Nigerian Activists: Climate Policy To Favour Poor
Nigeria's Oil Region Wants Climate Policy To Favour The Poor
Akanimo Sampson
Bureau Chief, Port Harcourt Nigeria
ENVIRONMENTAL rights activists in the Niger Delta area, Nigeria's main oil and gas province, are currently pressing the international community to ensure that climate policy will richly consider the needs of the poor people.
Patrick Naagbanton, one of the leading environmental rights advocates in the oil region, told this reporter on Tuesday that that in spite of Nigeria's enormous oil wealth, ''close to 10million people in the Niger Delta are living in acute poverty''.
Naagbanton said they are hoping that their campaign would yield some good results ''because we are not leaving any stone unturn in pressing for the freedom of our people who are living under the oil industry-induced environmental bondage''
However, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded in Brussels the previous Friday that climate change is inevitable, adaptation to it is critical and that those who contributed least to the problem will suffer the most.
"Even if, by some miracle, we could stop emitting greenhouse gases today, we will still experience climate change in the next few decades, making adaptation unavoidable," says Richard Klein, coordinator of climate policy research at the Stockholm Environment Institute and a coordinating lead author of the IPCC.
"On the other hand, without any effort in mitigation we are likely to reach a level of climate change that makes adaptation impossible for some ecosystems, while for people it could involve very high social and economic costs."
One of the political dilemmas of climate policy is the fact that the costs and benefits of climate change are not distributed equally around the world. Saleemul Huq, head of the climate change group at the International Institute for Environment and Development, points out that for some countries, particularly the poorest countries in Africa and the small island developing states, adaptation is more important than mitigation.
For
countries such as China, India and Brazil, the combination
of the two strategies is essential, says Huq, who is also a
coordinating lead author of the latest IPCC report.
John
Drexhage, director of climate change and energy at the
International Institute for Sustainable Development, and an
expert reviewer of the IPCC report, agrees: "This report
confirms a message we have been stating loud and clear for a
few years now: namely that those least responsible for
global warming - the poor, the indigenous communities - are
the ones to be the most immediately and severely impacted by
it. This is a core equity issue that must be addressed in
the international negotiations."
Tom Downing, director of the Oxford office of the Stockholm Environment Institute and a lead author of the IPCC report, adds: "Many of these linkages are opportunities to promote sustainable development and alleviate poverty. We found relatively few examples where decision-makers made explicit, economic trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation."
The report from Working Group 2 of the Fourth Assessment of the IPCC was released in Brussels on Friday 5 April 2007. Working Group 3 will present its findings on 4 May 2007 in Bangkok and the final synthesis report will be released in November of this year.
Klein, Huq, Downing and Drexhage, and the three institutes they represent, the Stockholm Environment Institute, the International Institute for Environment and Development and the International Institute for Sustainable Development, have joined forces in addressing the challenge of climate change and development. As the Global Initiative on Climate Change (GICC), they provide knowledge to policymakers to ensure that climate change is seen as a development issue as well as an environment issue.
ENDS