Spotlight Interview with Ken Georgetti
Spotlight Interview with Ken Georgetti, President of the
Canadian Labour
Congress and Chairperson of the Global
Unions Committee on Workers'
Capital
CLC Canada: Tackling Inequality
Brussels, 12 March 2007: As in many
countries, the Canadian trade union
movement is putting
the spotlight on the growing gap between rich and
poor,
including the fact that many workers simply don't earn
enough for
a decent life. Ken Georgetti, President of
the Canadian Labour
Congress, explains.
Stagnating
wages, especially for the lowest paid, are now a
global
problem. The CLC's annual report card for 2006 is
titled "Is your work
working for you". What does this
report card show?
It shows that wages are indeed
stagnating and the quality of jobs is
deteriorating.
From 2005 to 2006, the number of workers on poverty
wages
increased by 1.5 % with around 12% of workers earning at or
below
the poverty line. Canada has an economy that the
business side is
saying is a booming economy. We have
also been experiencing "jobless
growth" and an increase
in precarious employment. People who are losing
their
jobs in the manufacturing sector can expect a minimum of a
17%
drop in their wages as they find new jobs, if they
find them. People
who are in the workforce are earning
less, and people coming into the
workforce are coming
into precarious jobs that don't pay enough. A lot
of
part-time, temporary and very low paid jobs compared to
previous
generations of workers.
What is the CLC actually calling for concerning the minimum wage?
We are
calling for a Federal minimum wage of C$10 (Euros 6.5) per
hour,
in the economic sectors regulated by the federal
governments (for
example: banking, telecommunications,
airlines.) Currently, there is no
federally-set minimum
wage - the rates are set by the individual
provinces. We
are also campaigning in each provinces to get it set
at
C$10 per hour. There are big disparities between
provinces, with a
difference of $3.50 from the lowest to
the highest. No province has a
C$10 per hour minimum
wage, which is the minimum a single person,
working full
time for a whole year, needs to be avoid poverty as it
is
defined by official statistics.
Is the gender wage gap in Canada closing?
We were making some progress on the
gender wage gap, but we lost it all
largely due to the
skyrocketing salaries at the top end of the scale
which
are mostly men. Women's wages are basically stagnant at 83%
of
men's overall. Neither the Federal or Provincial
governments are doing
anything about that. We are
pushing for federal pay equity
formulations, but this
very right-wing government is extremely reluctant
to do
anything about it.
How are young workers faring in Canada
- can they get decent jobs, and
are they joining
unions?
Their earnings a lower than a generation ago. They
mainly find
themselves stuck in precarious work, work
that is not full-time, not
fulfilling. With Canada's
programs to increase tuition fees, they are
coming out of
universities and colleges with crippling debt, so with
low
wages they are a long way from retiring that debt,
and getting into
buying houses and other goods that would
actually help our economy.
Young people are not being
organized into unions at the same rate as
older workers.
The smaller workplaces that they work in are
very
difficult to organize, so it is difficult for them
to get better wages.
They also tend to feel that the
union movement is "my father's and
mother's, not mine".
One means to approach this is work we are doing in
a
couple of jurisdictions where we have NDP* governments to
pilot a
sectoral bargaining model, where once a certain
number of collective
agreements are established in a
sector, new workers coming into the
sector would
automatically be covered. There is a huge union
advantage
across the workforce in Canada. Union members
earn on average about C$5
per hour more than non-members,
and 85% of unionized workers are covered
by benefit and
pension plans, whereas for non-union workers, about
45%
have benefit plans and about 18% have pensions.
Why aren't people beating down the doors of unions to join then?
Well, in a way, they are. A third of non-union
workers would join
unions if they had a chance and they
weren't afraid of reprisals from
their employer. In
Canada, the only Constitutional right that people
will
only exercise in secret is signing a union card! There is a
very
real fear of losing your job if you join a union.
One clear example is
that we organized three Wal Mart
stores, and when we went to start
bargaining, the company
just closed down the stores, so this intimidates
all Wal
Mart employees. And it takes months and months to get
through
the tribunal system or the courts, and the
employers exploit that. We
need a "card check" system
with just a simple majority of workers having
a union
card required to get certification - even in Manitoba, an
NDP
Province, unions need to get 65% membership sign-up
before they can get
certification.
We have also been
working to get a Bill passed in parliament to
ban
employers bringing in replacement workers during
strikes. We have been
hopeful of getting this through,
but now it looks like there may be
another election, so
we don't know if it will get through after all.
Taxation
is also a key issue. What does the CLC want to change
about
the tax system in your country?
It's ironic that
the highest rate of taxation on earnings is on "sweat"
-
those who work for wages are taxed on all of it, but if you
trade
stocks, one-half is taxed, and if you get
dividends, only a third. We
think we need tax fairness -
income is income and people should be taxed
on the basis
of their income, in a consistent and fair way. But
it's
not easy to get this message across to the public.
Our major newspapers
in Canada are all owned by the same
person, and they won't cover this
issue. Although the
French-speaking media in Quebec is a bit better.
You are
Chairperson of the ITUC Workers' Capital Committee. What
role
can union-linked pension funds play in promoting
fairness and equity?
Pension funds play a significant role
in the world's stock exchanges.
We think there need to be
rules about disclosure of how pension managers
are voting
- we have a campaign in North America with the US
union
movement to change corporate law so that
shareholders can actually
nominate directors for the
Boards of Directors, and we need to hold the
Boards much
more accountable in the way they compensate
their
executives, pay dividends to shareholders and how
they treat the
environment and their employees. We need
a more activist approach not
just to the benefits, but
also to the way money is managed. Creating
these big
pools of capital and then making them available to people
who
work against our interests, such as private equity
funds, is contrary to
my way of thinking.
The ITUC was
created a few months ago. How can the ITUC be
more
effective in working with its national affiliates on
issues such as
tackling inequality, or dealing with
capital markets?
The main thing is to decide on campaigns
and actions and to stick to
them, stay the course for the
longer term. In Canada, a measure of
success would be to
have one workplace issue become a vote-determining
issue
in an election. Organising and collective bargaining are the
core.
Let's remember, we have the largest democratic
network in the world,
with reach, depth and breadth, and
we need to utilise that capacity a
lot
more.
Interview by Tim Noonan
*NDP: New Democratic Party
Ends