Slow Progress On Arms Trade

Slow Progress On Arms Trade Deal As Over 2000 Die Daily From Armed Violence

Oxfam and a coalition of NGOs reveal death toll reaches 2.1 million in three years of talks about talks – issue urgent call to launch negotiations on arms trade treaty

Talks to establish an effective international treaty on the trade in conventional arms are going at a snail’s pace because of self interest and delaying tactics by some major arms exporters, warned international agency Oxfam today. This diplomatic wrangling is taking place ahead of crucial UN talks this month and as figures show that tens of thousands continue to suffer from armed violence worldwide.

In a report published today entitled “Dying for Action”, Oxfam and 11 other NGOs who support the international Control Arms campaign, show that some 2.1 million people have died either directly or indirectly as a result of armed violence since governments agreed in 2006 on the need to regulate the arms trade. This is the equivalent of more than 2000 people per day – worse than one person killed each minute.

Governments are meeting this month at the United Nations in New York in a make-or-break debate to decide whether to officially kick start formal negotiations on creating an Arms Trade Treaty. Oxfam said that the world cannot afford to wait any longer and that a Treaty must be concluded before the end of 2012 at the latest. A robust treaty could limit the flow of weapons and ammunition and prevent arms deals that fuel poverty, conflict, armed crime and abuse of human rights.

“Armed violence costs 2000 lives every single day. Eight out of every ten governments want to get an Arms Trade Treaty agreed and ordinary citizens are calling for one too. This month we need the majority of enlightened countries at the UN to make it happen. New Zealand supports an effective arms trade treaty. Oxfam encourages the New Zealand government and governments in the Pacific region to proactively work with other supportive states to ensure this outcome. An intransigent few cannot be allowed to keep their foot on the brakes forever,” said Barry Coates, Executive Director of Oxfam New Zealand.

“Politicians must do all they can to make sure we control the flow of arms and weapons. We must change the current system where there is no effective global control on the arms trade, and where unscrupulous arms dealers can too easily send weapons to the world’s worst conflict zones,” said Coates.

Among the 2.1 million deaths – overwhelmingly of civilians – more than 700,000 have been caused by the direct and indirect impact of armed conflicts, including those in Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, and Sri Lanka, the report says. This year the world’s deadliest war in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) worsened, which pushed numbers further up.

“While the Pacific region has escaped the large-scale arms trafficking, that has plagued other regions, small arms and light weapons have managed to fuel armed conflict, violent crime and underdevelopment in many countries,” said Coates. “The proliferation and misuse of firearms was identified as the most immediate impediment to recovery in the Solomon Islands, Bougainville, and more recently to the development prospects of mainland Papua New Guinea,” he added.

The report cites several instances where governments have shown the political will to move quickly and effectively when they want. For instance, the Convention on Cluster Munitions took less than two years to complete. It took just 17 days after the terrorist attacks of 9/11 for all states to freeze the financial assets of anyone connected with terrorism.

Jan Egeland, the former UN Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs, who wrote the Foreword to the report said: “Even though there has been a marked decline in wars since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the number of violent attacks against civilians has continued at intolerable levels. Only a forceful, unambiguous and verifiable convention can control transfers and do away with the networks of illegal arms brokers that supply our generation's weapons of mass killings and mass misery.”

Oxfam and its allies say that an effective treaty would not impede a state’s right to acquire arms to be used for legitimate self-defence and law enforcement purposes. The group is calling for all international arms transfers to be authorized based on criteria centred on international human rights law, International Humanitarian Law and sustainable development.

“We need a robust treaty that would make it harder for any war lords to obtain new arms and ammunition. Dangerous arms deals like recent deals with Chad, Zimbabwe or Libya should be avoided as thousands of weapons can end up in the wrong hands. In all these cases, the sale of arms should have never been authorised,” said Oxfam’s Coates.

ENDS

© Scoop Media