 0560609
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 250609Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0053
INFO RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJL/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 7704
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHXI/LABOR COLLECTIVE
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1720
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH 0294
RUEHMK/AMEMBASSY MANAMA 0374
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 1374
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1957
RUEHSV/AMEMBASSY SUVA 0530

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 44 BANGKOK 000468

Department for G/TIP (G-Laura Pena), EAP/RSP, INL, DRL, PRM
Labor for ILAB

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KTIP ELAB KCRM KWMN KMCA PGOV PHUM PREF SMIG KFRD
ASEC, TH
SUBJECT: Thailand: Trafficking in Persons Report - 2010

REF A: STATE 02094 (REPORTING REQUEST)
REF B: BANGKOK 432 (NGO BELIEVES PREVENTION IS KEY)
REF C: BANGKOK 366 (CHILD SOLDIERS)
REF D: 09 BANGKOK 3046 (THAI BEEF UP IMPLEMENTATION ON TIP)
REF E: 09 BANGKOK 3016 (CONVICTION IN ANOMA LABOR TIP CASE)
REF F: 09 BANGKOK 2821 (RESPONSE TO CRITICS: REGISTRATION)
REF G: 09 BANGKOK 1428 (THAI IMMIGRATION - LABOR ARRESTS)
REF H: 09 BANGKOK 853 (RTG ENGAGES ON TIP IN FISHING)
REF I: 09 BANGKOK 818 (UPDATE ON CASES OF THAI LABOR ABUSE)
REF J: 09 BANGKOK 499 (TIP REPORT INPUT CABLE - 2009)
REF K: 09 BAGKOK 237 (CHILD LABOR INPUT CABLE - 2009)
REF L: Thailand Desk-Embassy email - February 4, 2010

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

BANGKOK 00000468 001.2 OF 044

Sensitive But Unclassified. For Official Use Only.

1. (SBU) Summary: Thailand remains a source, transit, and
destination country for victims of human trafficking (TIP). In
particular, its relative prosperity compared to its neighbors
continues to make it a magnet for economic migrants, many of whom
are poor and undereducated, and therefore desperate for otherwise
undesirable work and vulnerable to exploitation. Faced with a
continuing trafficking problem, the Royal Thai Government (RTG) made
significant efforts to address it over the course of 2009 and made
progress in multiple areas towards meeting the minimum standards
under the TVPA. Along with other TIP-related criminal convictions,
Thai prosecutors successfully convicted offenders in the infamous
"Anoma" case, the first TIP conviction involving Thailand's
fisheries-related industries, to include shrimp processing.
Prosecutions are moving forward in other cases such as "Ranya Paew,"
scheduled for trial in May 2010. The Thai Prime Minister personally
participated in the RTG's broad TIP activities, including by
appearing in a television spot that aims to raise awareness on human
trafficking and chairing multiple meetings of the RTG's
highest-level anti-TIP committee. Other RTG prevention activities
included additional awareness raising media spots for the general
population, targeted trainings/workshops for high-risk groups, and
policy and programmatic efforts to keep all children (including
illegal migrants) in school. The Thai government enhanced its
international partnerships, signing a TIP-related agreement with the
Government of Burma in April 2009 and developed plans of actions
under other existing agreements, such as with Laos and Vietnam. The
RTG also opened three additional TIP shelters specifically for men,
who were recognized under Thai law as potential victims only as of
June 2008. Additional activities continue, including through the
RTG-organized working group on trafficking in the problematic
fishing sector. As with much of the RTG's anti-TIP work, the
working group is multidisciplinary in nature and includes leaders
from civil society. End Summary.

2. (SBU) Answers to questions provided in ref. A, paragraph 25
follow and should be read in conjunction with Post reports on the
Royal Thai Government's (RTG) anti-TIP efforts, Thailand's human
trafficking situation, and related matters (refs B - K):

I) THE COUNTRY'S TIP SITUATION:

-- A. WHAT IS (ARE) THE SOURCE(S) OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON HUMAN
TRAFFICKING? WHAT PLANS ARE IN PLACE (IF ANY) TO UNDERTAKE FURTHER
DOCUMENTATION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING? HOW RELIABLE ARE THESE
SOURCES?

Information on trafficking in persons is widely available from
various Thai government agencies (e.g., Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS), the
Anti-Human Trafficking Division (AHTD) of the Royal Thai Police,
Ministry of Labor (MOL), Office of the Attorney General (OAG),
Department of Special Investigation (DSI), etc) as well as from many
NGOs (i.e., the Labor Protection Network (LPN), New Life Center
(NLC), Mirror Foundation (MAF), Human Rights Development Foundation
(HRDF)) United Nations (UN) agencies, and other international
organizations active in Thailand. While most information collected
from these organizations is reliable, information from the media is
not always reliable and must be confirmed by other sources.

BANGKOK 00000468 002.2 OF 044

-- B. IS THE COUNTRY A COUNTRY OF ORIGIN, TRANSIT, AND/OR
DESTINATION FOR MEN, WOMEN, OR CHILDREN SUBJECTED TO CONDITIONS OF
COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, FORCED OR BONDED LABOR, OR OTHER
SLAVE-LIKE CONDITIONS? ARE CITIZENS OR RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTRY
SUBJECTED TO SUCH TRAFFICKING CONDITIONS WITHIN THE COUNTRY? IF SO,
DOES THIS INTERNAL TRAFFICKING OCCUR IN TERRITORY OUTSIDE OF THE
GOVERNMENT'S CONTROL (E.G. IN A CIVIL WAR SITUATION)? FROM WHERE
ARE PEOPLE RECRUITED OR FROM WHERE DO THEY MIGRATE PRIOR TO BEING
SUBJECTED TO THESE EXPLOITATIVE CONDITIONS? TO WHAT OTHER COUNTRIES
ARE PEOPLE TRAFFICKED AND FOR WHAT PURPOSES? PROVIDE, WHERE
POSSIBLE, NUMBERS OR ESTIMATES FOR EACH GROUP OF TRAFFICKING
VICTIMS. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN THE TIP SITUATION SINCE THE
LAST TIP REPORT (E.G. CHANGES IN DESTINATIONS)?

Thailand is a country of origin, transit and destination for persons
subjected to the worst forms of trafficking as defined by the
Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Trafficking occurs both
across international borders and internally between rural and urban
areas. Migrants from neighboring countries (mostly from Burma,
Cambodia, and Laos) are trafficked into Thailand. Thai citizens are
trafficked into other countries in Northeast Asia, the Middle East,
Africa, and Europe, and elsewhere including the United States.
Trafficking activity occurs in the area around the Thailand-Malaysia
border where political unrest hinders the RTG's ability to combat
all crime.

As a source country, in 2009, Thais were found to be trafficked,
mostly for the sex trade, agriculture work and construction work, to
Bahrain, Malaysia, the Maldives, Singapore, Japan, China, Oman,
South Africa, Timor Leste, the United States, Hong Kong, Brunei,
Taiwan, Vietnam, Germany and Spain. Thai men (along with men from
Burma and Cambodia) were found to be trafficked onto fishing boats
in international waters and rescued from countries such as Malaysia,
Indonesia, and Timor Leste. Most Thai trafficking victims were from
Thailand's northern, northeast and southern regions. They, like most
non-Thai trafficking victims within Thailand, were poor, and lacked
education and employment opportunities in their home communities. As
such, they were willing to take risks when promised better-paid jobs
elsewhere, sometimes using family-owned-land as collateral against
high labor broker/recruitment fees with the hope of being able to
pay off debt with income earned abroad. In September 2009, the Thai
government received several complaints from Thai farm workers in the
northeast who paid recruitment fees of 250,000 baht (7,575 USD) to
engage in agricultural work in Sweden and Poland. After paying the
broker fees, the workers were instead sent to work in slaughter
houses or construction sites, had their passports withheld, and
received less payment than originally promised.

The Foundation for Women reported in June 2009 that, according to a
survey conducted from February 2007 to February 2009, Thai women
trafficked for commercial sexual exploitation were mostly trafficked
to Bahrain (40 percent), Italy (19 percent), Japan (12 percent),
South Korea (9 percent), Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia,
Singapore, and Malaysia.

As a transit country, people from North Korea, China, Vietnam, and
Burma pass through Thailand to third countries such as Malaysia,
Indonesia, Singapore, Russia, Western Europe, South Korea, and the
United States.

As a destination country, people from neighboring countries
(Cambodia, Burma, Laos, China, and Vietnam) are found to be
trafficked into Thailand, mostly into urban areas such as Bangkok,
Chiang Mai, Pattaya, Samut Prakarn, Samut Sakhon, and Songkla. The
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) reported in October
2009 that 32 percent of Lao nationals trafficked to Thailand were
forced into prostitution while another 32 percent were used for
forced labor.

The Mirror Foundation (MAF), an NGO working to combat human
trafficking among street beggars and in the fishing industry,
reported that the number of human trafficking cases reported in

BANGKOK 00000468 003.2 OF 044

northeastern Thailand had risen with more than 80 cases reported
from May 2008 to June 2009. However, MAF viewed that the increase
in reports was likely due to growing awareness on TIP among RTG
officials, civil society representatives, and the general public. It
noted that increased reporting does not suggest a greater incidence
of human trafficking.

There was general agreement among UN agencies, NGOs, and the RTG
that only a small percentage of those engaged in prostitution in
Thailand are either underage or are in involuntary servitude or debt
bondage as defined by the TVPA, although problems remain.

Evidence suggested that the trafficking of men, women and children
into labor sectors such as commercial fisheries, fishing-related
industries, or domestic work was a significant portion of all
trafficking in Thailand. Children were also found to be trafficked
into Bangkok or other urban areas and forced to sell flowers, beg,
or work in domestic service, according to the NGO World Vision. Thai
women were found to be trafficked abroad for sexual exploitation
especially in Japan, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

Past studies by UN agencies and NGOs found evidence of exploitation
(including human trafficking) of Burmese migrants in the seafood
processing sector, sometimes through debt bondage. The United
Nations Inter-Agency Project on Human Trafficking (UNIAP) reported
that migrant workers were found to be vulnerable due to language
barriers and limited knowledge of Thai laws, as well as the
withholding of travel documents, migrant registration cards, and/or
work permits by employers.

According to past UNESCO and NGO studies, ethnic minorities resident
in Thailand, such as an estimated 350,000 northern hill tribe people
who have not received legal residency or citizenship, were at
particular risk for trafficking. Although absolute numbers of
ethnic minority trafficking victims were not high, they were found
in numbers disproportionate to their share of the population in
Thailand.

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
reported that government shelters received and provided assistance
to 609 TIP victims in 2009, 530 foreigners and 79 Thai citizens
(Note: most Thai citizens who received assistance from MSDHS chose
to stay in their own home instead of government shelters. End
Note).

Table 1: Number of Thai TIP victims in government shelters (Jan -
Dec 2009) (Unit: Number of Persons)

Countries Number of Persons
Trafficked to: Assisted
------------- -----------------
Bahrain 39
Japan 16
Malaysia 9
Other 15

Total 79
- --
(Source: Bureau of Anti-Trafficking in Women and Children,
Department of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS)
reported that 530 foreign women, children, and men were classified
as TIP victims in Thailand and received assistance and protection at
MSDHS shelters in 2009. Out of 530 foreign TIP victims, almost
three-fourths (398 victims) were victims of labor exploitation: 175
in factories, 170 in fisheries-related industries, and 53 as
domestic employees. Less than one-fourth (108 victims) were victims
of commercial sexual exploitation. The breakdown by country of
origin and by types of exploitation follows:

Table 2: Number of Foreign TIP victims in government shelters
(Jan-Dec 2009)

BANGKOK 00000468 004.2 OF 044

(Unit: Number of Persons)

Nationality Number of persons assisted
----------- -------------------------
Cambodia 57
Burma 260
Laos 195
Other 18

Total 530
---
(Source: Bureau of Anti-Trafficking in Women and Children,
Department of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

Table 3: Number of Foreign TIP victims assisted by MSDHS (Jan - Dec
2009)
(Unit: Number of Persons)

Types of exploitation Number of victims
-------------------- -----------------
Labor in factories 175
Labor in fisheries industry 170
Prostitution 108
Domestic Workers 53
Beggars 16
Others 8

Total 530
---
(Source: Bureau of Anti-Trafficking in Women and Children,
Department of Social Development and Welfare, MSDHS)

The Anti-Human Trafficking Division (AHTD), Royal Thai Police,
reported that AHTD alone (not including other police divisions)
investigated 134 cases of human trafficking. More than half of the
cases involved sexual exploitation and one-fourth of the cases
involved forced labor. Statistics by type of crime follow:

Table 4: Number of TIP investigations by the Anti-Human Trafficking
Division, Royal Thai Police (June 2008-November 2009)
(Unit: Number of cases)

Types of crime Number of cases
-------------- ---------------
Forced Prostitution 62
Other forms of sexual exploitation 15
Forced beggars 14
Enslavement 4
Forced labor 36
Blackmail 3

Total 134
---
(Source: Anti-Human Trafficking Division as of January 2010)

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Department of Consular Affairs
reported 309 Thai nationals were classified as TIP victims abroad
and repatriated to Thailand with MFA assistance in 2009 (January -
December 2009). The breakdown by destination country follows:

Table 5: Number of Thai TIP victims abroad who were repatriated back
to Thailand (Unit: Number of Persons)
Destination FY 2006 FY2007 FY 2008 CY 2009
(Oct08-Sep09) (Jan-Dec09)
---------- ------ ------- -------- -------
Bahrain 236 368 360 216
Singapore 9 14 3 9
Malaysia 39 12 73 36
South Africa 20 3 1 5
Saudi Arabia 0 3 0 0
Hong Kong 2 2 1 2
Japan 3 1 0 5
United Kingdom 5 0 0 0

BANGKOK 00000468 005.2 OF 044

Taiwan 0 0 5 1
Maldives 15
China 5
Oman 5
Timor 3
USA 3
Brunei 1
Vietnam 1
Germany 1

Total 397 403 443 309
---
(Source: Department of Consular Affairs, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs)

-- C. TO WHAT KIND OF CONDITIONS ARE THE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS
SUBJECTED?

Thai and foreign victims found themselves in situations of forced or
bonded labor, forced commercial sexual exploitation, domestic
servitude, or other exploitive conditions.

The sectors in which trafficked persons were most commonly found in
Thailand were (in no particular order) those involving sexual
exploitation, begging, domestic work, factory work, agriculture,
fishing, and fishing-related industries. The conditions that
victims were trafficked into varied from mild to severe. In some
cases, factory workers were forced to work long hours with few
safety precautions, experienced health problems, were vulnerable to
violence, and worked without pay or less pay than promised or
required by law. In fishing-related industries, workers at times
remained at sea for long periods (3 months to multiple years), did
not receive pay, and were threatened or physically beaten. In the
commercial sex industry, women were at times forced to work with
multiple clients.

-- D. VULNERABILITY TO TIP: ARE CERTAIN GROUPS OF PERSONS MORE AT
RISK OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING (E.G. WOMEN AND CHILDREN, BOYS VERSUS
GIRLS, CERTAIN ETHNIC GROUPS, REFUGEES, IDPS, ETC.)? IF SO, PLEASE
SPECIFY THE TYPE OF EXPLOITATION FOR WHICH THESE GROUPS ARE MOST AT
RISK

Migrants, ethnic minorities, and stateless people were more at risk
than Thai nationals. The majority of people trafficked to Thailand
were illegal migrants smuggled into Thailand from Burma, Laos, and
Cambodia who often had no valid visa or work permit, did not speak
Thai, had little knowledge of Thai law, or did not understand how to
access the Thai justice system, according to UNIAP. Newly arrived
migrants were generally more at risk. UNESCO identified lack of
citizenship as the greatest risk factor for highland girls and women
in Thailand to being trafficked or otherwise exploited. Regarding
Cambodian victims, many appeared to be males (especially those newly
arrived) trafficked onto fishing boats. Women trafficked were found
in sweatshops, the sex trade, and domestic service while children
were found in the agricultural sector and in small-scale shops.
Adult male victims were often found in the fishing (and related)
industries.

In November 2009, MSDHS published a list of thirty provinces that
are most at risk for human trafficking, including seven northern
provinces (Chiang Rai, Chiang Mai, Lam Pang, Utaradit, Pitsanulok,
Payao, Phrae), six northeastern provinces (Sa Kaew, Ubon Ratchatani,
Mukdaharn, Udontani, Kon Kaen, Nakorn Ratchasima), four central
provinces (Nakorn Sawan, Samut Sakhon, Samut Prakarn, Sukothai),
four eastern provinces (Prachin Buri, Rayong, Trad, Chantaburi), and
nine southern provinces (Ranong, Surathani, Phuket, Songkla, Yala,
Chumporn, Pattani, Nakorn Sidhammarat, Phang Nga).

In July, 2009, the Thai government began implementing an amnesty
program for illegal migrant workers in Thailand through which
employed migrants from Laos, Cambodia, and Burma could apply for
temporary work permits and must have their nationality verified by

BANGKOK 00000468 006.2 OF 044

their government. Those who fail to regularize their status through
participation in the program will be subject to deportation.
Observers in civil society and some of Bangkok's resident UN
agencies acknowledged the program as a positive step taken by the
RTG to protect migrants by bringing them into the formal labor
market, with related benefits such as access to health insurance.
Nonetheless, the Thai government's implementation of the program has
been met by criticism: poor communication to migrant communities,
under-regulation of private companies involved, high fees, and
unrealistic deadlines, among others. The RTG modified aspects of
the program to benefit migrants in response to media and NGO
criticism, but problems remain. Even critics agreed the Burmese
government, by its refusal to allow nationality verification within
Thailand, was to blame for the system that could lead to the
exploitation of migrants. Nonetheless, there were no known cases of
severe exploitation (including human trafficking) of participating
migrants.

-- E. TRAFFICKERS AND THEIR METHODS: WHO ARE THE
TRAFFICKERS/EXPLOITERS? ARE THEY INDEPENDENT BUSINESS PEOPLE?
SMALL OR FAMILY-BASED CRIME GROUPS? LARGE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZED
CRIME SYNDICATES? WHAT METHODS ARE USED TO GAIN DIRECT ACCESS TO
VICTIMS? FOR EXAMPLE, ARE THE TRAFFICKERS RECRUITING VICTIMS
THROUGH LUCRATIVE JOB OFFERS? ARE VICTIMS SOLD BY THEIR FAMILIES,
OR APPROACHED BY FRIENDS OF FRIENDS? ARE VICTIMS "SELF- PRESENTING"
(APPROACHING THE EXPLOITER WITHOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF A RECRUITER OR
TRANSPORTER)? IF RECRUITMENT OR TRANSPORTATION IS INVOLVED, WHAT
METHODS ARE USED TO RECRUIT OR TRANSPORT VICTIMS (E.G., ARE FALSE
DOCUMENTS BEING USED)? ARE EMPLOYMENT, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM AGENCIES
OR MARRIAGE BROKERS INVOLVED WITH OR FRONTING FOR TRAFFICKERS OR
CRIME GROUPS TO TRAFFIC INDIVIDUALS?

Traffickers ranged from opportunistic individuals to small groups
that specialized in certain geographic areas, to more organized
networks. According to UNIAP, traffickers bringing victims into
Thailand generally did not need a high level of organization,
whereas those bringing victims from Thailand to foreign destinations
required more organized networks and financing. As a destination
country, Thailand's somewhat porous borders made undocumented entry
from Burma, Laos, and Cambodia relatively easy. Human smuggling and
the use of false documents were regularly reported in Thailand.

A study conducted by UNIAP in collaboration with an NGO on brokers
and agents in Samut Sakhon indicated that labor brokers were either
a family member, a friend, or a stranger. They acted as a legitimate
work-oriented service facilitator, or as an exploiter and/or a
trafficker. The study found that brokers were of both Thai and
Burmese origin and worked in small groups or networks, collaborating
with employers and at times with individual law enforcement
officials. Exploitation was found in cases of brokers charging
excessive transportation fees, charging high release fees for
workers who wanted to change their place of work, selling trafficked
victims to another broker/employer, or charging excessive fees for
workers for migrant registration and nationality verification
services. Brokers and employers could further increase their control
over workers by withholding their identity documents so that workers
could not change employers (thereby limiting their freedom of
movement) until workers are able to paid off all debts. Some
migrants pay fees before their journey to Thailand and some work to
pay off their recruitment and transportation fees after arriving in
Thailand and beginning to earn income.

According to MAF, which has conducted research of the deep-sea
fishing industry, male trafficking victims were fraudulently
recruited by strangers at transport stations (i.e., train stations
and bus stations) and parks upon arrival in Thailand. Promised
well-paying jobs, the victims were trafficked through labor brokers
into forced labor situations on fishing boats. Some recruiters lured
the victims to entertainment establishments (such as karaoke bars)
where they incurred debt, and then either volunteered or were forced
to work on fishing boats to pay it off. Most traffickers were
individual persons or small groups that specialized in one
geographic area or economic sector, and provided a single service

BANGKOK 00000468 007.2 OF 044

such as transportation, forged documents, recruitment, or
accommodation for victims. Traffickers sometimes worked together,
however there appeared to be no formal relationship or rigid
hierarchical pattern within these informal networks. Traffickers
were also reportedly involved in other illegal activities, such as
drugs or weapons trafficking.

Post is not aware of substantiated reports of the selling of victims
by family members in Thailand. However, MAF reported that there were
many cases of Cambodian parents sending their children to beg on the
street of Thailand, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation.

As a source country, AHTD reported that most Thai trafficking
victims were lured by traffickers who were friends, relatives or
employment agents and who promised legitimate work. Most Thai
victims trafficked abroad used air transport.

II) SETTING THE SCENE FOR THE GOVERNMENT'S ANTI-TIP EFFORTS:

-- A. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING IS A
PROBLEM IN THE COUNTRY? IF NOT, WHY NOT?

The Thai government acknowledges human trafficking as a serious
problem in Thailand and has made substantial efforts to address it.
The Thai government continues efforts to fully implement its
comprehensive 2008 anti-trafficking law. Thai Prime Minister
Abhisit monitored Thailand's human trafficking situation as the
chair of the RTG's Anti-Trafficking in Persons (ATP) committee. In
January 2010, Prime Minister Abhisit was filmed for a short
television spot that aims to raise awareness on human trafficking
and encourage Thais to help combat it by informing authorities when
they see the potential incidents. The spot is expected to air in the
first quarter of 2010.

Under the supervision of the RTG's Coordinating and Monitoring of
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Performance (CMP) committee, MSDHS
continued developing a 2011-2016 national-level policy and plan to
combat human trafficking. In January 2010, the RTG submitted the
draft plan for comment through four public hearings (with
participation by NGOs, academia, and international agencies) in four
locations: Khon Kaen, Chiang Mai, Hat Yai, and Bangkok. After
recommendations are integrated into the national policy and plan, it
will be submitted to the cabinet for approval, hopefully during the
third quarter of 2010, according to MSDHS.

Government agencies, including MSDHS, MOL, OAG, and DSI, made public
announcements that combating human trafficking is a priority area.
The Children and Women Protection Division (CWD) of the Royal Thai
Police (RTP), established in July 2005 as a specialized division for
investigating crimes involving children, juveniles, and women,
changed its name to the "Anti-Human Trafficking Division" (AHTD) in
September 2009 to reflect its shift in priority toward all human
trafficking crimes, including those against men.

Other RTG activities to combat human trafficking in 2009 included:

- Using FY 2010 budgetary funds, the Thai government implemented a
TIP awareness raising campaign, providing training workshops to
youth groups throughout Thailand. It also created a short
informational television spot to raise awareness on the problem of
human trafficking specifically in the fishing industry (the spot
aired on Thai television's channel five).

- MSDHS organized anti-TIP training sessions specifically for
"competent officials," as defined by the 2008 TIP law and relevant
subordinate regulations. Ministry officials noted training sessions
have taken and will take place from December 2009 to March 2010 and
expect at least 1,000 participants.

BANGKOK 00000468 008.2 OF 044

approximately 150 officials from governmental and non-governmental
organizations. Select MSDHS provincial-level offices also hosted
awareness raising events in cooperation with NGOs such as World
Vision.

- On June 12, the RTG partnered with the International Labor
Organization (ILO) to commemorate World Day against Child Labor
(WDACL). The related event organized in Bangkok was covered by
various television, print, and radio news outlets. In addition to
the Bangkok event, the RTG and ILO organized events in Tak and
Pattani on June 12 and 18, respectively. At the event in Tak,
attended by approximately 1,500 individuals, Thailand's Vice
Minister of Education Chaiwut Bannawat gave a speech regarding the
RTG's "education-for-all" policy, i.e., for all children including
those of non-Thai migrants and ethnic minority groups resident in
Thailand.

- The RTG set up a working group on human trafficking in the fishing
industry which met at least nine times, and as recently as January
2010. (Note: The working group is under the auspices of the
Coordinating and Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee
(CMP), chaired by a Deputy Prime Minister, and consists of
government and non-government officials (from both for-profit
companies and non-profit organizations including MAF and LPN). The
CMP reports to Thailand's Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee
(ATP), chaired by the Prime Minister. End Note.). The working group
developed recommendations on how to combat human trafficking in the
fishing sector. The recommendations (on areas such as improved
regulations of boats, possible changes to law and regulation, and
awareness raising activities) require the review of the two
committees.

- Regarding the implementation of article 37 of Thailand's
anti-human trafficking law that authorizes, in certain
circumstances, the provision allowing TIP victims to temporarily
work in Thailand (presumably outside shelters): MSDHS requested that
the Thai Council of State determine whether article 37 of the TIP
law supersedes provisions of other relevant laws (i.e., the
Immigration Act and Alien Employment Act), thereby allowing for
victims to receive work permits immediately. The Council of State
responded in December 2009 that article 37 conflicts with other Thai
laws, thereby requiring legal changes before the article 37
provisions can be fully implemented. MSDHS officials continue
developing work opportunities for TIP victims within Thai shelters
(such as handicraft making) so that victims can receive income while
they are housed in shelters. MSDHS officials continued seeking to
develop procedures to allow certain victims to work outside
shelters, noting that such decisions would likely be made on a case
by case basis and take into consideration possible threats to the
safety and security of the victim. In some instances, male TIP
victims were allowed to work outside of shelters at construction
sites during the day and return to the shelters at night (Note: it
is unclear whether these individuals held Thai work permits. End
Note.). There were other reported occasions in which local
officials allowed victims to work outside shelters on a case by case
basis.

- The RTG established a working group regarding fraudulent marriages
between Thai women and foreign nationals, due to its assessment that
the area represents an increased risk factor for human trafficking.
The working group developed guidelines for government officials who
counsel women who contact them (for instance, when applying for a
passport) when making arrangements to marry foreigners through
marriage services providers.

-- B. WHICH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE INVOLVED IN EFFORTS TO COMBAT
SEX AND LABOR TRAFFICKING - INCLUDING FORCED LABOR - AND, WHICH
AGENCY, IF ANY, HAS THE LEAD IN THESE EFFORTS?

Thailand's 2008 TIP law stipulated the establishment of an
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee (ATP) chaired by the Prime
Minister and a Coordinating and Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking in
Persons Committee (CMP) chaired by a Deputy Prime Minister. In 2009,

BANGKOK 00000468 009.2 OF 044

the ATP and CMP conducted three and six meetings respectively. The
ATP's priority in 2009 was the development of the 2011-2016 national
policy and plan to combat human trafficking; a policy and plan to
combat human trafficking in the fishing industry; and the
development of a human trafficking database. Activities supervised
by the CMP in 2009 included formal international cooperative efforts
on TIP (e.g., through the UN's Coordinated Mekong Ministerial
Initiative Against Trafficking (COMMIT) process and the development
of memoranda of understanding, such as with Burma); the development
of guidelines for law enforcement officers to improve coordination
on prosecutions; the development of a training curriculum for
"competent officials" under the TIP law; the development of
guidelines to help prevent fraudulent marriages between Thai women
and foreign nationals; and the creation of a working group focused
on the U.S. Department of State's TIP report.

The government agency responsible for coordinating the RTG's broad
anti-TIP work is the Ministry of Social Development and Human
Security (MSDHS). Specifically, MSDHS' National Operation Center on
Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking (NOCHT) is a focal
point to coordinate prevention and suppression of TIP with relevant
RTG agencies. This office, led by the Deputy Permanent Secretary of
MSDHS, is also assigned to be the secretariat of the two
national-level TIP committees (ATP and CMP). At the provincial
level, 75 Provincial Operation Centers on Prevention and Suppression
of Human Trafficking (POCHT) have been formed, reporting to a
central coordinating committee. MSDHS' Bureau of Anti-Trafficking
in Woman and Children (BATWC) is responsible for providing general
assistance, shelter, and protection to victims of human trafficking.
Office of Welfare Promotion, Protection and Empowerment of
Vulnerable Groups under the MSDHS is also responsible for training
for the multidisciplinary teams and "competent officials" under the
Anti-TIP Act as well as awareness raising campaigns nationwide to
prevent human trafficking.

Other RTG entities include the Ministry of Labor (MOL), the Ministry
of Tourism and Sports, the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MFA), the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of
Education, the Bureau of University Affairs, the Ministry of Public
Health, the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Agriculture and
Agricultural Cooperatives, the Office of the Attorney General, the
Royal Thai Police (RTP), the Department of Special Investigation
(DSI), the Office of the National Human Rights Commission, and the
Office of the Prime Minister. Different agencies take the lead on
different aspects of anti-TIP work, depending on the nature of the
activities involved. MSDHS takes the lead on victim protection and
prevention efforts. The MOL takes the lead on labor trafficking
prevention and the protection of worker's rights (through
inspections). According to a UN official, the Ministry of Education
conducted child-specific prevention activities by raising awareness
among children.

With regards to investigation and prosecution, the Anti-Human
Trafficking Division: AHTD (formerly known as Children and Women
Protection Division) of the Royal Thai Police (RTP) is the
specialized police division for investigating human trafficking
crimes. The revitalized AHTD is structured as six units consisting
of approximately four hundred police officials. Likewise, the
Immigration Police Office designated officers in each province to
work with the MOL's Department of Employment to identify potential
victims and to provide them assistance with the support from MSDHS.
The Transnational Crime Coordination Center (TCCC) was set up in the
Royal Thai Police to be a specialized unit responsible for
collecting and analyzing information, strategic planning, and
coordinating work on eleven types of transnational crimes (including
human trafficking).

The Department of Special Investigations (DSI) under the Ministry of
Justice designated four full-time officers to work specifically on
human trafficking. While DSI cannot investigate specific cases
without approval from the DSI board, the agency worked to develop a
database on trafficker networks with the goal of understanding human
trafficking. In 2009, DSI was reportedly involved in investigating

BANGKOK 00000468 010.2 OF 044

at least eight human trafficking-related cases.

UN and NGO staff working closely with the RTG commented that RTG
anti-TIP trainings since 2008 started to show significant impact in
2009 in terms of better coordination and understanding on human
trafficking among RTG officials. Other NGOs noted that much work
remains as this increased understanding is not found in most
frontline implementers, especially local police due to frequent
personnel rotations.

-- C. WHAT ARE THE LIMITATIONS ON THE GOVERNMENT'S ABILITY TO
ADDRESS THESE PROBLEMS IN PRACTICE? FOR EXAMPLE, IS FUNDING FOR
POLICE OR OTHER INSTITUTIONS INADEQUATE? IS OVERALL CORRUPTION A
PROBLEM? DOES THE GOVERNMENT LACK THE RESOURCES TO AID VICTIMS?

Thailand is a migration hub in Southeast Asia with a relatively
prosperous economy that attracts migrants from neighboring countries
who flee conditions of poverty and, in the case of Burma, political
and military repression as well. TIP-related transnational
organized crime has been facilitated by modern communications
technology and transportation links, allowing traffickers to take
advantage of income inequalities within Thailand and between
countries.

In Thailand, there were additional factors contributing to human
trafficking, including a lack of educational opportunities and
occupational training for migrants, demand for sexual services in
the tourism and entertainment sectors, and a strong supply of
migrant laborers. In some sectors, especially domestic services and
fishing or fisheries related industries, employers relied on migrant
workers (registered or otherwise) to fill jobs in which Thai
citizens have shown little interest.

Language barriers hampered the RTG's ability to work with non-Thai
TIP victims, whether to provide protection or facilitate
prosecution. In an effort to remedy the situation, the RTG (with
support from NGOs (such as World Vision) and international
organizations (such as the International Organization for Migration
(IOM) and UNIAP) developed a list of qualified interpreters to help
communicate with victims in government shelters and the RTG's
anti-TIP hotline.

Police operations were limited by poorly-centralized data collection
capabilities, limited funds, and a lack of continuity of
investigations due to frequent personnel rotations and turnover.
Similarly, prosecutors' offices were understaffed and lack
sufficient resources to effectively see cases through to conclusion.
The justice system remained slow in its handling of all criminal
cases, including TIP crimes. Resources for labor inspection, both
financial and human, within the Ministry of Labor were also limited.
Observers reported that cooperation between police and prosecutors
to effectively bring TIP (and other) cases to successful prosecution
is an area requiring continued improvement.

According to one (well-informed) NGO, the fact that most traffickers
are individuals or small groups only loosely working together and
who are often illegal migrants themselves makes law enforcement
efforts difficult. The NGO opined that local-level police have
difficulty tracing, or are not eager to trace, entire trafficking
networks since they often involve activity outside their
jurisdiction.

-- D. TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMATICALLY MONITOR ITS
ANTI-TRAFFICKING EFFORTS (ON ALL FRONTS -- PROSECUTION, VICTIM
PROTECTION, AND PREVENTION) AND PERIODICALLY MAKE AVAILABLE,
PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY AND DIRECTLY OR THROUGH REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS, ITS ASSESSMENTS OF THESE ANTI-TRAFFICKING EFFORTS?

According to section 16(5) of the 2008 Anti-Trafficking in Persons
Act, the ATP must direct and supervise the arrangement of study or
research projects and the development of an integrated database
system to benefit the prevention and suppression of trafficking in
persons. Section 40 of the Act stipulates that MSDHS shall prepare

BANGKOK 00000468 011.2 OF 044

an annual report regarding Thailand's TIP situation, including
guidelines for future activities.

In 2009, the RTG, led by the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee
(ATP) chaired by the Prime Minister, agreed upon a plan to develop a
comprehensive trafficking database including data from three key
areas: victim assistance, protection, and prosecution. A working
group tasked with developing the database and including
representatives from relevant agencies reported difficulties in
linking data from different government agencies (i.e., the existing
police database system does not include that of other agencies such
as MSDHS, the shelters of which maintain victim information in paper
form).

In 2009, the RTG hired an independent research team from Sukothai
Tammatirach University to conduct an evaluation of the RTG's
2005-2010 national policy and plan to combat human trafficking. In
addition, the RTG makes information on its anti-TIP activities
available through the COMMIT process through which senior officials
from six Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) countries meet to share
achievements and lessons-learned from anti-trafficking projects
implemented within their countries.

With regards to law enforcement, the Transnational Crime
Coordination Center (TCCC), was set up within the Royal Thai Police
as a specialized unit responsible for collecting and analyzing
information, strategic planning, and coordinating work on eleven
types of transnational crimes (including human trafficking).
However, TCCC remains reliant on other agencies in the Royal Thai
Police to collect information and populate its databases, thereby
creating an operational challenge. Nonetheless, observers noted
eagerness on the part of various police elements to collaborate in
this area.

-- E. WHAT MEASURES HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN TO ESTABLISH THE
IDENTITY OF LOCAL POPULATIONS, INCLUDING BIRTH REGISTRATION,
CITIZENSHIP, AND NATIONALITY?

For Thai citizens, the Civil Registration Act 1991 requires that
parents register birth notifications (Tor Ror 1/1) with
district-level administrative offices within 15-30 days of the date
of birth of a child. The district administration then issues a birth
certificate (Tor Ror 3) that includes a thirteen-digit personal
identification number.

For non-Thai citizens (both legally and illegally in Thailand),
parents can register birth notifications (Tor Ror 1/1) to certify
that the child is born in Thailand. Only the child of legal migrants
from three neighboring countries (Lao, Cambodia, Burma) who were
temporarily allowed to work in Thailand can receive a birth
certificate of non-Thai nationality, along with a thirteen-digit
personal identification number. The child's name is then added to
the list of residents in a home as part of a required home
registration.

A significant but indeterminate number of stateless persons resided
in Thailand. In accordance with Thai law, children born in Thailand
before 1992 to illegal immigrant parents who entered Thailand after
October 1985, are eligible to apply for Thai citizenship. The law
also empowers local officials to make determinations of these
citizenship claims instead of the Ministry of Interior as in the
past. This change significantly reduces processing time and the
complexity of the application process.

Specifically, the 2008 Nationality Act allows children who are born
in Thailand to stateless parents to apply for citizenship with proof
of birth place. However, because of poverty and restricted mobility
of highlanders, documentation and evidence of birth was usually
difficult to provide. In addition, those stateless persons who were
born in the country and who may be able to prove citizenship
eligibility often waived that privilege to classify themselves as
"migrants" and gain access to certain jobs unavailable to stateless
persons. In doing so, however, these individuals lost any basis for

BANGKOK 00000468 012.2 OF 044

citizenship eligibility that they previously held. The 2008 law
allows these individuals to reclaim their eligibility, i.e. to
develop their legal personal status, provided they relinquish
migrant worker status, i.e. give up their work permits.

With regard to refugees, parents inform camp committees of the birth
of a child after which district officers (or camp commanders if
authority is delegated to them) issue a birth notification (Tor Ror
1/1), certifying the birth of a child. While there is a law that
allows the Thai government to issue the birth certificate (Tor Ror
3), in practice, the Ministry of Interior is not yet be able to
issue the birth certificate for refugee children dut to technical
problems.

-- F. TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE GOVERNMENT CAPABLE OF GATHERING THE DATA
REQUIRED FOR AN IN-DEPTH ASSESSMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS?
WHERE ARE THE GAPS? ARE THERE ANY WAYS TO WORK AROUND THESE GAPS?

While making efforts to do so, the RTG's data on law enforcement
efforts is not fully integrated. Government shelters, the police,
and the Office of the Attorney General, as well as the Thai Courts
(a separate branch of government) use different applications to
collect data. An RTG team is working to develop an integrated
database combining the victim assistance database, prosecution
database, and the protection database (see answer to question
II(D)).

III) INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS:

FOR QUESTIONS A-D, POSTS SHOULD HIGHLIGHT IN PARTICULAR WHETHER OR
NOT THE COUNTRY HAS ENACTED ANY NEW LEGISLATION SINCE THE LAST TIP
REPORT.

-- A. EXISTING LAWS AGAINST TIP...PLEASE PROVIDE A FULL INVENTORY OF
TRAFFICKIGN LAWS, INCLUDING NON-CRIMINAL STATUTES THAT ALLOW FOR
CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ALLEGED TRAFFICKING CRIMES...

In 2009, the RTG approved various subordinate regulations to
Thailand's 2008 anti human trafficking law (Anti-TIP Act), all of
which improved the legal/regulatory framework to combat exploitative
labor, including of children. The regulations provide clear
guidelines and instructions for relevant officials in implementing
the 2008 human trafficking act. The regulations under the Anti-TIP
Act:

- establish rules regarding the protection and usage of documents or
information related to TIP offenses (November 2008),
- establish norms on the registration of non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and the assistance they provide during anti-TIP
Operations (March 2009),
- establish, and manage the operation of an Anti-Trafficking in
Persons Fund to finance anti-TIP programs (an older TIP fund could
be used for victim assistance but not other activities such as
awareness raising)(May 2009),
- govern the provision of temporary protection for trafficking
victims (October 2009),
- establish rules governing TIP victim assistance, repatriation, and
compensation (October 2009), and
- define "competent official" to determine which official has
authority to perform certain duties under the law (April 2009).

The Thai government's 2009-2014 National Plan of Action on
eliminating the worst forms of child labor (NPP) was approved by its
national committee on September 29, 2008 and by the Thai cabinet on
January 28, 2009. The National Plan of Action identifies "bad" forms
of child labor, which include: all forms of slavery, debt bondage,
forced or compulsory labor including forced or compulsory
recruitment of children for use in armed conflict, commercial sex
work, including participation in pornographic movies and still
photographs; and labor involving the sale or transport of illegal
drugs (in line with ILO Convention 182). The NPP addresses five
strategic goals, including 1) the prevention of the worst forms of
child labor (WFCL) 2) the protection and withdrawal of children from

BANGKOK 00000468 013.2 OF 044

the WFCL 3) effective law enforcement and improvement of relevant
legislation 4) knowledge development and capacity building 5) the
development of an administrative system.

Thailand's full complement of laws regarding TIP follows:

Prevention and Suppression of Trafficking Act (2008)
--------------------------------------------- ------
-- This comprehensive anti-trafficking law replaced the 1997
Prevention and Suppression of Woman and Children Trafficking Law.
The new law allows for men to be classified as TIP victims (and
entitled to relevant legal protections) as well as women and
children, and covers both internal and external (transnational)
forms of TIP.

-- The forms of trafficking covered by the law extend to slavery,
forced begging, forced labor and trade in organs, in addition to
those categories previously covered by the 1997 law such as sexual
exploitation, pornography production and distribution, and other
forms of sexual exploitation.

-- Other elements of the law include the imposition of heavier
penalties for all offenders involved in human trafficking; the
ability of victims to claim compensation from the offender for any
damages caused by human trafficking; measures to protect victims and
witnesses during court trials against traffickers; the provision of
shelter and other necessities for TIP victims, including physical,
psycho-social, legal, educational, and health care assistance; and
protection for victims and their immediate families within and
outside the country to ensure their security and well being.

Criminal Code (1956)
---------------------
-- Defines punishment for a person who procures, lures, detains,
traffics, distributes, or transports a man or woman for an indecent
sexual purpose, with or without his or her consent. It also defines
punishment for a pimp, a trafficker for labor exploitation, and
human smuggler.

Immigration Act (1979)
----------------------
--Provides that foreigners who do not enter Thailand through an
immigration checkpoint with a valid passport and visa (in cases in
which a visa is required) or other legal documents are considered
illegal immigrants. Personnel at immigration checkpoints can
prohibit any person from entering Thailand if it is suspected that
he/she is involved in prostitution, the trading of women, children,
drug smuggling, or other types of smuggling.

Prevention and Suppression of Prostitution Act (1996)
--------------------------------------------- -------
-- Prohibits all forms of prostitution and provides specific
penalties for cases involving children under the age of 18. Fines
and terms of imprisonment under the Act are based on the age of the
child involved, with more severe terms established for prostitution
involving younger children. Penalties are imposed for those
involved in child prostitution including customers, procurers,
brothel owners, and those who force children into prostitution,
including parents.

Criminal Code Amendment (no.14) (1997)
------------------------------------
-- Imposes strong penalties on persons who sexually exploit women
and children (both boys and girls) under 18 years-old. It also
penalizes violators who sell children to be beggars or to
establishments which employ labor in a "cruel or hazardous fashion."
It defines punishments for pimping, trafficking for labor
exploitation, and human smuggling. The law, however, does not cover
adult males.

Labor Protection Act (1998)
---------------------------
-- Protects child employees (under 18 years old) against the worst

BANGKOK 00000468 014.2 OF 044

forms of child labor by imposing penalties on those hire children
under 15 years old and those who employed children between 15-18
years old in hazardous work or without appropriate rest periods. In
addition, the law also imposes penalties on employers of child labor
who fail to notify labor inspectors regarding their employment of
young workers.

Money Laundering Control Act (1999)
-----------------------------------
-- Provides for the seizure of assets of persons who exploit
children in the (illegal) commercial sex and narcotics industries.
The Act also defines "predicate offense" to include any activities
relating to (i) procuring, seducing or transporting for an indecent
act a woman or child for sexual gratification of others; (ii)
transporting a child and a minor; (iii) seducing or transporting
such persons for prostitution, an offense while acting as an owner,
supervisor or manager of a prostitution business or establishment or
being a controller of prostitutes in a prostitution establishment.

Criminal Procedure Amendment Act (No. 20) (1999)
--------------------------------------------- ---
-- Revises the Criminal Procedure Code to protect children from
traumatic stress resulting from interviews, inquiries and the court
trial process. In its revised form, the law requires that there be
a social worker, a psychologist, an attorney, or a person requested
by the child during investigation and trial. Further, videotape
recording shall be used to take the statement of the child victim or
witness in order to prevent the child from repeated traumatic
interviews. It also allows a child to give testimony before the
offender or his peers have a chance to contact the child or the
child's family for the purpose of bribery or intimidation.

The Compulsory Education Act (2002)
-----------------------------------
-- States that education is compulsory for nine years (from grade
one until grade nine or from seven years old to sixteen years old).
Parents who neglect to send their children to school shall be
subjected to a fine of 1,000 baht (USD 29).

Child Protection Act (2003)
---------------------------
-- Provides for the prohibition and elimination of exploitation of
children in slave-like or bonded conditions, illicit activities,
hazardous and arduous work, prostitution, pornography, or other
similar activities. The Act defines the "child" as a person below
18 years of age, and makes him/her eligible to receive child
protection and welfare assistance. This definition also applies to
children with no legal status in Thai territory. The Act mandates
the establishment of a National Child Protection Committee, along
with the Bangkok Metropolitan and other Provincial Protection
Committees, to recommend policies, plans, budgets, measures, to
issue regulations and appoint sub-committees or working groups, and
to promote the social welfare, safety, and protection of children.

The Witness Protection Act (2003)
---------------------------------
-- Provides support to child and adolescent victims who are to be a
witness or an informant in a trafficking or organized crime case.

Criminal Code Amendment (no. 19) (2007)
--------------------------------------
-- Extends the coverage of sexual exploitation to both boys and
girls.

The Protection of Victims of Violence in the Family Act (2007)
----------------------------------------
-- States that any member of a family, especially children and
women, are protected against all forms of abuse and exploitation.

The Promotion of Child and Youth Development Act (2007)
--------------------------------------------
--Promotes programs and activities for children and youth to empower
and prevent them from becoming victims of all forms of

BANGKOK 00000468 015.2 OF 044

exploitation.

The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (2007)
--------------------------------------------- -----
-- Section 52 provides that children (as well as youth, women, and
members of families) shall have the right to be protected by the
State against violence and unfair treatment and shall also have the
right to receive rehabilitation in the event of such circumstances.

-- Section 84(7) of the Constitution states that the government
should pursue economic policies that protect child and female
laborers.

The Amendment of the Alien Employment Act (2008)
--------------------------------------------- ---
-- Systematizes workforce participation of migrant workers by
prohibiting an employer from hiring migrant workers who do not have
licenses to work with the employer. An employer who violates this
law shall be subject to a fine of 10,000-100,000 baht (285-2,857
USD) per migrant worker. The Act also states that migrants along
border areas who have travel documents under the Immigration Act
shall be allowed to temporarily work in the area around the border.
In addition, to ensure the safe repatriation of migrant workers, the
Act requires that an employer must make deductions from a migrant
worker's salary to contribute to a repatriation fund. The Act also
calls for an Alien Employment Committee to be set up in order to
develop policies regarding alien employment and monitor the
implementation progress of these policies.

-- B. PUNISHMENT OF SEX TRAFFICKING OFFENSES: WHAT ARE THE
PRESCRIBED AND IMPOSED PENALTIES FOR THE TRAFFICKING OF PERSONS FOR
COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, INCLUDING FOR THE FORCED
PROSTITUTION OF ADULTS AND THE PROSTITUTION OF CHILDREN?

The Anti-TIP Act prescribes punishment for labor recruiters, labor
agents and employers if they commit TIP offenses in accordance with
three general elements of TIP, namely: actions, means, and purposes
as provided in Section 6 of the Act.

For a trafficker who is an individual person:
- If a trafficking offense is committed against an adult, penalties
are 4-10 years imprisonment and a fine of 80,000 to 200,000 baht
(2,285-5,714 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child between 15
to 18 years old, penalties are 6-12 years imprisonment and a fine of
120,000 to 240,000 baht (3,429-6,857 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child below 15
years old, penalties are 8-15 years imprisonment and a fine of
160,000 to 300,000 baht (4,571 - 8,571 USD).

For a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business
- a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business shall be
liable to a fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 baht (5,714-28,571 USD)
(NOTE: this provision is intended to be in addition to the penalty
on individuals above, not instead of it. End Note.)
- if an incorporated person/entity commits an offense due to an
order or act of a person (e.g., the entity's Director), or through
this person's negligence, the Director shall be subjected to
penalties between 6-12 years and fine of 120,000-240,000 baht
(3,429-6,857 USD).

Criminal Code Amendment no.14 (1997) makes a distinction between
"voluntary" victims and "involuntary" victims (a "voluntary" victim
is defined as someone who entered his/her situation voluntarily,
despite the illegal exploitation he/she may have endured).

If the victims are voluntary, the Criminal Code prescribes penalties
for human trafficking for sexual exploitation as follows:
-- if victims are over 18 years old, 1-10 years imprisonment and
fines of 2,000-20,000 Baht (57-571 USD);
-- if victims are between 15 and 18 years old, 3-15 years
imprisonment and fines of 6,000-30,000 Baht (171-857 USD);
-- if victims are under 15 years old, 5-20 years imprisonment and

BANGKOK 00000468 016.2 OF 044

fines of 10,000-40,000 Baht (286-1,143 USD).

If the victims are involuntary, the Criminal Code prescribes
penalties for trafficking people for sexual exploitation as
follows:
-- if victims are over 18 years old, 5-20 years imprisonment and
fines of 10,000-40,000 Baht (286-1,143 USD);
-- if victims are between 15 and 18 years old, 7-20 years
imprisonment and fines of 14,000-40,000 Baht (400-1,143 USD), or
life imprisonment
-- if victims are under 15 years old, 10-20 years imprisonment and
fines of 20,000-40,000 Baht (571-1,143 USD), or life imprisonment.

-- C. PUNISHMENT OF LABOR TRAFFICKING OFFENSES: WHAT ARE THE
PRESCRIBED AND IMPOSED PENALTIES FOR LABOR TRAFFICKING OFFENSES,
INCLUDING ALL FORMS OF FORCED LABOR? IF YOUR COUNTRY IS A SOURCE
COUNTRY FOR LABOR MIGRANTS, DO THE GOVERNMENT'S LAWS PROVIDE FOR
CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT -- I.E. JAIL TIME -- FOR LABOR RECRUITERS WHO
ENGAGE IN RECRUITMENT OF WORKERS USING KNOWINGLY FRAUDULENT OR
DECEPTIVE OFFERS WITH THE PURPOSE OF SUBJECTING WORKERS TO COMPELLED
SERVICE IN THE DESTINATION COUNTRY? IF YOUR COUNTRY IS A
DESTINATION FOR LABOR MIGRANTS (LEGAL/REGULAR OR ILLEGAL/IRREGULAR),
ARE THERE LAWS PUNISHING EMPLOYERS OR LABOR AGENTS WHO CONFISCATE
WORKERS' PASSPORTS OR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LABOR
TRAFFICKING, SWITCH CONTRACTS WITHOUT THE WORKER'S CONSENT AS A
MEANS TO KEEP THE WORKER IN A STATE OF COMPELLED SERVICE, OR
WITHHOLD PAYMENT OF SALARIES AS MEANS OF KEEPING THE WORKER IN A
STATE OF COMPELLED SERVICE?

Various Thai laws impose penalties for different aspects of labor
trafficking offenses:

Anti-Human Trafficking Act (2008)
---------------------------------
The Anti-TIP Act prescribes punishment for labor recruiters, labor
agents and employers if they commit TIP offenses in accordance with
three general elements of TIP, namely: actions, means, and purposes
as provided in Section 6 of the Act.

For a trafficker who is an individual person:
- If a trafficking offense is committed against an adult, penalties
are 4-10 years imprisonment and a fine of 80,000 to 200,000 baht
(2,286-5,714 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child between 15
to 18 years old, penalties are 6-12 years imprisonment and a fine of
120,000 to 240,000 baht (3,429-6,857 USD).
- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child below 15
years old, penalties are 8-15 years imprisonment and a fine of
160,000 to 300,000 baht (4,571 - 8,571 USD).

For a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business:
- a trafficker who/which is incorporated as a business shall be
liable to a fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 baht (5,714-28,571 USD)
(NOTE: this provision is intended to be in addition to the penalty
on individuals above, not instead of it. End Note.)
- if an incorporated person/entity commits an offense due to an
order or act of a person (e.g., the entity's Director), or through
this person's negligence, the Director shall be subjected to
penalties between 6-12 years and fine of 120,000-240,000 baht
(3,428-6,857 USD).

Labor Employment Act
--------------------
- If an individual lures a victim into work in Thailand (i.e.,
domestically, without crossing borders), the penalties are up to 3
years imprisonment or fines not exceeding 60,000 baht (1,714 USD) or
both.
-If an individual without a license lures a person to work abroad,
the penalties are 3-10 years imprisonment and fines of 60,000-
200,000 baht (1,714-5,714 USD).
- If an individual lures a person to work or to be trained abroad
through fraud, the penalties are 3-10 years imprisonment and fines
of 60,000-200,000 baht (1,714-5,714 USD).

BANGKOK 00000468 017.2 OF 044

Labor Protection Act
--------------------
- Employment of a child below the age of 15 carries a penalty of up
to 1 year imprisonment or fines up to 200,000 baht (USD 5,714) or
both.
- Failure to provide rest periods or forcing a child worker to
perform prohibited tasks results in a 6-month imprisonment or a fine
not exceeding 100,000 baht (USD 2,857) or both.
- Forcing a child to work during prohibited hours carries a penalty
of up to 1 year imprisonment or a fine of up to 200,000 baht (USD
5,714) or both.
- Forcing an adult to work more than 36 hours per week are subjected
to a penalty of not exceeding 6 months imprisonment or fines not
exceeding 100,000 baht (USD 2,857) or both.
- Forcing an adult to work continuously more than 5 hours per day
without at least 1 hour break shall be subjected to fines of not
exceeding 20,000 baht (571 USD).

The Criminal Code
-----------------
The Criminal Code prescribes criminal penalties for a person who
detains, confines, lures, procures, traffics, or forces an
individual into slave-like situations as follows:

-- Section 312:
- if a victim is an adult, an offender will be subjected to the
imprisonment not exceeding 7 years and fines not exceeding 14,000
baht (400 USD);

-- Section 312(2):
- if victims are under 15 years old, an offender will be subjected
to 3-10 years imprisonment and fines not exceeding 20,000 baht (571
USD);
-if victims are abused physically or mentally, an offender will be
subjected to 5-15 years imprisonment and fines not exceeding 30,000
baht (857 USD);
-if victims are seriously injured, an offender will be subjected to
lifetime imprisonment or between 7-20 years imprisonment;
-if victims die, an offender will be subject to the death penalty or
lifetime imprisonment or between 15-20 years imprisonment.

-- Section 312(3):
-A person who receives, distributes, procures, lures or transports a
person 15-18 years old, shall be subjected to imprisonment not
exceeding 5 years or fines not exceeding 10,000 baht (285 USD) or
both.
- A person who receives, distributes, procures, lures or transports
a person under 15 years old, shall be subjected to imprisonment not
exceeding 7 years or fines not exceeding 14,000 baht (400 USD)or
both.

-- D. WHAT ARE THE PRESCRIBED PENALTIES FOR RAPE OR FORCIBLE SEXUAL
ASSAULT? (NOTE: THIS IS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE A FOREIGN
GOVERNMENT'S COMPLIANCE WITH TVPA MINIMUM STANDARD 2, WHICH READS:
"FOR THE KNOWING COMMISSION OF ANY ACT OF SEX TRAFFICKING... THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE COUNTRY SHOULD PRESCRIBE PUNISHMENT COMMENSURATE
WITH THAT FOR GRAVE CRIMES, SUCH AS FORCIBLE SEXUAL ASSAULT (RAPE)."
END NOTE)

Since 2008, the RTG has imposed stronger penalties on those who
commit rape or forcible sexual assault through the amended criminal
code as follows:

Criminal Code Amendment (no.19) (2008)
--------------------------------------
-- Section 276:
-In the case of forced rape or forcible sexual exploitation, 4-20
years imprisonment or fines from 8,000-40,000 baht (229-1,143 USD).
If an offender uses a weapon or is involved in a group rape, 15-20
years imprisonment and fines between 30,000-40,000 baht (857-1,143
USD), or life imprisonment.

BANGKOK 00000468 018.2 OF 044

-- Section 277:
In the case of sexual exploitation:
-If the victims are under 13 years old, penalties are 7-20 years
imprisonment, and fines between 14,000-40,000 Baht (400-1,143 USD)
or life imprisonment.
-If the victims are under 15 years old, penalties are 4-20 years
imprisonment, and fines from 8,000-40,000 Baht (228-1,143 USD).
-If an offender uses a weapon or is involved in a group rape, life
imprisonment.

--If an offender who commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and
causes a victim to be seriously injured, the offender shall be
subjected to 15-20 years imprisonment and fines from 30,000-40,000
baht (857-1,143 USD) or life imprisonment.

--If an offender commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and
causes a victim to die, the offender shall be subjected to the death
penalty or life imprisonment.

--If an offender commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and uses
a weapon or is involved in a group rape that causes a victim to be
seriously injured, the offender shall be subjected to the death
penalty or life imprisonment.

--If an offender commits a crime under section 276 and 277 and uses
a weapon or is involved in a group rape that causes a victim to die,
the offender shall be subjected to the death penalty.

Prevention and Suppression of Prostitution Act (1996)
---------------------------------------------
If a person detains, confines, threatens, forces, tortures or rapes
others into prostitution, the penalties are 10-20 years imprisonment
and fines of 200,000-400,000 baht (5,714-11,429 USD). The law also
provides for offenders to receive a life sentence if responsible for
serious injury to prostitutes and the death penalty if prostitutes
are killed. The law also punishes those who assist an offender who
harms a prostitute.

-- E. LAW ENFORCEMENT STATISTICS: DID THE GOVERNMENT TAKE LEGAL
ACTION AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING OFFENDERS DURING THE REPORTING
PERIOD? IF SO, PROVIDE NUMBERS OF INVESTIGATIONS, PROSECUTIONS,
CONVICTIONS, AND SENTENCES IMPOSED, INCLUDING DETAILS ON PLEA
BARGAINS AND FINES, IF RELEVANT AND AVAILABLE. PLEASE NOTE THE
NUMBER OF CONVICTED TRAFFICKING OFFENDERS WHO RECEIVED SUSPENDED
SENTENCES AND THE NUMBER WHO RECEIVED ONLY A FINE AS PUNISHMENT.
PLEASE INDICATE WHICH LAWS WERE USED TO INVESTIGATE, PROSECUTE,
CONVICT, AND SENTENCE TRAFFICKERS. ALSO, IF POSSIBLE, PLEASE
DISAGGREGATE NUMBERS OF CASES BY TYPE OF TIP (LABOR VS. COMMERCIAL
SEXUAL EXPLOITATION) AND VICTIMS (CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE VS.
ADULTS). WHAT WERE THE ACTUAL PUNISHMENTS IMPOSED ON CONVICTED
TRAFFICKING OFFENDERS? ARE THEY SERVING THE TIME SENTENCED? IF NOT,
WHY NOT?

The RTG does not yet have an integrated database system that
includes information from the police, prosecutors, and courts.
While government shelters under MSDHS maintain victim case records,
they monitor the progress of prosecution efforts through the
criminal court level but not through the appeals process to higher
courts. As such, comprehensive data on law enforcement efforts is
not readily available. Nonetheless, in 2009 the RTG's
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee (ATP) agreed upon a plan to
develop a comprehensive trafficking database (see details in II(D)).
The RTG did provide data on law enforcement efforts as follows:

Table 4: Number of TIP investigations by the Anti-Human Trafficking
Division, Royal Thai Police (June 2008-November 2009)
(Unit: number of cases)

BANGKOK 00000468 019.2 OF 044

Types of crime Number of cases
-------------- ---------------
Forced Prostitution 62
Other forms of sexual exploitation 15
Forced beggars 14
Enslavement 4
Forced labor 36
Blackmail 3

Total 134
---
(Source: Anti-Human Trafficking Division as of January 2010)

Number of TIP prosecutions by the OAG (FY 2008-FY 2010)
(Unit: case)
Fiscal year Received Initiate Prosecution Declined
----------- -------- -------------------- --------
2008 28 18 10

2009 19 17 2

2010 8 8 0
- - -
(Source: Office of Attorney General (OAG))

Examples of TIP cases investigated and prosecuted (both open and
complete) in 2009, as well as details of other TIP-related cases
with new information during 2009, follow (note: case titles are
Post's own and not used officially by the RTG. Cases are not listed
in any particular order.):

Anoma
-----
In March 2008, the Anoma shrimp factory in Samut Sakhon was raided
by Thai police, with 73 workers classified by Thai authorities as
trafficking victims (38 adults and 35 children under age 17). The
Thai police inspector's office of the city district of Samut Sakhon
completed the investigation into the Anoma factory case and filed it
with the Office of Attorney General of Samut Sakhon on August 19,
2008. The Police filed civil and criminal charges against two Thai
citizens in the case: the owner of the Anoma factory and her brother
the factory manager. The Office of the Attorney General submitted
the case on September 10, 2008, to the responsible criminal court.
On November 26, 2009 the court convicted and sentenced the two
offenders; one offender to five years in prison and a 1 million baht
fine, and the second offender to eight years in prison and a 2
million baht fine. The defendants were convicted under relevant
sections of Thailand's Immigration Act and Measures in Prevention
and Suppression of Trafficking in Women and Children Act, Criminal
Code, Alien Employment Act, Immigration Act, and Labor Protection
Act. The conviction was significant as it was the first human
trafficking conviction involving Thailand's fisheries-related
industries, which includes shrimp processing.

Payao
-----
On July 30 2008, a task force composed of police, social welfare
officers, and an NGO official rescued 10 girls and women from the
"Ice Karaoke" bar in Payao province. The team identified 6 victims
of trafficking among them, from ages 11 to 18. The two individuals
arrested were charged with human trafficking, procurement for the
purpose of prostitution and harboring of illegal immigrants. One of
the arrestees, the owner of the establishment, has since died from
disease. Criminal proceedings continue against the other with
witness testimony taken in February 2010. Prosecutors are also

BANGKOK 00000468 020.2 OF 044

seeking damages in the amount of 100,000 baht (2,857 USD) per
victim.

Ranya Paew
----------
On September 14, 2006, police raided the "Ranya Paew" shrimp
processing factory in Samut Sakhon after being tipped off by local
labor activists. Police identified 66 victims of trafficking in the
factory. Victims (mostly Burmese) lived in squalid conditions where
they were forced to work, beaten, and unable to leave. The police
interviewed 66 victims and other witnesses between December 2006 and
March 2008 before filing with prosecutors. In July 2008, they filed
criminal charges against three factory owners for (1) detaining or
confining workers (2) putting workers into slavery situations, (3)
receiving, distributing, procuring, or luring workers, and (4)
conspiring with more than 2 people to commit crimes against women
and children. The trial is set to begin in a Bangkok criminal court
on May 18, 2010.

Pancake
-------
In October 2009, a NGO received a report that a 17 year-old Burmese
boy from Mae Sot, Tak had been kidnapped and forced to work in a
rotee pancake shop in Fang, Chiang Mai. The boy had escaped after
being forced to sell pancakes without pay and often physically
assaulted by his employer. The NGO informed law enforcement
authorities of the case through the multi-disciplinary team of
government and non-governmental officials in Chiang Mai, after which
police issued a warrant for the arrest of the business owner on
charges of kidnapping, taking a minor away from a parent, forced
labor, and human trafficking. The boy is being cared for in a
shelter.

Flower Girl
-----------
The Children and Women Protection Division (CWD) arrested a Burmese
woman on July 14, 2008 on charges of child exploitation and human
trafficking. A second individual, a man, was arrested in the
following weeks. The victim, a 16 year-old Burmese girl, was forced
to sell flowers at night in Bangkok since age 10. The victim
reported being beaten if she did not earn enough money. Post
received an unconfirmed report that a criminal court convicted the
two offenders for physical abuse of a child and providing shelter to
an illegal migrant (we will follow septel should new information
become available).

Trang: November 23
------------------
On November 23, officers from DSI, Immigration police, local police,
MSDHS, and the Ministry of Labor, along with representatives from
NGOs LPN and MAF jointly rescued 51 Burmese workers from a locked
room at a port in Kantang district, Trang province, presumably to be
used as laborers on fishing vessels. 15 individuals were identified
as human trafficking victims and 26 were identified as potential
trafficking victims, all of whom were taken to government shelters
in Songkla and Ranong. The police reportedly arrested one (Burmese)
man at the time of the rescue who was guarding a door behind which
the victims were found. Police later arrested a local port operator
for providing shelter to illegal immigrants. In January 2010, a
court sentenced the guard to 2 years imprisonment for human
trafficking (he did not contest the charges, thereby receiving this
reduced sentence). The port operator was fined 40,000 baht for
providing shelter to illegal migrants. Local police are reportedly
continuing the investigation to facilitate the arrest of additional
individuals, including the three Burmese brokers who brought the
victims from Burma to Thailand.

Trang: April 22
---------------
On April 22, 2009, the Department of Special Investigations (DSI),
Immigration police, and officials from the Trang Provincial MSDHS
office rescued two ethnic Rohingya victims of trafficking who were
brought to a RTG shelter in Songkla Province. Law enforcement

BANGKOK 00000468 021.2 OF 044

questioned 10 Burmese and one Thai in the raid, charging one of the
Burmese (a labor broker) for human trafficking under section 6(1) of
the Anti-Human Trafficking Act. Other Burmese were charged with
illegal entry. The owner of the house was charged with providing
shelter for illegal migrants under the Immigration Act and hiring
illegal migrants to work under the Alien Employment Act.

Laos Garland Factory
--------------------
On May 17, 2009 the Thai Immigration police raided a small
garland-making factory (located in a home) in Samut Sakhon, rescuing
nineteen Laotian girls and young women, ages 12-20, who the police
consider victims of human trafficking. The Immigration police
arrested the two factory owners, Mr. Kasem Pensuk and Mrs. Tawanrat
Sukprasertngam, on charges of human trafficking, child labor, and
receiving/sheltering illegal immigrants. The Immigration Police and
Ministry of Social Development and Human Securities (MSDHS)
officials became aware of the case through another Laotian girl who
had escaped the factory. All twenty victims (including the
escapee), after being cared for at a Thai government shelter, were
repatriated on September 24, 2009. Prosecutors have taken pre-trial
statements in the criminal case. In a civil settlement, the
employer agreed to pay a total of 642,308 baht to the workers.

Samaesan
--------
On October 11, DSI, Thai Police (Region 2), marine police,
provincial social workers from the Ministry of Social Development
and Human Security (MSDHS), and representatives from Thai NGOs
Mirror Foundation and LPN jointly rescued 18 Burmese laborers who
were forced to work in fishing boats in Samaesan, Sataheep, in
Chonburi province. The operation resulted in the arrest of three
offenders. Mr. Mongkun Boonchosri (44), and Ms. Tinchoey (47) were
charged with human trafficking, detaining and confining, forcing
children under 18 to work, forcing people into slave labor, and
providing shelter to illegal migrants. Ms. Tinchoey and Mr. Aabapha
(36) were also charged with attempting to bribe officers in an
effort to avoid arrest. All 18 victims were sent to MSDHS' Chonburi
Children and Family Home. In preliminary interviews with government
officials, the victims explained they were forced to work on the
vessel in order to pay off broker fees and, if the boat captain was
not satisfied with their work, the victims were beaten. They also
reported being locked in a room (on shore) against their will when
the boat was docked and to being forcibly taken on board again when
the boat departed. The AHTD police continue to investigate the
case.

Vietnamese
----------
In August 2009, Department of Special Investigation (DSI) officers
rescued eight Vietnamese women and girls (ranging in ages from
seventeen to twenty-one) from forced prostitution in a hotel in the
Betong district of the southern province of Yala. The raid took
place after Vietnamese officials informed Thai counterparts of what
they had learned of the case in Vietnam. The officers arrested one
woman for forced prostitution. The victims had been told that they
were going to work in restaurants in Singapore; instead, they were
brought to Thailand and forced to work as prostitutes. The victims
are receiving services in a Thai government shelter, reportedly
cooperating with the ongoing investigation by the AHTD.

Moo Baan Factory
----------------
On July 19, 2009, the Migrant Karen Labor Union (MKLU) received
information from a worker in a shrimp peeling factory in Samut
Sakhon regarding the forced labor of Burmese migrant workers who
worked for approximately USD 1.50 per week. The workers reportedly
were moved from off-site living quarters to the factory in a locked
container truck daily (approximately ten minute drive). According
the informant who had worked for six months at the factory, on July
15, 2009, he and thirteen other workers escaped the factory,
although ten of them were caught and brought back to the work place.
With this information from the NGO, Thai authorities raided the

BANGKOK 00000468 022.2 OF 044

factory on July 31, 2009 and rescued 52 Burmese migrant workers. The
employer, his wife, and three other individuals were arrested after
the raid. 15 female victims were taken to the Baan Kredtrakarn
shelter in Nonthaburi Province and 20 other female victims were
taken to a separate shelter. 13 male victims were taken to a
shelter in Pathom Thani province (reportedly, only one of the
thirteen male victims remained in the shelter, the others having
been repatriated back to Burma or having run away). According to a
police official and an NGO with knowledge of the case, prosecutors
are moving forward with the case against the factory owner and are
taking witness testimony. Ministry of Labor officials worked with
the victims on a civil case to seek compensation for unpaid wages.

Italy
-----
On May 29, 2009, a criminal court sentenced a Thai woman to 18 years
imprisonment for trafficking three women from Thailand's Si Sa Ket
to Italy, where they were forced to work as prostitutes. The court
also ordered the offender to pay the victims a total of 1.5 million
Thai baht in compensation. The victims, all adult women, were lured
to Europe with the promise of well-paid jobs as house maids. After
arriving in Milan via Vienna in February 2006, the women were forced
to work as prostitutes until Italian police rescued the women and
repatriated them back to Thailand in August 2006. The offender was
arrested in Si Sa Ket in July 2007 after she returned from Italy.

South Africa
------------
On June 30, 2009, a criminal court sentenced three women to seven
years and six months in prison for trafficking two women for the
purpose of sexual exploitation in South Africa in 2006. The victims
had paid the offenders 30,000 baht to bring them to what they
thought would be a job in a bar. When they arrived in South Africa,
the victims were forced to work as prostitutes. The victims escaped
and were assisted by the Thai Embassy. Law enforcement officers then
investigated and arrested the offenders.

Bahrain
-------
On October 8, 2009, a criminal court sentenced a thirty-year old
Thai male to seven years in prison for trafficking four women for
the purpose of prostitution in Bahrain. Each victim had paid the
offender 150,000 baht (USD 4,545) for what they thought were
waitressing jobs in a Thai restaurant in Bahrain. After they
arrived, the women were forced to work as prostitutes.

Supanburi
---------
On August 10, 2009, a criminal court sentenced a factory owner to
death for the June 2007 death of a Karen migrant worker who
attempted to flee a factory in Supanburi Province. The worker had
been subjected to forced labor and severe physical abuse; the
factory owner was charged with murder and with providing work and
shelter to illegal migrant workers. The case is currently under
appeal.

Waraporn
--------
In March 2008, officials from CWD raided a shrimp-processing
facility in Samut Sakhon province and identified 20 victims (out of
approximately 300 interviewed) as trafficking victims. A local NGO
called in to assist the victims with interpretation services
reported the raid and screening process were not conducted well,
raising concerns potential victims were not identified.
Nevertheless, the case is proceeding in the Thai court system with
pre-trial statements completed on July 14, 2009. Ministry of Labor
officials continue gathering information to support civil penalties.

Prapha Navee
------------
A fleet of six fishing vessels (called "Prapha Navee") returned to a

BANGKOK 00000468 023.2 OF 044

Thai port in July 2006, and reported 39 deaths among their
crewmembers of over 100. Survivors testified that the cause of
death was starvation and malnutrition due to the failure of the
fleet captains to provide food, and that the bodies of the 39
deceased were thrown overboard. In September 2008, a Labor Court
ordered 38 surviving crew members receive 3.8 million baht (108,571
USD) in back wages; the decision is under appeal. Meanwhile, new
police investigators reportedly took over the case as the original
criminal investigation stalled with arrest warrants issued only in
the nicknames of the fishing boat captains involved. To date, no
arrests have been made. Law enforcement officials have stated that
the disposal of corpses at sea is a significant problem for the
investigation, since Thai law requires presentation of a corpse or a
part of a corpse to sustain a homicide charge. They also noted
potential witnesses were uninterested in testifying.

-- F. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE ANY SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT AND IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS ON IDENTIFYING AND TREATING
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING? OR TRAINING ON INVESTIGATING AND
PROSECUTING HUMAN TRAFFICKING CRIMES? SPECIFY WHETHER NGOS,
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, AND/OR THE USG PROVIDE SPECIALIZED
TRAINING FOR HOST GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

In 2009, the RTG revised and redistributed guidelines (in Thai) on
trafficking victim identification. The guidelines had been developed
in 2008, for use by police officers, immigration officers, social
workers and members of civil society to better identify potential
trafficking victims under Thailand's new TIP law. The guidelines, in
the form of a questionnaire to be used while interviewing a
potential victim during or after an anti-TIP operation, provide a
framework for interviewing officials to have a clearer understanding
of what defines a TIP victim. The guidelines state that a person
can be a victim of trafficking even if he/she originally
participated voluntarily in the activity in question and regardless
of one's immigration or worker registration status. They also
explain that debt bondage is considered a type of human trafficking,
and instruct that various types of supporting evidence should be
considered when identifying trafficking victims (i.e., evidence of
physical abuse or psychological trauma, etc).

MSDHS organized anti-TIP training sessions specifically for
"competent officials" (including social workers, police,
immigration, public health officer) as defined by the 2008 Anti-TIP
law and the relevant subordinate regulation. The training involves
an exam that officials must pass prior to being designated a
"competent officials." The Ministry expects at least 1,000
individuals will participate in the training sessions taking place
from December 2009 to March 2010.

In addition, the Thai Ministry of Labor in 2009, with support from
the ILO, conducted two training sessions in Thailand's upper North
and the Central region on the "Operational Guidelines for Labor
Trafficking," finalized in April 2008. Approximately 35 individuals
participated in each session. The guidelines were established to
improve coordination among members of multi-disciplinary teams,
consisting of both government and non-government officials, during
labor trafficking operations (i.e., rescue and protection).

The OAG conducted training sessions on Thailand's Anti-TIP for 600
public prosecutors from March 2008 to March 2009, and held a joint
seminar on human trafficking with counterparts from Laos. From July
20-24, the Asia Regional Trafficking in Persons Project (ARTIP)
partnered with the OAG on a training workshop for thirty public
prosecutors aimed at improving the prosecution of TIP crimes.

-- G. DOES THE GOVERNMENT COOPERATE WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTS IN THE
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKING CASES? IF POSSIBLE,
PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF COOPERATIVE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS ON
TRAFFICKING DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD.

The Thai government cooperated broadly with other governments on TIP
activities during the reporting period, including in the
investigation and prosecution of TIP crimes (see examples of

BANGKOK 00000468 024.2 OF 044

specific cases investigated and prosecuted in the answer to question
E above).

As an example of cross-border cooperation, under existing MOUs, the
RTG conducts regular meetings (at three levels) with the Lao and the
Burmese government. The first level "case conference" meetings
occur in the event of a new case of cross-border trafficking, or an
update on an old case. At the meetings, social workers from Lao or
Burma interview trafficked victims in order to obtain information
for tracing their families and to assist coordination with the RTG
on the victim's repatriation. The second level "case management
meetings" between senior officials from the RTG and Lao or Burmese
government are conducted at least every three months, with funding
from the IOM. Thailand, Laos, and Burma take turns hosting the
meetings that aim to solve implementation problems found through
case conferences. Should recommended policy changes or revised
procedures be identified through these meetings, the RTG takes them
up at memorandum of understanding (MOU) plan of action meetings
through the UN-organized "COMMIT process." Reportedly, the
government of Vietnam favors this model and is working with the RTG
to develop one.

Key and updated information on the Thai government' MOUs, bilateral
and multilateral, though which it cooperates on TIP issues follow
(from MSDHS and UN sources):

-- Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS): the MOU on the UN's COMMIT
process was signed on October 29, 2004. This joint declaration among
six Mekong sub-region countries affirms a political commitment to
eradicating all forms of TIP in the Greater Mekong sub region.
Member countries reviewed the achievements of the first Sub-regional
Plan of Action (SPA) in 2005-2007 and endorsed the Second SPA
2008-2010 focusing on seven areas: 1) Training and Capacity
Building, 2) National Plans of Action, 3) Multilateral and Bilateral
Partnerships, 4) Legal Frameworks, Law Enforcement, and Justice, 5)
Victim Identification, Protection, Recovery and
Reintegration, 6) Preventive Measures, and 7) Cooperation with the
Tourism Sector. In November 5-6 2008 COMMIT meetings, COMMIT
countries agreed to invite Malaysia to join the Initiative.

-- Cambodia: the MOU between Thailand and Cambodia on Bilateral
Cooperation for Eliminating Trafficking in Children and Women and
Assisting Victims of Trafficking, was signed on May 31, 2003. The
MOU covers cooperation in 3 areas: 1) return and reintegration, 2)
prosecution process guidelines and 3) information sharing.

-- Laos: the MOU between Thailand and Laos on Cooperation to Combat
Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, was signed on
July 31, 2005. On February 6-8, 2006, Laos and Thailand endorsed
the Bilateral Action Plan and Guidelines on Procedures of Victim
Return and Victim Rehabilitation, Especially Women and Children. A
Plan of Action (POA) phase II (2010-2012) was finalized in September
2009. Key aspects of POA phase II include the exchange of
information and knowledge on law enforcement and prosecution; the
development of twin border cities; and reintegration support.

-- Vietnam: the MOU between Thailand and Vietnam on Cooperation to
Combat Trafficking in Persons was signed on March 24, 2008. On March
19,
2009, governments of both nations agreed to a joint plan of action
that includes setting up a bilateral working group to combat human
trafficking, conducting an assessment of the bilateral human
trafficking situation and providing recommendations for preventive
measures, collaborating on the provision of protection and
repatriation of TIP victims, and expanding the sharing and exchange
of information on TIP in general. Teams from both countries are
drafting standard operating procedures to assist trafficking
victims, which are expected to be finalized in 2010.

BANGKOK 00000468 025.2 OF 044

collaboration. A related plan of action under the MOU was concluded
on August 6, 2009 and calls for:
(i) the establishment of a joint task force,
(ii) an assessment of the bilateral human trafficking situation (to
begin in the first quarter of 2010).
(iii) coordination of multidisciplinary training on victim
protection (MSDHS will host training sessions for officials from
Thailand and Burma in the first quarter of 2010; MSDHS is developing
a TIP training curriculum for interpreters who provide services in
TIP cases and plans to provide training in 2010.
(iv) improved reintegration mechanisms.

-- Malaysia: The RTG proposed in July 2007 that Thailand and
Malaysia sign a draft MOU on Cooperation to Combat Trafficking in
Persons. The Malaysian government returned a draft MOU to Thailand
for consideration in July 2009.

-- Australia: MSDHS and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) are
reportedly developing a draft MOU on cooperation on the repatriation
of trafficked victims and dissemination of information to the
public. The final draft was reviewed by both sides in December 2009
and it is expected to be signed in 2010. On July 4, 2008, the RTG
signed an MOU with the Asia Regional Trafficking in Persons Project
(ARTIP), funded by the Australian government, to support law
enforcement and capacity building on investigatory and prosecution
processes.

-- Japan: The RTG and the Japanese government are reportedly working
to set up a bilateral anti-human trafficking task force to develop a
formal MOU and standard operating procedures on victim protection
and reintegration.

-- H. DOES THE GOVERNMENT EXTRADITE PERSONS WHO ARE CHARGED WITH
TRAFFICKING IN OTHER COUNTRIES? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF
TRAFFICKERS EXTRADITED DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD, AND THE NUMBER
OF TRAFFICKING EXTRADITIONS PENDING. IN PARTICULAR, PLEASE REPORT ON
ANY PENDING OR CONCLUDED EXTRADITIONS OF TRAFFICKING OFFENDERS TO
THE UNITED STATES.

According to the Office of the Attorney General (OAG), Thailand did
not make any TIP-related extraditions in 2009. However, the RTG
granted the TIP-related extradition concerning an American citizen,
ordering his removal to the United States following his completion
of a sentence of imprisonment in Thailand for related conduct. The
RTG also deported multiple American citizens wanted in the United
States in child exploitation cases, including for child sex tourism.
The OAG also reported that it requested legal assistance on one
TIP-related case and received three mutual legal assistance requests
from other countries.

-- I. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN OR TOLERANCE OF
TRAFFICKING, ON A LOCAL OR INSTITUTIONAL LEVEL? IF SO, PLEASE
EXPLAIN IN DETAIL.

There were some reports (such as by Human Rights Watch) of local
officials involved in the abuse of migrants, including forced labor.
There was no information indicating that there was any tolerance
for trafficking at an institutional level.

-- J. IF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE INVOLVED IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING,
WHAT STEPS HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN TO END SUCH COMPLICITY? PLEASE
INDICATE THE NUMBER OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INVESTIGATED AND
PROSECUTED FOR INVOLVEMENT IN TRAFFICKING OR TRAFFICKING-RELATED
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD. HAVE ANY BEEN
CONVICTED? WHAT SENTENCE(S) WAS IMPOSED? PLEASE SPECIFY IF
OFFICIALS RECEIVED SUSPENDED SENTENCES, OR WERE GIVEN A FINE, FIRED,
OR REASSIGNED TO ANOTHER POSITION WITHIN THE GOVERNMENT AS
PUNISHMENT. PLEASE INDICATE THE NUMBER OF CONVICTED OFFICIALS THAT
RECEIVED SUSPENDED SENTENCES OR RECEIVED ONLY A FINE AS PUNISHMENT.

According to section 12 of the 2008 Anti-TIP law, government
officials who are involved in or commit crimes under the Act shall
be subjected to double the punishment stipulated for such offense.

BANGKOK 00000468 026.2 OF 044

Post was not aware of government officials investigated or
prosecuted for involvement in trafficking or trafficking-related
corruption during the reporting period.

-- K. FOR COUNTRIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TROOPS TO INTERNATIONAL
PEACEKEEPING EFFORTS...

Per Ref. A, paragraph 29, not applicable.

-- L. IF THE COUNTRY HAS AN IDENTIFIED PROBLEM OF CHILD SEX TOURISTS
COMING TO THE COUNTRY, WHAT ARE THE COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN FOR SEX
TOURISTS? HOW MANY FOREIGN PEDOPHILES DID THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTE
OR DEPORT/EXTRADITE TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN? IF YOUR HOST
COUNTRY'S NATIONALS ARE PERPETRATORS OF CHILD SEX TOURISM, DO THE
COUNTRY'S CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE LAWS HAVE EXTRATERRITORIAL COVERAGE
(SIMILAR TO THE U.S. PROTECT ACT) TO ALLOW THE PROSECUTION OF
SUSPECTED SEX TOURISTS FOR CRIMES COMMITTED ABROAD? IF SO, HOW MANY
OF THE COUNTRY'S NATIONALS WERE PROSECUTED AND/OR CONVICTED DURING
THE REPORTING PERIOD UNDER THE EXTRATERRITORIAL PROVISION(S) FOR
TRAVELING TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO ENGAGE IN CHILD SEX TOURISM?

According to Embassy-based law enforcement officers, the countries
of origin for sex tourists are Germany, the United Kingdom, the
U.S.A., Canada, Australia, and to a lesser extent, Japan.

IV) PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS:

-- A. WHAT KIND OF PROTECTION IS THE GOVERNMENT ABLE UNDER EXISTING
LAW TO PROVIDE FOR VICTIMS AND WITNESSES? DOES IT PROVIDE THESE
PROTECTIONS IN PRACTICE?

Under the Law
------------------
According to the 2008 Anti-TIP law, MSDHS shall provide assistance
as appropriate to a trafficked person, including food, shelter,
medical treatment, physical and mental rehabilitation, education,
training, legal aid, return to the country of origin or domicile,
and legal assistance with the processing of compensation.
Trafficking victims have the right to receive information regarding
the timeframe of the delivery of assistance, and their consultation
regarding the delivery of assistance is to be sought.

The Act also stipulates that officials shall provide for the safety
and protection of trafficking victims under their care, as well as
that of the victims' family members (if also trafficked).
Trafficking victims who cooperate with the prosecution of their case
as witnesses shall be protected under the law and will be allowed to
temporarily remain in Thailand and work while their case proceeds.

The Act states that for Thai nationals trafficked abroad who want to
return to Thailand or their country of residence, the RTG shall
assist without delay, and consider the victims safety and welfare.
For trafficking victims abroad who are not Thai, but reside, are
domiciled, and/or have been granted temporary status to remain in
Thailand under Thai law, the RTG shall assist their return to
Thailand should the victim desire.

Section 41 of the Act stipulates that unless the Minister of Justice
grants permission in writing, trafficking victims cannot be
prosecuted for entering, leaving, or residing in Thailand illegally,
for giving false information to government officials, for forging or
using a forged travel document, for prostitution, or for working

BANGKOK 00000468 027.2 OF 044

illegally. Government officials, in providing assistance, may place
the trafficked person in the care of a government or private welfare
center.

In Practice
-----------
MSDHS operated 76 temporary shelters located in every province to
provide temporary shelter for victims during the first 24 hours
after their rescue or receipt of assistance by the State (or 7 days
with court permission). After 24 hours, victims are transferred to
9 main centers (five for women and children, and four for men). The
RTG established all four shelters for men (in Chiang Rai,
Pathumtani, Ranong, and Songkla) since the June 2008 anti-TIP Act
came into force (i.e., in general, during the reporting period).
The RTG partners with NGOs in the rescue, protection,
rehabilitation, and repatriation of TIP victims. Victims were
engaged in income generating activities within government shelters
in which they resided (e.g., handicraft making by female victims)
but generally not outside government shelters.

The RTG made continued efforts to fully implement article 37 of
Thailand's TIP law, which authorizes, in certain circumstances, TIP
victims to temporarily work in Thailand (presumably outside
shelters). In some instances, male TIP victims were allowed to work
outside of shelters at construction sites during the day and return
to the shelters at night (Note: it is unclear whether these
individuals held Thai work permits. End Note.). There were other
reported occasions in which local officials allowed victims to work
outside shelters on a case by case basis. MSDHS also requested that
the Thai Council of State determine whether article 37 of the TIP
law supersedes provisions of other relevant laws (i.e., the
Immigration Act and Alien Employment Act), thereby allowing for
victims to receive work permits immediately. The Council of State
responded in December 2009 that article 37 conflicts with other Thai
laws, thereby requiring legal changes before the article 37
provisions can be fully implemented.

Thai embassies provided consular protection to Thai citizens who
faced difficulties overseas. In 2009, the MFA received a budget of
6 million baht (USD 176,470) for TIP prevention and victim
assistance activities and assisted in the repatriation of 309
victims to Thailand.

-- B. DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE VICTIM CARE FACILITIES (SHELTERS OR
DROP-IN CENTERS) WHICH ARE ACCESSIBLE TO TRAFFICKING VICTIMS? DO
FOREIGN VICTIMS HAVE THE SAME ACCESS TO CARE AS DOMESTIC TRAFFICKING
VICTIMS? WHERE ARE CHILD VICTIMS PLACED (E.G., IN SHELTERS, FOSTER
CARE, OR JUVENILE JUSTICE DETENTION CENTERS)? DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE
SPECIALIZED CARE FOR ADULTS IN ADDITION TO CHILDREN? DOES THE
COUNTRY HAVE SPECIALIZED CARE FOR MALE VICTIMS AS WELL AS FEMALE?
DOES THE COUNTRY HAVE SPECIALIZED FACILITIES DEDICATED TO HELPING
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING? ARE THESE FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE
GOVERNMENT OR BY NGOS? WHAT IS THE FUNDING SOURCE OF THESE
FACILITIES? PLEASE ESTIMATE THE AMOUNT THE GOVERNMENT SPENT (IN
U.S. DOLLAR EQUIVALENT) ON THESE SPECIALIZED FACILITIES DEDICATED TO
HELPING TRAFFICKING VICTIMS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD.

During 2009, the RTG, through MSDHS, operated 76 temporary shelters
in every Thai province and nine main shelters (five for adult women
and children, and four for adult males and their families) that
provide assistance to both Thai and foreign TIP victims. Through
the shelters, MSDHS's Bureau of Anti-Trafficking in Women and
Children (BATWC) provides equal support to TIP victims regardless of
their country of origin, responding to both their physical and
psychological needs.

MSDHS reported that government shelters received and provided
assistance to 609 TIP victims in 2009, 530 foreigners and 79 Thai
citizens (note: most Thai citizens who received assistance from the
MSDHS chose to reside in their own home instead of a government
shelter). Out of the 530 foreign TIP victims, almost three-fourths
(398 victims) were victims of labor exploitation in factories (175
victims), 170 worked in fisheries-related industries and 53 worked

BANGKOK 00000468 028.2 OF 044

as domestic employees. Less than one-fourth (108 victims) were
victims of commercial sexual exploitation.

Rehabilitation services provided to male and female trafficking
victims differed slightly. Life-skills training for female victims
focused on making handicrafts, sewing, and computer training.
Life-skills training for male victims focused on farming, mushroom
gardening, and hairdressing.

-- C. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS WITH ACCESS
TO LEGAL, MEDICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES? IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFY
THE KIND OF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE
FUNDING OR OTHER FORMS OF SUPPORT TO FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC NGOS AND/OR
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR PROVIDING THESE SERVICES TO
TRAFFICKING VICTIMS? PLEASE EXPLAIN AND PROVIDE ANY FUNDING AMOUNTS
IN U.S. DOLLAR EQUIVALENT. IF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED WAS IN-KIND,
PLEASE SPECIFY EXACT ASSISTANCE. PLEASE SPECIFY IF FUNDING FOR
ASSISTANCE COMES FROM A FEDERAL BUDGET OR FROM REGIONAL OR LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS.

Government shelters provide several types of support to trafficking
victims as follows:
-- food and accommodations;
-- medical care;
-- counseling services;
-- psychological assistance programs;
-- education (e.g. computer training, English courses);
-- vocational training (e.g. sewing and knitting, dressmaking,
weaving, arts and crafts, cooking, painting, farming, hairdressing,
etc.);
-- recreational services and social activities (e.g. library,
entertainment room, music class, sport classes, religious
activities, sightseeing);
-- early childcare;
-- life-skills education (e.g. risk management and problem solving
techniques);
-- reintegration and family assistance programs to help prepare
victims before repatriation and reintegration with their families
during and after their stay in the shelter.

There is limited direct funding provided by the RTG to foreign or
domestic NGOs for services to victims. However, the government
provides in-kind assistance in the form of technical support,
personnel, and facilities to NGOs active in anti-trafficking
activities. For example, a joint NGO-government trafficking task
force in Chiang Mai is located in the provincial hall. Government
office space and stipends for volunteers are also provided to the
National Council for Child and Youth Development, a
non-governmental
umbrella organization that includes anti-trafficking activities in
its mandate.

Despite the services provided to TIP victims, there were regular
reports over the rating period of individual foreign TIP victims who
chose to flee shelters, likely to attempt to return to families or
to seek outside employment, and not await completion of formal - an
often lengthy - repatriation procedures.

-- D. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ASSIST FOREIGN TRAFFICKING VICTIMS, FOR
EXAMPLE, BY PROVIDING TEMPORARY TO PERMANENT RESIDENCY STATUS, OR
OTHER RELIEF FROM DEPORTATION? IF SO, PLEASE EXPLAIN.

The RTG does not provide permanent residency status or other
permanent relief from deportation for trafficking victims. The RTG
does allow those classified as foreign TIP victims to receive
temporary (and often long-term) shelter and social services pending
repatriation to their country of origin. In 2009, shelter officials
reported they provided protection and social services for 530
foreign trafficking victims, including 57 from Cambodia, 260 from
Burma, 195 from Laos, and 18 from other nations. The RTG provides
the following assistance to foreigners trafficked into Thailand:

-- temporary protection and rehabilitation as well as vocational

BANGKOK 00000468 029.2 OF 044

training
-- collaboration with families, other governments, and NGOs for safe
repatriation
-- immunity from charges of crimes associated with the TIP victims'
status (i.e., illegal immigration, prostitution, etc.).

Furthermore, RTG officials cooperated with other governments, NGOs,
and international organizations to facilitate safe repatriation
processes and follow-up monitoring overseas.

A 2005 Cabinet Resolution established guidelines for the return of
stateless residents abroad who have been identified as TIP victims
and who can be proved to have had prior residency in Thailand. These
stateless residents can be given residency status in Thailand on a
case-by-case basis.

-- E. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE LONGER-TERM SHELTER OR HOUSING
BENEFITS TO VICTIMS OR OTHER RESOURCES TO AID THE VICTIMS IN
REBUILDING THEIR LIVES?

The RTG allows individuals classified as foreign TIP victims to
receive temporary (and often long-term) shelter and social services
pending repatriation to their country of origin. MSDHS reported
that government shelters received and provided assistance to 609 TIP
victims in 2009, 530 foreigners and 79 Thai citizens.

RTG policy is based on the belief that TIP victims, including
foreign, wish to return to their home community. As such, services
provided are on rehabilitation with the ultimate goal of
reintegration with home communities, including through
repatriation.

-- F. DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A REFERRAL PROCESS TO TRANSFER
VICTIMS DETAINED, ARRESTED OR PLACED IN PROTECTIVE CUSTODY BY LAW
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TO INSTITUTIONS THAT PROVIDE SHORT- OR
LONG-TERM CARE (EITHER GOVERNMENT OR NGO-RUN)?

Thailand has regional MOUs (between provinces within one region) on
cooperation to combat human trafficking. These MOUs provide
practical guidelines on the coordination of raid/rescue operations,
and protection and referral processes that involve relevant members

BANGKOK 00000468 030.2 OF 044

of government agencies and NGOs (working in what are referred to as
multidisciplinary teams). MOUs for the northeastern and eastern
regions were signed in 2006 and the MOUs for the northern and
southern regions were signed in 2007. MOUs covering the central
region were the last signed in 2008 (one covering the lower central
region signed in May and one covering the upper central region in
July).

The regional MOUs provide procedures to the Provincial Operation
Center on Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking (POCHT) in
each province. They generally state the POCHT shall coordinate with
members of their multidisciplinary teams (e.g., social workers,
health care officials, psychologists, etc.). Under these
procedures, trafficking victims are transferred to government or
NGO-run shelters as appropriate. If there is a reason to believe a
victim shall be endangered in a particular shelter, the chief of the
shelter or POCHT secretariat can request the police provide
protection under the 2003 Witness Protection Act.

According to an NGO that partners with the RTG on victim assistance,
training of RTG officials has improved coordination on TIP cases.
Other NGO observers believe that frontline implementers of
Thailand's TIP laws and policies require continued training to
improve coordination more.

-- G. WHAT IS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TRAFFICKING VICTIMS IDENTIFIED
DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? (IF AVAILABLE, PLEASE SPECIFY THE TYPE
OF EXPLOITATION OF THESE VICTIMS - E.G. "THE GOVERNMENT IDENTIFIED X
NUMBER OF TRAFFICKING VICTIMS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD, Y OR
WHICH WERE VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING FOR SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND Z OF
WHICH WERE VICTIMS OF NONCONSENSUAL LABOR EXPLOITATION.) OF THESE,
HOW MANY VICTIMS WERE REFERRED TO CARE FACILITIES FOR ASSISTANCE BY
LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? BY SOCIAL
SERVICES OFFICIALS? WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF VICTIMS ASSISTED BY
GOVERNMENT-FUNDED ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AND THOSE NOT FUNDED BY THE
GOVERNMENT DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD?

There is no official estimate available for the number of
trafficking victims identified during the reporting period.
Information provided by the RTG indicated that the vast majority of
identified TIP victims, including those receiving services in
government shelters, are non-Thai citizens.

AHTD reported that it alone (not including other police divisions)
investigated 134 cases of human trafficking. More than half of the
cases involved sexual exploitation and one-fourth of the cases
involved forced labor. The MFA Department of Consular Affairs
reported 309 Thai nationals were classified as TIP victims abroad
and repatriated to Thailand with MFA assistance in 2009 (see tables
in answers to questions 1-B).

-- H. DO THE GOVERNMENT'S LAW ENFORCEMENT, IMMIGRATION, AND SOCIAL
SERVICES PERSONNEL HAVE A FORMAL SYSTEM OF PROACTIVELY IDENTIFYING
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING AMONG HIGH-RISK PERSONS WITH WHOM THEY COME
IN CONTACT (E.G. FOREIGN PERSONS ARRESTED FOR PROSTITUTION OR
IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS)? FOR COUNTRIES WITH LEGALIZED PROSTITUTION,
DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A MECHANISM FOR SCREENING FOR TRAFFICKING
VICTIMS AMONG PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE LEGAL/REGULATED COMMERCIAL SEX
TRADE?

In 2008, the RTG developed "Guidelines on Trafficked Victim
Identification" for use by police officers, immigration officers,
social workers and members of civil society to better identify
potential trafficking victims under Thailand's new TIP law. The

BANGKOK 00000468 031.2 OF 044

guidelines, in the form of a questionnaire to be used while
interviewing a potential victim during or after an anti-TIP
operation, provide a framework for interviewing officials to have a
clearer understanding of what defines a TIP victim. The guidelines
state that a person can be a victim of trafficking even if he/she
originally participated voluntarily in the activity in question and
regardless of one's immigration or worker registration status. They
also explain that debt bondage is considered a type of human
trafficking, and instruct that various types of supporting evidence
should be considered when identifying trafficking victims (i.e.,
evidence of physical abuse or psychological trauma, etc).

In order to provide government officials with sufficient knowledge
to identify TIP victims, the Royal Thai Police and MSDHS
co-conducted numerous one-day trainings for police officers
(including immigration police) that focused on the Anti-TIP law and
victim identification process. MSDHS reported that approximately
2,500 police received training during 2009 (in addition to an equal
number in FY 2008).

According to Thailand's MOUs and guidelines regarding trafficking
cases, police collaborate with social workers, NGOs, and
interpreters when conducting a raid and screening for TIP victims.
The Coordination Center for the Protection of Children's Rights
Foundation Chiang Mai (TRAFCORD) informed us that the process of
identifying TIP victims among prostitutes sometimes takes two to
four weeks in order to gain the trust of victims. Police officials
and NGO representatives stated that overcoming language barriers is
often the most difficult challenge of identifying TIP victims.

-- I. ARE THE RIGHTS OF VICTIMS RESPECTED? ARE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS
DETAINED OR JAILED? IF SO, FOR HOW LONG? ARE VICTIMS FINED? ARE
VICTIMS PROSECUTED FOR VIOLATIONS OF OTHER LAWS?

The 2008 Anti-TIP Law provided numerous rights to trafficking
victims (see question C above), which are generally respected.
Trafficking victims have the right to receive services from the
State and information regarding the timeframe of assistance
delivery. Illegal migrants who are trafficking victims are
repatriated through established RTG processes in cooperation with
foreign governments and civil society. The anti-TIP law stipulates
that unless the Minister of Justice grants permission in writing,
trafficking victims cannot be prosecuted for entering, leaving, or
residing in Thailand illegally, for giving false information to
government officials, for forging or using a forged travel document,
for prostitution, or working illegally.

In practice, court proceedings in Thailand for all types of crime
are usually protracted, sometimes causing trafficking victims who
cooperate with prosecutions to remain in shelters for extended
periods of time. The RTG does, though, allow for victims who have
already given pre-trial testimony to be repatriated instead of
remaining in shelters. Another factor contributing to the lengthy
stays in shelters is the difficulty in verifying the nationality of
victims as part of the repatriation process, especially of those
without national identity cards or who are ethnic minorities from
Burma. Difficulties in tracing families (for children), and in
arranging documentation and reception by officials or NGO workers in
neighboring countries, resulted in lengthy stays. During this
period victims are protected at shelters, where they receive medical
treatment and food, counseling, and limited vocational and literacy
training.

-- J. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ENCOURAGE VICTIMS TO ASSIST IN THE
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKING? HOW MANY VICTIMS
ASSISTED IN THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS DURING
THE REPORTING PERIOD? MAY VICTIMS FILE CIVIL SUITS OR SEEK LEGAL
ACTION AGAINST TRAFFICKERS? DOES ANYONE IMPEDE VICTIM ACCESS TO
SUCH LEGAL REDRESS? IF A VICTIM IS A MATERIAL WITNESS IN A COURT
CASE AGAINST A FORMER EMPLOYER, IS THE VICTIM PERMITTED TO OBTAIN
OTHER EMPLOYMENT OR TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY PENDING TRIAL PROCEEDINGS?
ARE THERE MEANS BY WHICH A VICTIM MAY OBTAIN RESTITUTION?

BANGKOK 00000468 032.2 OF 044

The government generally encourages victims to participate in the
investigation and prosecution of trafficking. When victims opt not
to do so it is generally due to language barriers, illiteracy,
distrust of Thai officials, slow legal processes, and fear of
traffickers. Additionally, financial needs of victims who need to
earn income for their families also play a role in the low level of
victim participation in prosecutions. The Royal Thai Police
believes that fear of criminal networks, which often reach into
their home communities, played an important role in the reluctance
to pursue legal action. Officials at government shelters also
reported instances when traffickers try to intimidate or threaten
victims or their families.

To encourage assistance the investigation and prosecution of forced
labor cases, the 1998 Labor Protection Act allows for compensatory
damages from the employer. Department of Social Welfare officials
and NGOs use the threat of punitive sanctions under this law to
negotiate settlements with abusive employers using foreign
trafficking victims in sweatshops and in domestic work.

To create additional incentives for victims to assist with case
investigation and prosecution, the 2008 anti-TIP Law (Sections 34
and 35) requires victims be informed of their right to receive
compensation for damages and to the provision of legal aid from the
government. The public prosecutor must also help victims receive
compensation through the courts. Similarly, the law stipulates that
victims of TIP crimes are eligible to work while their case proceeds
through the courts. Also, the RTG allows for victims who have
already given testimony in TIP cases to be repatriated instead of
remaining in shelters.

The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) reported that in FY 2009,
it received 19 cases involving human trafficking crimes, 17 of which
the OAG initiated prosecutions and two of which the OAG declined to
prosecute. In FY 2010, it has initiated prosecutions in eight cases
received. While it is unclear how many victims are cooperating in
these cases, it is likely that many are since other cases prosecuted
by the OAG did receive victim cooperation. These include the Anoma
and Ranya Paew forced labor cases, one of which was successfully
prosecuted during the reporting year and one of which is still being
prosecuted (see above).

-- K. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE ANY SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN IDENTIFYING TRAFFICKING VICTIMS AND IN THE
PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO TRAFFICKED VICTIMS, INCLUDING THE SPECIAL
NEEDS OF TRAFFICKED CHILDREN? DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE TRAINING
ON PROTECTIONS AND ASSISTANCE TO ITS EMBASSIES AND CONSULATES IN
FOREIGN COUNTRIES THAT ARE DESTINATION OR TRANSIT COUNTRIES? WHAT
IS THE NUMBER OF TRAFFICKING VICTIMS ASSISTED BY THE HOST COUNTRY'S
EMBASSIES OR CONSULATES ABROAD DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? PLEASE
EXPLAIN THE TYPE OF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED (TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, REFERRALS
TO ASSISTANCE, PAYMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION HOME).

From June 15 to 19, 2009, the RTG hosted a counter-trafficking
training in Ayudhaya, Thailand at which representatives from the six
countries of the greater Mekong sub-region were trained on how to
strengthen efforts to combat trafficking.

In 2009, the MFA Department of Consular Affairs received a budget of
six million baht for TIP prevention and protection activities.
According to the MFA, it (along with Thai embassies and Consulates)
carried out the following anti-TIP activities:

-- Conducted awareness raising activities on the risk of being
trafficked. Activities, conducted in partnership with NGOs,

BANGKOK 00000468 033.2 OF 044

targeted risk-groups in eight of Thailand's northern provinces
(1,297 participants from June to September 2009) and among fishery
communities and risk groups at bus terminals in the northeast (187
participants).

-- Coordinated with the Hot Line Foundation to provide two rounds of
three-day trainings to 60 counselors for trafficking victims.

-- Conducted TIP awareness raising activities for Thai workers in
Chiang Rai prior to their travel to Middle East.

-- Organized TIP awareness raising activities for 434 Thai women in
Pattaya and 118 Thai workers in Chiang Mai.

-- Produced television and radio spots on TIP-related issues (i.e.,
"True Stories of Thai Women" on television channels 9 and 11, and
"Thais' Life Away from Home" on television channel 9).

-- Produced a "guide for living" pamphlet for Thai citizens
traveling to Malaysia, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong,
Kuwait, and Australia, and containing contact information for
emergency situations.

-- Produced posters to raise awareness on TIP-related fraud to be
posted in government buildings in every province, such as provincial
passport offices, provincial halls, provincial employment offices,
etc.

-- Supported a volunteer network and training seminar on labor law
and rights for 323 Thai workers in Taiwan.

-- Provided interpreters for 20 Thai TIP victims and funded support
for 30 to 40 Thai TIP victims in a shelter in South Africa.

-- Coordinated activities with Thai women support networks in
Norway, Sweden, Japan (Tokyo and Osaka), India, Malaysia, and
Dubai.

-- Organized a "Thai Friends help Thais" project to develop networks
of volunteers to assist TIP victims in Singapore.

-- Organized a seminar on TIP-related laws in Switzerland, Denmark,
and Germany.

-- Provided legal consultants for ten TIP victims in Taiwan.

BANGKOK 00000468 034.2 OF 044

Total 397 403 443 309
---
(Source: Department of Consular Affairs, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs)

-- L. DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE ASSISTANCE, SUCH AS MEDICAL AID,
SHELTER, OR FINANCIAL HELP, TO ITS NATIONALS WHO ARE REPATRIATED AS
VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING?

Victims of trafficking in Thailand as well as Thai nationals who are
trafficked abroad can claim financial compensation from the Royal
Thai Government. They may also receive additional compensation
should they participate in a prosecution as a witness. Medical aid
and shelter (other than temporary residence at one of six government
shelters) is not available for Thai nationals who are repatriated.
The RTG did provide broad prevention services as well as protection
services (i.e., interpretation and legal) as detailed in the answer
to question K above.

-- M. WHICH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OR NGOS, IF ANY, WORK WITH
TRAFFICKING VICTIMS? WHAT TYPE OF SERVICES DO THEY PROVIDE? WHAT
SORT OF COOPERATION DO THEY RECEIVE FROM LOCAL AUTHORITIES?

Numerous NGOs, both Thai and international, are active in working
with trafficking victims. They provide different levels of support,
varying from organizations that identify victims and work with
authorities to rescue them, to those who support them through the
judicial process and return from Thailand to their home countries.
Working-level cooperation with local authorities is generally good
and government funding was sometimes provided to NGOs. In-kind
assistance such as office space is often made available, as is the
case in models of cooperation created in Chiang Mai, Bangkok and
Chiang Rai. The RTG also provided office space to one NGO in the
Office of the Attorney General.

A partial list of NGOs active in Thailand and a brief description of
some of their key activities follows:

-- The Center for Protection of Children's Rights (CPCR) assists
abused, orphaned, neglected or trafficked children and counters
commercial sexual exploitation of children by legal and public
relations means. The NGO runs three rehabilitation homes for
children and young people rescued from trafficking, two are in
Bangkok, and one is in Chiang Rai. The Chiang Rai facility also
provides scholarships, vocational training and prevention programs
for young people at risk of entering the commercial sex industry or
at risk of being exploited for child labor.

-- Fight Against Child Exploitation (FACE) monitors cases of child
abuse and pursues prosecutions of pedophiles. FACE also provides
consultative services to Thai law enforcement entities on the
handling of trafficking victims.

-- Foundation for Child Development (FCD) provides emergency
assistance and support to victims of trafficking. It also runs
prevention campaigns and policy-level advocacy activities. FCD has
been a leading organization in providing assistance to victims in
the Ranya Paew case, and actively participates in policy level
discussions.

-- TRAFCORD: the Anti-Trafficking Coordination Unit based in Chiang
Mai, acts as a coordination center in Northern Thailand between
governmental and non-governmental agencies active in solving
problems of human trafficking. It was established in August, 2002,
largely with USG funding, and is a model of law enforcement and NGO
cooperation in initiating investigations, protecting victims, and
pursuing prosecutions of traffickers in the region.

-- The Labor Rights Promotion Network (LPN) is an NGO in the Samut
Sakhon province, on the Gulf of Thailand, in which seafood
processing and fisheries industries are based. LPN provides
counseling, vocational training and education programs for migrant

BANGKOK 00000468 035.2 OF 044

workers and their families, many of whom originate from Burma and
are vulnerable to exploitation or trafficking.

-- The Development and Education Program for Daughters and
Communities (DEPDC) in Mae Sai, near the border with Burma, works to
prevent at-risk children from being forced into the sex industry or
into other forms of child labor. DEPDC provides shelter, education,
vocational training, and employment opportunities to young girls at
risk. DEPDC also campaigns
against local interests that cater to child sex tourism.

-- The New Life Center (Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai) houses, feeds,
educates and provides vocational training to women from hill tribes
and other ethnic minorities who have been rescued from trafficking
or at risk of being trafficked.

-- The Buddha Kasetra School (Chiang Rai) is a shelter and school
for girls (both Thai and non-Thai) who cannot afford to continue
their education and are at risk of entering the sex industry.

-- The Foundation for Women (FFW) provides information, support,
referral and emergency financial assistance to women who are victims
of exploitation and violence. FFW also works with villagers in the
North and Northeast to oppose coerced prostitution and domestic
violence. FFW offers small-scale credit schemes for alternative
economic projects and conducts research on international migration
and trafficking, adolescent sexuality, and domestic violence.

-- The Mirror Art Foundation, through a project entitled, "The
Missing Person Center for Anti-Trafficking," provides counseling to
victims and their families and helps coordinate the activities of
government agencies, local authorities, and NGOs to assist victims.

-- The World Vision Foundation of Thailand (WVFT) concentrates its
activities on reducing the vulnerabilities of migrants through
prevention projects. It also has drop-in center at the border in the
Northeast and West to provide assistance and accommodate street
children and trafficked victims. World Vision in Burma also provides
assistance in family tracing and supporting reintegration process
for Burmese trafficked victim from Thailand.

-- Agir Pour Les Femmes En Situation Precaire or Alliance Anti
Traffic (AFESIP) programs include the building of community-based
networks and the provision of support to victims, including health,
legal, and family tracing services prior to reintegration or
repatriation.

-- Other international NGOs such as The American Center for
International Labor Solidarity (Solidarity Center), Save the
Children UK, GATTW, Oxfam, Prevent Human Trafficking, and ECPAT
International have ongoing substantive anti-trafficking programs in
Thailand.

-- International organizations actively working on anti-trafficking
programs in Thailand include UNESCO, UNIAP, UNICEF, the ILO, and
IOM.

V) PREVENTION:

-- A. DID THE GOVERNMENT CONDUCT ANTI-TRAFFICKING INFORMATION OR
EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD? IF SO, BRIEFLY
DESCRIBE THE CAMPAIGN(S), INCLUDING THEIR OBJECTIVES AND
EFFECTIVENESS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE REACHED BY SUCH
AWARENESS EFFORTS, IF AVAILABLE. DO THESE CAMPAIGNS TARGET
POTENTIAL TRAFFICKING VICTIMS AND/OR THE DEMAND FOR TRAFFICKING
(E.G. "CLIENTS" OF PROSTITUTES OR BENEFICIARIES OF FORCED LABOR)?
(NOTE: THIS CAN BE AN ESPECIALLY NOTEWORTHY EFFORT WHERE
PROSTITUTION IS LEGAL. END NOTE.)

During the reporting period, the RTG conducted numerous TIP
prevention activities. Some TIP prevention efforts included direct
involvement by Prime Minister Abhisit and members of his cabinet.

BANGKOK 00000468 036.2 OF 044

While some activities aimed to raise awareness on trafficking within
Thai society as a whole, others attempted to raise awareness among
targeted high-risk groups, including both Thai nationals and
non-Thais working in high-risk industries. While it is difficult to
determine how many individuals were reached in these efforts, NGOs
reported that awareness of human trafficking and labor rights has
grown within Thailand, both among high-risk populations (such as
Burmese migrants in the fisheries-centered city of Samut Sakhon) and
RTG officials. Examples of RTG TIP prevention efforts during the
reporting period follow:

- In January 2010, Prime Minister Abhisit was filmed for a short
television spot that aims to raise awareness on human trafficking
and encourage Thais to help combat it by informing authorities when
they see the potential incidents. The spot is expected to air in the
first quarter of 2010.

- On June 5, MSDHS organized activities to mark the one-year
anniversary of Thailand's comprehensive TIP law. Local media,
including the widely-read newspapers Thai Rath and Siam Rath,
covered the main awareness raising event in Bangkok, attended by
approximately 150 officials from governmental and non-governmental
organizations. Select MSDHS provincial-level offices also hosted
awareness raising events in cooperation with NGOs such as World
Vision.

According to the ILO, the Thai government continuously organized
activities aimed to prevent and eliminate child labor and forced
labor, including:

- a project on the prevention of the worst forms of child labor and
human trafficking in Samut Sakhon Province (March 2007 - December
2009),

- a project with the goal of integrating efforts to combat the worst
forms of child labor in Chiang Rai Province (April 2007 - December
2009),

- a project to address child migrants in Thailand and in the Mekong
Sub-Region (July 2007 - November 2009),

- a project aimed at the health promotion of child laborers in the
fishery and services sectors in Songkla and Pattani Provinces
(January 2008 - December 2009),

- a project aimed for integrated efforts to combat the inappropriate
use of child labor in Samut Sakhon Province (February 2008 -
February 2009),

- a project on promoting education for migrant children and children
of migrant labors to prevent child labor problems in Tak Province
(May 2008 - December 2009),

- a project on promoting quality of life in agricultural communities

BANGKOK 00000468 037.2 OF 044

and reducing child labor problems in the agricultural sector in Pob
Pra District, Tak Province (June 2008 - December 2009), and

- a project on solving the worst forms of child labor problems in
Chiang Rai Province (November 2008 - December 2009).

The ILO also reported the RTG made public education efforts (through
mobile units) to prevent exploitative child labor, targeting
employers, employees, child workers, students and the general public
in all provinces. The government also organized programs for
children prior to their entering the labor market, specifically
aimed at secondary school students and vocational students to help
prevent them from being lured into unlawful activities. The
Ministry of Labor maintained a similar Safety in School Project and
Village Labor Volunteer Programs to organize training for community
leaders and teachers on child labor problems.

As listed in section IV, question K, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
to prevent human trafficking in the reporting period:

-- Conducted awareness raising activities on the risk of being
trafficked. Activities, conducted in partnership with NGOs,
targeted risk-groups in eight of Thailand's northern provinces
(1,297 participants from June to September 2009) and among fishery
communities and risk groups at bus terminals in the northeast (187
participants).

-- Conducted TIP awareness raising activities for Thai workers in
Chiang Rai prior to their travel to the Middle East.

-- Organized TIP awareness raising activities for 434 Thai women in
Pattaya and 118 Thai workers in Chiang Mai.

-- Produced television and radio spots on TIP-related issues (i.e.,
"True Stories of Thai Women" on television channels 9 and 11, and
"Thais' Life Away from Home" on television channel 9).

-- Supported a volunteer network and training seminar on labor law
and rights for 323 Thai workers in Taiwan.

-- Coordinated activities with Thai women support networks in
Norway, Sweden, Japan (Tokyo and Osaka), India, Malaysia, and
Dubai.

-- Organized a "Thai Friends help Thais" project to develop networks
of volunteers to assist TIP victims in Singapore.

-- Organized a seminar on TIP-related laws in Switzerland, Denmark,
and Germany.

-- B. DOES THE GOVERNMENT MONITOR IMMIGRATION AND EMIGRATION
PATTERNS FOR EVIDENCE OF TRAFFICKING?

Thailand's topography and resource constraints make it impossible to
adequately monitor its borders. Although border security is a
national priority, the rugged terrain of much of the 2,900 miles of
land border greatly complicates efforts to control entry and exit.
An additional 1,600 miles of coastline provides further obstacles to
border control. Widespread smuggling of timber, oil, drugs and
people all occur. The government is sensitive to trends in labor
influxes. Cross-border labor movements, particularly from Burma,
are considered a national security issue. As a result of training
programs conducted during the reporting period, there was an

BANGKOK 00000468 038.2 OF 044

increasing understanding among police and immigration officers of
the difference between trafficking cases and voluntary migration
(both legal and illegal.) Frequent rotation among police and
immigration officers requires continual training efforts.
UNIAP-sponsored research that found mis-identification of
trafficking victims among deportees from Thailand highlighted this
fact.

Sensitive to Thailand's international image, immigration police
officers monitor outgoing passengers at Bangkok's international
airport for Thai female sex workers. Departure clearance is often
denied in suspect cases. For both illegal labor migrants and sex
workers, the participants are usually voluntary during this point in
the trafficking continuum. Various forms of force, fraud and
coercion are generally encountered only when victims reach the
destination country.

-- C. IS THERE A MECHANISM FOR COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATION
BETWEEN VARIOUS AGENCIES, INTERNAL, INTERNATIONAL, AND MULTILATERAL
ON TRAFFICKING-RELATED MATTERS, SUCH AS A MULTI-AGENCY WORKING GROUP
OR A TASK FORCE?

Collaboration between government officials and NGOs has
progressively improved in Thailand as reflected in the Thai
governments multiple MOUs on human trafficking with other
governments (both bilateral and multilateral), Thailand's multiple
provincial-level MOUs between its different domestic regions, and
the RTG's continued efforts to improve implementation of them (see
details in questions above). The RTG and provincial-level
governments increasingly enjoy close collaborative relationships
with civil society on anti-TIP activities. Key NGOs sit on national
committees related to TIP. MSDHS, responsible for coordinating the
RTG's anti-TIP efforts, maintains a full list of all NGOs working on
TIP-related issues nationwide.

During the reporting period, the Thai Government's Anti-Trafficking
in Persons Committee (ATP) chaired by the Prime Minister and a
Coordinating and Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking in Persons Committee
(CMP) chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister conducted meetings to
push forward RTG anti-TIP efforts, as did the sub-committees and
working groups established to handle specific aspects (the
sub-committee and working groups consist of government officials
from relevant agencies, academics, and representatives from civil
society). MSDHS' National Operation Center on Prevention and
Suppression of Human Trafficking (NOCHT) is a focal point to
coordinate prevention and suppression of TIP with relevant RTG
agencies. This office is also assigned to be the secretariat of the
two national-level TIP committees (ATP and CMP). At the provincial
level, Provincial Operation Centers on Prevention and Suppression of
Human Trafficking (POCHT) in all provinces report to a central
coordinating committee.

Activities supervised by the CMP in 2009 included formal
international cooperative efforts on TIP (e.g., through the UN's
COMMMIT process and the development of memoranda of understanding,
such as with Burma); the development of guidelines on improved
cooperation between law enforcement investigation and prosecution
efforts; the development of a training curriculum for "competent
officials" under the TIP law; the development of guidelines to help
prevent fraudulent marriages between Thai women and foreign
nationals; and the creation of a working group focused on the U.S.
Department of State's TIP report.

-- D. DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE A NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION TO ADDRESS
TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS? IF THE PLAN WAS DEVELOPED DURING THE
REPORTING PERIOD, WHICH AGENCIES WERE INVOLVED IN DEVELOPING IT?
WERE NGOS CONSULTED IN THE PROCESS? WHAT STEPS HAS THE GOVERNMENT
TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT THE ACTION PLAN?

In 2009, MSDHS, under the supervision of the RTG's Coordinating and
Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking in Persons Performance (CMP)
committee, continued to develop a 2011-2016 national-level policy
and plan to combat human trafficking. In January 2010, the RTG

BANGKOK 00000468 039.2 OF 044

submitted the draft plan for comment through four public hearings
(with participation by NGOs, academia, and international agencies)
in four locations: Khon Kaen, Chiang Mai, Hat Yai, and Bangkok.
After recommendations are integrated into the national policy and
plan, it will be submitted to the cabinet for approval, hopefully
during the third quarter of 2010, according to MSDHS.

-- E: REQUIRED OF ALL POSTS: WHAT MEASURES HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN
DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD TO REDUCE THE DEMAND FOR COMMERCIAL SEX
ACTS?

Thai government law enforcement efforts to reduce customer demand
for illegal prostitution services have been limited to occasional
police raids to shut down openly operating brothels and
awareness-raising campaigns targeting tourists. These efforts are
principally conducted to reduce the prevalence of child
prostitution. Thai law enforcement authorities have been
increasingly cooperative with U.S. Embassy officials (and those from
other embassies) in a range of areas to combat the demand for
commercial sex involving children.

The RTG reportedly developed actions regarding the commercial sexual
exploitation of children as part of its 2011-2016 national-level
policy and plan to combat human trafficking as part of its national
anti-TIP strategy. It has also partnered with NGOs and members of
the hotel industry to implement a "Code of Conduct for the
Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and
Tourism" and worked with civil society to develop a "National
Roadmap towards Anti-Human Trafficking and Child Prostitution Caused
by Tourism." An NGO observer commented that RTG efforts regarding
the "National Roadmap" stalled due to the high-turnover of national
governments beginning in 2006 and that the efforts have not yet
gained full momentum.

-- F. REQUIRED OF ALL POSTS: WHAT MEASURES HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN
DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD TO REDUCE THE PARTICIPATION IN
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX TOURISM BY NATIONALS OF THE COUNTRY?

With regard to sex crimes again children, including by offenders who
travel to Thailand to commit crimes as well as those who come
fleeing justice elsewhere, Thai law enforcement authorities
increasingly cooperated with Embassy officials in a range of areas.
NGO representatives noted this cooperation is also provided to law
enforcement officials from other embassies. RTG law enforcement
officials collaborated with USG law enforcement agencies (and those
from other governments) in the investigation, arrest, prosecution,
and deportation of child sex offenders, as well as in the provision
of victim assistance. AHTD police officers were designated to carry
out surveillance and investigation and to notify the Tourist police
of any suspected cases of child-sex tourism, including those
involving Thai nationals.

The RTG sponsored TIP prevention activities, including campaigns to
warn tourists of any nationality (including Thai) of the severity of
penalties for engaging in commercial sex acts with children.

Thailand's 2008 Anti-TIP Act provides strict penalties for Thai

BANGKOK 00000468 040.2 OF 044

citizens who engage in any form of human trafficking, including
child sex tourism:

- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child between 15
to 18 years old, penalties are 6-12 years imprisonment and a fine of
120,000 to 240,000 baht (3,429-6,857 USD).

- If a trafficking offense is committed against a child below 15
years old, penalties are 8-15 years imprisonment and a fine of
160,000 to 300,000 baht (4,571 - 8,571 USD).

In addition, various sections of Thai law (including the Thai
Criminal Code as amended, the Prevention and Suppression of
Prostitution Act, and the Money laundering Act) provide severe
penalties for Thai citizens (and others) who engage in child sex
tourism (see Section III, Question A above).

-- G. REQUIRED OF ALL POSTS IN COUNTRIES THAT HAVE CONTRIBUTEED OVER
100 TROOPS TO INTERNATION PEACEKEEPING EFFORTS.

Per ref. A, paragraph 29, not applicable.

VI) PARTNERSHIPS

-- A. DOES THE GOVERNMENT ENGAGE WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTS, CIVIL
SOCIETY, AND/OR MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS TO FOCUS ATTENTION AND
DEVOTE RESOURCES TO ADDRESSING HUMAN TRAFFICKING? IF SO, PLEASE
PROVIDE DETAILS.

The Thai government deepened its broad cooperative partnerships with
other governments and civil society on TIP activities during the
reporting period, thereby contributing the RTG's efforts to
implement the TVPA's minimum standards. Collaboration between
government officials and NGOs has progressively improved in Thailand
as reflected in the Thai governments multiple MOUs on human
trafficking with other governments (both bilateral and
multilateral), Thailand's multiple provincial-level MOUs between its
different domestic regions, and the RTG's continued efforts to
improve implementation of them. Key NGOs sit on national committees
related to TIP. MSDHS, responsible for coordinating the RTG's
anti-TIP efforts, maintains a full list of all NGOs working on
TIP-related issues nationwide.

Specifically, Thailand's regional MOUs and TIP guidelines provide
procedures to the Provincial Operation Center on Prevention and
Suppression of Human Trafficking (POCHT) in each province. They
generally state the POCHT shall coordinate with members of their
multidisciplinary teams (e.g., social workers, health care
officials, psychologists, etc.). Under these procedures, police
collaborate with social workers, NGOs, and interpreters when
conducting a raid and screening for TIP victims. Trafficking
victims are also transferred to either government shelters,
occasionally for short periods of time, NGO-run shelters as
appropriate. According to an NGO that partners with the RTG on
victim assistance, training of RTG officials has improved
coordination on TIP cases.

During the reporting period, government officials increasingly enjoy
close collaborative relationships with civil society on anti-TIP
activities, including (but not limited to):

- Meetings throughout the year of the RTG's sub-committees and
working groups established to handle specific aspects of TIP. The
working group on human trafficking in the fishing industry met nine
times, and as recently as January 2010, and consists of government
and non-government officials (from both for-profit companies and
non-profit organizations).

- On June 5, MSDHS organized activities to mark the one-year
anniversary of Thailand's comprehensive TIP law. Select MSDHS
provincial-level offices also hosted awareness raising events in
cooperation with NGOs such as World Vision.

BANGKOK 00000468 041.2 OF 044

- On June 12, the RTG partnered with the International Labor
Organization (ILO) to commemorate World Day against Child Labor
(WDACL). In addition to the Bangkok event, the RTG and ILO
organized events in Tak and Pattani on June 12 and 18, respectively.
At the event in Tak, attended by approximately 1,500 individuals,
Thailand's Vice Minister of Education Chaiwut Bannawat gave a speech
regarding the RTG's "education-for-all" policy, i.e., for all
children including those of non-Thai migrants and ethnic minority
groups resident in Thailand.

- MSDHS organized anti-TIP training sessions specifically for the
"competent officials," (including social workers, police,
immigration, public health officer) as defined by the 2008 Anti-TIP
law and the relevant subordinate regulation. The Ministry expects
at least 1,000 individuals will participate in the training sessions
taking place from December 2009 to March 2010.

- The Thai Ministry of Labor in 2009, with support from the ILO,
conducted two training sessions in Thailand's upper North and the
Central region on the "Operational Guidelines for Labor
Trafficking," finalized in April 2008. Approximately 35 individuals
participated in each session. The guidelines were established to
improve coordination among members of multi-disciplinary teams,
consisting of both government and non-government officials, during
labor trafficking operations (i.e., rescue and protection).

- MSDHS reported it is working with UNODC to set up Border Liaison
Offices specific to human trafficking along the Thai-Burma border
(near Chiang Rai, Tak, and Ranong).

- MSDHS reported that in 2009, the Japanese Government's Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA) funded research to assess
the quality of services for, and satisfaction of, trafficking victim
who have been assisted through multidisciplinary approaches. The
findings from the research will be presented to the RTG to improve
quality of services through its multidisciplinary approach to
trafficked victims.

Key and updated information on the Thai government' memorandum of
understanding (MOU) agreements, bilateral and multilateral, though
which it cooperates with partners on TIP issues follow (from MSDHS
and UN sources):

-- GMS: the MOU on the Coordinated Mekong Ministerial Initiative
against Trafficking (COMMIT) was signed on October 29, 2004. This
joint declaration among six Mekong sub-region countries affirms a
political commitment to eradicating all forms of TIP in the Greater
Mekong sub region. Member countries reviewed the achievements of the
first Sub-regional Plan of Action (SPA) in 2005- 2007 and endorsed
the Second SPA 2008-2010 focusing on 7 areas: 1) Training and
Capacity Building, 2) National Plans of Action, 3) Multilateral and
Bilateral Partnerships, 4) Legal Frameworks, Law Enforcement, and
Justice, 5) Victim Identification, Protection, Recovery and
Reintegration, 6) Preventive Measures, and 7) Cooperation with the
Tourism Sector. In November 5-6 2008 COMMIT meetings, COMMIT
countries agreed to invite Malaysia to join the Initiative.

-- Cambodia: the MOU between Thailand and Cambodia on Bilateral
Cooperation for Eliminating Trafficking in Children and Women and
Assisting Victim of Trafficking, was signed on May 31, 2003. The
MOU covers cooperation in 3 areas: 1) return and reintegration, 2)
prosecution process guidelines and 3) information sharing.

BANGKOK 00000468 042.2 OF 044

-- Vietnam: the MOU between Thailand and Vietnam on Cooperation to
Combat Trafficking in Persons was signed on March 24, 2008. On March
19,
2009, governments of both nations agreed to a joint plan of action
that includes setting up a bilateral working group to combat human
trafficking, conducting an assessment of the bilateral human
trafficking situation and providing recommendations for preventive
measures, collaborating on the provision of protection and
repatriation of TIP victims, and expanding the sharing and exchange
of information on TIP in general. Teams from both countries are
drafting standard operating procedures to assist trafficking victim,
which are expected to be finalized in 2010.

-- Burma: On April 24, 2009, the RTG and Burmese government signed
an MOU on Cooperation to Combat Trafficking in Persons. The MOU
covers areas such as prevention, protection, recovery and
reintegration of victims, and law enforcement and prosecution
collaboration. A related plan of action under the MOU was concluded
in August 6, 2009 and calls for:
(i) the establishment of a joint task force,
(ii) an assessment of the bilateral human trafficking situation (to
begin in the first quarter of 2010).
(iii) coordination of multidisciplinary training on victim
protection (MSDHS will host training sessions for officials from
Thailand and Burma in the first quarter of 2010; MSDHS is developing
a TIP training curriculum for interpreters who provide services in
TIP cases and plans to provide training in 2010.
(iv) improved reintegration mechanisms.

-- B. WHAT SORT OF INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE DOES THE GOVERNMENT
PROVIDE TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO ADDRESS TIP?

The Thai government did not report the provision of direct
assistance to other countries to address TIP. It did, however,
partner with other nations on the investigation and prosecution of
transnational TIP cases, the provision of services (including
repatriation) to Thai and foreign victims of trafficking, the
training of government officials on TIP-related practices, on the
research of certain aspects of TIP, and on other cooperative
activities (see question above and others). In doing so, the RTG
assisted other governments in combating human trafficking and
meeting the minimum standards under the TVPA.

VI) NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CHILD SOLDIERS PREVENTION ACT

REPORT IF THE FOLLOWING OCCURRED: CONSCRIPTION OR FORCED RECRUITMENT
OF PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF 18 INTO GOVERNMENTAL ARMED FORCES;
VOLUNTARY RECRUITMENT OF ANY PERSON UNDER 15 YEARS OF AGE INTO
GOVERNMENTAL ARMED FORCES; THE EXTENT TO WHICH ANY PERSON UNDER THE
AGE OF 18 TOOK A DIRECT PART IN HOSTILITIES AS A MEMBER OF
GOVERNMENTAL ARMED FORCES; RECRUITMENT (FORCED OR VOLUNTARY) OF
PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF 18 BY ARMED GROUPS DISTINCT FROM THOSE OF
THE GOVERNMENTAL ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING PARAMILITARY FORCES,

BANGKOK 00000468 043.2 OF 044

ILLEGAL PARAMILITARY GROUPS, GUERRILLAS, OR OTHER ARMED GROUPS.
DESCRIBE TRENDS TOWARD IMPROVEMENT OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED PRACTICES,
INCLUDING STEPS AND PROGRAMS THE GOVERNMENT UNDERTOOK OR THE
CONTINUED OR INCREASED TOLERANCE OF SUCH PRACTICES, INCLUDING THE
ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN ENGAGING IN OR TOLERATING SUCH PRACTICES.
REPORT ABUSE OF CHILDREN RECRUITED BY ARMED FORCES OR THE ARMED
GROUPS NOTED ABOVE (E.G., SEXUAL ABUSE OR USE FOR FORCED LABOR).
DESCRIBE THE MANNER AND AGE OF CONSCRIPTION. IN DISCUSSING
ACTIVITIES OF ARMED GROUPS DISTINCT FROM THOSE OF GOVERNMENTAL ARMED
FORCES, EXPLAIN THE POSITION OF THE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE ARMED
GROUP (OPPOSITION, TOLERANCE, SUPPORT, ETC.) IN DETAIL.

Thailand's southern border provinces (SBPs) have long been host to
an ethno-nationalist Malay Muslim separatist movement rallying
around a regional "Pattani" identity. Since 2004, separatists have
conducted a violent insurgency in the provinces of Narathiwat, Yala,
Pattani, and Songkla against symbols and representatives of central
government authority, as well as against civilians, both Buddhist
and Muslim, which has resulted in thousands of deaths.

There were no reports of persons under the age of 18 conscripted or
recruited into governmental armed forces. There was limited
evidence that some village defense forces in the south at the
provincial, district, and/or village levels allowed for voluntary
induction of 17-year-old individuals; there were no reports that
such persons were directly involved in hostilities. There were
reports that separatist groups recruited teenagers under the age of
18 to carry out attacks. Human rights organizations alleged that
separatists used private Islamic schools to indoctrinate ethnic
Muslim Malay children with a separatist agenda. There were no
reports of abuse of children (e.g., sexual abuse or forced labor) by
any armed group within Thailand. (Note: see ref C, Bangkok 366, for
additional details).

Thai government armed forces in the South, concerned with their own
physical safety, were not in a position to take actions against
separatists specifically to penalize their use of child soldiers.
Nonetheless, the Royal Thai Government took multiple actions to
promote opportunities for children in the SBPs with the goal of
preventing their involvement in the violence. These include the
provision of thousands of scholarships and vocational training
activities to children in the SBPs, as well as other actions taken
by the Ministries of Defense, Justice, Social Development and Human
Security, Foreign Affairs, Labor, and Internal Security Operations
Command (ISOC). (ref L).

VII) NOMINATION OF HEROES AND BEST PRACTICES

-- HEROES: Sudjai Nakphain, Project Coordinator, World Vision
Foundation of Thailand.

Sudjai has been working with World Vision in Pattaya, Thailand for
the last seven years. Specifically, she has implemented the
"Developing the Life of Homeless Children in Pattaya" project. The
program institutes prevention, protection, and rehabilitation for
homeless children. Sudjai regularly conducts classes for orphaned
and "at-risk" children on various topics such as the dangers of drug
abuse, basic living skills, and avoiding exploitation. She also
provides shelter and supervision as part of the program.
Additionally, her program, in conjunction with assistance from the
Thai Navy, includes an intensive rehabilitation component that
provides training to teenagers in trade-based skills, such as
farming, mechanics, and construction that can be utilized in the
workplace. Her efforts have positively affected over 400 children
who were trafficked, sexually exploited, or orphaned in Thailand.

Sudjai has provided invaluable assistance in identifying, locating,
and protecting children who were victims of child sexual
exploitation in support of international law enforcement efforts.
Her expertise and direct assistance has led to numerous arrests and
prosecutions of pedophiles preying on vulnerable children in
Thailand.

BANGKOK 00000468 044.2 OF 044

Post's Consular Section vetted this nominee through the CLASS and
CCD databases; no record was found in either.

3. (SBU) Per ref A, paragraph 24, Embassy Labor Officer (FS-02)
spent approximately 50 hours in the preparation of this report. The
Economic Counselor (FE-OC) and DCM (FE-MC) spent approximately 4
hours and 3 hours on the report, respectively. Consulate Chiang
Mai's Political/Economic Chief (FS-02) spent approximately 5 hours
on the report. Likewise, Economic Section FSN (Grade 11-02) spent
approximately 100 hours on compiling information for the report.
These estimates do not include contributions made indirectly in the
regular course of work. Embassy Bangkok POC is Econ/Labor Officer
Lawrence Petroni: tel. 02-205-4639, fax 02-254-2839, email
PetroniLJ@state.gov.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you licensed for Scoop?

Scoop is free for personal use, but you’ll need a licence for work use. This is part of our Ethical Paywall and how we fund Scoop without a regular paywall. Join today with plans starting from just $11 per month, and start using Scoop like a Pro.

Join Pro Individual Find out more

Find more from Wikileaks on InfoPages.

World Headlines

WORLD

Climate Action Network: COP29 ANALYSIS - G20 Declaration And Climate Finance

While the G20 countries are the planet's biggest economies and biggest polluters - and therefore carry a huge responsibility to address the climate crisis - let's not forget that the true negotiations are happening here in Baku.

UN News: Haiti - Over 20,000 Flee As Gang Violence Spurs Mass Displacement

Over 20,000 people have fled their homes across Haiti’s capital Port-au-Prince in just four days amid escalating gang violence, with more than 17,000 seeking shelter in 15 displacement sites as critical supply chains collapse.

Kick Big Polluters Out: DeSmog Releases Analysis Of Big Ag And Food Industry Lobbyists From COP29 UNFCCC Participant Data

Along with the 1,770 fossil fuel lobbyists who accessed the talks this year, our reporting raises serious questions about the influence of powerful vested interests on the COP process.

Climate Action Network: Fossil Of The Day Award Of COP29 Presented To South Korea, New Solidarity For Justice Award Goes To The Palestinian People

With things like BTS, Samsung, and Korean BBQ, South Korea may be a trendsetter, but their finance of fossil fuels puts them firmly in the ‘has been’ category. We are honoured to stand with the Palestinian people and award them the inaugural “Solidarity for Justice” Award.

World Vision: New Research Finds Children In Asia-Pacific Suffer Mentally And Physically Due To Climate Change

Participants reported experiencing increased vulnerability to illnesses, injuries, and anxiety and depression, as climate change and disasters cause food shortage and water scarcity and put a strain on their families’ income and communities’ livelihoods.

COP29: Navigating Ocean Finance - Investing In A Sustainable Blue Future

The Ocean plays a central role in combating climate change, as highlighted in a side event that underscored the importance of investing in ocean-based climate solutions and the growing movement to recognize ocean finance as climate finance.

Join Scoop Pro

Submit News

Become a Member