FPI Overnight Brief
FPI Overnight
Brief
May 21,
2010
________________________________________
Special
Announcement
On the evening of
Wednesday, June 2, FPI Director Dan Senor will give a
first-hand report on the changing situation in the Middle
East at the Union League Club in New York City. For more
information, and to RSVP, please visit the Events page on
FPI's website. We ask that participants
confirm their attendance by Wednesday, May 26.
________________________________________
Obama
Administration
Dennis C. Blair, the president's most senior intelligence adviser, became the first high-profile departure from President Obama's national security team on Thursday. Mr. Blair, director of national intelligence, announced his resignation, effective May 28 in a five-sentence statement that ended with praise for the national intelligence bureaucracy he will no longer command. "Keep it up - I will be cheering for you," he said. A U.S. official in a position to know said, "We have been interviewing several strong candidates to be his replacement." Among the candidates are former Deputy Defense Secretary John J. Hamre, now president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies; retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James R. Clapper, the deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence; and Michael G. Vickers, a former CIA official and currently the Pentagon's assistant secretary of defense for special operations. – Washington Times
Charles Krauthammer
writes: Given Obama's policies and principles, Turkey and
Brazil are acting rationally. Why not give cover to
Ahmadinejad and his nuclear ambitions? As the United States
retreats in the face of Iran, China, Russia and Venezuela,
why not hedge your bets? There's nothing to fear from Obama,
and everything to gain by ingratiating yourself with
America's rising adversaries. After all, they actually
believe in helping one's friends and punishing one's
enemies. – Washington
Post
________________________________________
Koreas
Seoul's dramatic accusation this week that North Korea torpedoed one of its warships, killing 46 sailors, sets up what could be one of the most combustible situations in the peninsula in years -- one that could force South Korea and its top ally, the United States, to make hard decisions. Analysts say the matter must be carefully managed with a series of steps that would punish North Korea without leading to a new conflict. – Washington Post
China urged restraint Thursday after South Korea formally accused North Korea of sinking one of its warships two months ago, spotlighting Beijing's decisive role in what happens next…Korea next week plans to take its findings to the United Nations Security Council in hopes of securing some form of international condemnation or penalty against the North. China, North Korea's biggest benefactor and closest ally, holds one of Security Council's five permanent seats and can veto any action. The issue dominated the bi-weekly news conference Thursday at China's foreign ministry. Spokesman Ma Zhaoxu reacted cautiously and said China would conduct an "assessment" of the evidence, though not a formal investigation. Asked whether China doubted South Korea's findings, Mr. Ma repeated that China would assess them. "All parties should stay calm and exercise restraint," he said. – Wall Street Journal
Obama
administration officials Thursday condemned North Korea for
a torpedo attack they believe sank a South Korean naval
patrol ship in March, and began a diplomatic effort through
the United Nations to crack down on Pyongyang. Secretary of
State Hillary Rodham Clinton is expected to signal strong
U.S. support for a new round of U.N. Security Council
sanctions against North Korea when she visits Seoul on
Monday, officials said. She also will urge support of the
proposed sanctions while in China, which has more leverage
over North Korea than any other country, officials said. –
Los Angeles Times
One man who will be
closely following developments on the Korean peninsula as
tensions flare between Pyongyang and Seoul will be a
37-year-old army defector from North Korea based in London.
Following in the footsteps of Marx and Engels, Jooil Kim is
using London as a base to plot revolution with the aim of
toppling one of the world's most tyrannical regimes.. - Guardian
Editorial: This is a moment to insist on consequences for North Korea's behavior -- and to put China on the spot. As it happens, a high-level U.S. delegation, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, is headed for Beijing this weekend; Ms. Clinton should put North Korea at the top of the agenda. If China wishes to shield the regime in Pyongyang after it has been caught committing an act of war, it should be obliged to do so in the full view of its Asian neighbors, beginning with South Korea. – Washington Post
China is [North Korea’s] economic lifeline, as was shown again when Kim Jong Il, North Korea’s dictator, made a hasty trip to Beijing not long after the Cheonan incident to beg for continued economic support. At that point, Beijing had an excuse, in public at least, to take his claims of innocence at face value. It no longer does. - Economist
Michael Magan writes: UNSC sanctions and condemnation are a necessary but not sufficient step. Now is the time for both South Korea and the United States to step up and define a firm policy towards North Korea. The Lee administration needs to stop pursuing a reactive policy and firmly declare its position towards the North. South Korea should preempt another North Korean provocation by defining new rules of engagement such that if North Korea seeks reunification or economic growth, it must adhere to an international framework with clear conditions and benchmarks. The burden of compliance must be put on the North. – Shadow Government
Joshua Stanton writes: Conventional deterrence is failing because Kim Jong Il knows our low tolerance for risk and loss of life, limitations that he does not share. The sine qua non of deterrence is a credible threat. But Kim Jong Il no longer fears the U.S. Air Force; he only fears the people of North Korea. Specifically, he fears that they’ll do to him what they did to Nicolae Ceaucescu. Restoring deterrence still won’t disarm Kim Jong Il or prevent him from continuing to proliferate nuclear materials and technology. The only way to do that is to bring his misrule to an end at the lowest possible cost in human lives. Our challenge here is to deny Kim Jong Il the resources, the means, and the time to miniaturize, export, or launch a nuclear weapon. To achieve this requires us to contain, constrict, and collapse Kim Jong Il’s regime through a combination of economic strangulation and political subversion. – The New Ledger
Patrick Cronin writes:
We may never know the full truth behind the torpedo attack
until the day when North Korean archives are open to the
public. Perhaps it was indeed Kim Jong-il himself who wanted
to undermine pressure to return to the Six Party Talks. But
regardless of the reason for the torpedo attack, cautious
restraint and alliance solidarity remain the best policy
course. When the North Korean regime eventually does
transition—and perhaps collapse—it will be Seoul that
will be in the strongest position to help bring about a new
peace. – The
Diplomat
________________________________________
China
The United States on Thursday dispatched the first of a flotilla of senior officials to China for high-level economic and security meetings that are likely to be overshadowed by the rising tensions on the Korean Peninsula and the deepening debt crisis in Greece, which some fear will infect other European countries. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner are leading a delegation that will include nearly 200 policy makers and advisers, one of the largest groups of American officials ever to travel to a foreign capital for a single set of meetings. On the agenda: trying to balance the economic relationship between China and the United States, breaking down trade and investment barriers, and moving China toward a market-driven exchange rate. – New York Times
The authorities have identified a new threat to political stability in the restive region of Tibet: photocopiers. Fearful that Tibetans might mass-copy incendiary material, public security officials intend to more tightly control printing and photocopying shops, according to reports from the Tibetan capital, Lhasa. A regulation now in the works will require the operators of printing and photocopying shops to obtain a new permit from the government, the Lhasa Evening News reported this month. They will also be required to take down identifying information about their clients and the specific documents printed or copied, the newspaper said. – New York Times
Michael Auslin writes: Chinese probing is followed by a period of quiet, later broken by new claims and more assertive exercises. Throw in a wildcard like North Korea, which may decide to sink another ship, South Korean or not, and the maritime realm starts to appear decidedly treacherous. The natural response in the region is to look to the U.S. Navy for the ultimate guarantee of stability. Yet that service has been put on notice by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates that it will have to make do with smaller budgets, possibly fewer aircraft carriers and maybe no next-generation ballistic-missile submarine. At the very time that China is flexing its maritime muscle, the trend lines are heading in the wrong direction. The U.S. will continue to play its stabilizing role in the western Pacific, but with a more uncertain future and eventually, should any type of conflict break out, with greater risk. That ultimately means more risk for the Asia-Pacific as a whole. – Wall Street Journal Asia
Evan
Feigenbaum writes: tensions are growing between the way
China spends its money abroad and its goal of being viewed
as a responsible global player. Chinese leaders face
increasingly stark choices about whether and how to move
China closer to the international mainstream. And at least
some recent Chinese decisions suggest that changes might be
afoot. – Foreign
Policy
________________________________________
Iran
A
draft U.N. resolution that would impose sanctions on Iran,
including limits on global arms transfers, will not block
the controversial transfer of Russian S-300 missiles to the
Iranian military, according to U.S. and Russian officials.
The Obama administration had opposed the S-300 sale because
the system is highly effective against aircraft and some
missiles. The CIA has said the S-300 missiles, which have
been contracted by Tehran but not delivered, will be used to
defend Iranian nuclear facilities. – Washington Times
Alex Vatanka writes: For the moment, the opposition continues to fully adhere to the principle of non-violence. But pushing the IRGC back into the garrisons does not seem to be in the offing. If anything, the recent organizational and personnel changes in the IRGC, combined with daily warnings to the opposition from its senior commanders, indicate that at the moment the primary objective of the IRGC is to establish itself as the undisputed power broker in the Islamic Republic. – Journal of International Security Affairs
Michael Anton writes: [T]he damage has been done. Iran has done what it always does when confronted by the specter of international consensus—feint, make a deal, concede on the margins, buy time. In this instance that time has been bought very cheaply. Its value to Iran’s burgeoning nuclear program is nonetheless priceless. – The Weekly Standard Blog
Daniel Goure
writes: Take the model of North Korean brinksmanship
demonstrated by its sinking of the South Korean Navy vessel
and apply it to Iran and the Middle East. Both nations see
themselves as unique players on the world stage. They desire
that their respective regions, but really the entire world,
revolve around them. Both engage in confrontational behavior
precisely in order to provoke reactions. Both justify and
even encourage punitive measures such as sanctions in order
to justify their isolation from the world community and
their militancy. Both need a protective shield under which
they can engage in an undeclared war against their enemies.
The North has such a shield. Iran is on its way to getting
one. – Early Warning
Blog
________________________________________
Turkey
It was supposed to be a triumph for Turkey’s new foreign policy. But only days after the signing of a deal designed by Turkey and Brazil to cool down the row over Iran’s nuclear programme, tensions are rising between the government in Ankara and its key ally, the United States, over Washington’s insistence on going ahead with fresh sanctions against Tehran. – The National
Ahmet Davutoglu writes: Turkey's foreign-policy objectives and its vision of how to achieve them are very clear. Turkey has multiple goals over the next decade: First, it aims to achieve all EU membership conditions and become an influential EU member state by 2023. Second, it will continue to strive for regional integration, in the form of security and economic cooperation. Third, it will seek to play an influential role in regional conflict resolution. Fourth, it will vigorously participate in all global arenas. Fifth, it will play a determining role in international organizations and become one of the top 10 largest economies in the world. These goals aim to build a strong and respectable Turkey that is able to make an original contribution to the world community. To achieve them, Turkey must make progress in all directions and in every field, take an interest in every issue related to global stability, and contribute accordingly. This collective effort will make Turkey a global actor in this century. Turkey's actions are motivated by a great sense of responsibility, entrusted to it by its rich historical and geographic heritage, and by a profound consciousness of the importance of global stability and peace. – Foreign Policy
Melik Kaylan writes:
Buffering Iran from Western animosity might avoid trouble in
the short term, but he should take a closer look at the
regime in Tehran. No matter if Turkey wants "zero problems,"
Erdogan cannot unilaterally make the mullahs peaceable with
gestures of neutrality. Investing in pan-Islamic tolerance
and harmony looks and sounds great--who wouldnt want
it?--but the realities of the Islamic world belie the ideal.
As it stands, Erdogan is simply postponing a massive
reckoning. He's doing it by weakening his own military and
empowering the expansion of age-old rival powers. Peace now?
Sure. Peace in the future? Very unlikely. - Forbes
________________________________________
Middle
East
Palestinian negotiators have surprised Washington with a bold opening offer to White House peace envoy George Mitchell that includes concessions on territory beyond those offered in past Palestinian-Israeli peace talks, according to officials briefed on the current negotiations. The Palestinians' unexpected offer has been greeted warily in Israel and by some members of the Obama administration, according to these officials. Palestinians believe Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has no intention of reaching a peace deal and thus may have calculated they can make generous offers without having to worry about following through, these officials said. – Wall Street Journal
Iraq’s leading politicians — government ministers, clerics and sheiks, not a single woman among them — gathered Thursday over a lunch of roasted meat and rice at the arabesque Peace Palace on the bank of the Tigris. It was an effort to foster reconciliation after the country’s intensely disputed election, but ended with little of it in evidence. – New York Times
Like a lot of Yemen's countryside - northern and southern - a network of sheiks and local leaders, not Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh's regime, governs the area. But unlike other regions, where sheiks peacefully rule their private fiefdoms with the apparent blessings of the central government, much of the south is held by a growing separatist movement that seeks to end the 20-year-old union between northern and southern Yemen. – Washington Times
Mohammed ElBaradei’s return to Egypt three months ago reinvigorated the country’s opposition movement and generated widespread optimism that change was coming. While hopes are still high, Mr ElBaradei’s prolonged absences from the public scene since his return have many Egyptians wondering where exactly their new-found leader is and what he is doing. – The National
More than a hundred
[tribes] are spread across Iraq, some with a quarter of a
million members, many of them cutting across sectarian
lines. Local politics has been run mainly by tribal leaders
ever since they wrested control of vast stretches of land
from insurgent groups two or three years ago, bringing a
measure of calm to Iraq. For the first time, therefore, the
tribes command the national stage. With the main political
parties deadlocked after an inconclusive election, the
tribes are courted as potential allies by leaders on all
sides, and could act as one of several kingmakers. - Economist
________________________________________
Nuclear
Weapons/Missile Defense
Doug Feith and Abram Shulsky write: Moving toward "nuclear zero" is a signature theme of this administration. President Barack Obama's vision of a world without nuclear weapons is certainly grand. The problem is that our current policies lack coherence and rest on other-worldly assumptions. – Wall Street Journal
Baker Spring and
Owen Graham write: When viewed together, it is clear that
the treaty’s Preamble, the Russian
unilateral statement on missile defense, and remarks by
senior Russian officials suggest an attempt by Russia to
limit or constrain future U.S. missile defense capabilities
by threatening to withdraw from the treaty should the U.S.
expand its current capabilities. And by outward appearances,
the Russians appear to have succeeded. – The
Foundry
________________________________________
Afghanistan
The
Obama administration, after pulling out all the stops last
week to show some love and affection to President Hamid
Karzai of Afghanistan, is giving the cold shoulder to Mr.
Karzai’s vanquished political rival, Abdullah Abdullah.
– New York Times
A leading Afghan politician is warning American lawmakers that "the opportunity is shrinking" to salvage the U.S effort in Afghanistan that he said is close to irreversible failure. Abdullah Abdullah, who is also the former Afghan foreign minister, told The Washington Examiner, that the Afghan people are losing hope in the efforts of U.S. and NATO forces, and that the coalition mission has "no consistent message for the people of Afghanistan." He said he has shared that warning with several U.S. senators and House members of both parties in key committee positions during a series of meetings in recent days. – Washington Examiner
An Afghan
Government delegation has met representatives of Afghan
insurgent groups in the Maldives, it was claimed yesterday,
and is to do so again this weekend. The alleged talks were
confirmed by Maldives Government officials. Muhammad
Zuhair, a Maldives Government spokesman, said that 15 Afghan
government representatives took part with seven Taleban
members. The Afghan Government denied, however, that its
representatives were present in the Maldives and insisted
that its focus for a reconciliation with the Taleban and
other groups remained the “Peace Jirga” of tribal
representatives that is to be held in Kabul at the end of
the month. – Times of
London
________________________________________
Defense
Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) is in a politically awkward position on the Pentagon’s “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Democratic leaders, working with gay-rights activists, are looking for ways to scrap the ban on openly gay men and women serving in the military. But Skelton, a GOP target this fall and one of the original architects of the ban, opposes efforts to repeal it. The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee has been able so far to fend off efforts to alter the law. But Skelton is facing an uphill battle when the House votes on the defense authorization bill, which may occur next week. Repealing the ban could become a contentious debate complicating the passage of the bill that Skelton will manage on the House floor. – The Hill
The U.S. House Armed Services Committee has approved a provision overhauling a special panel charged with assessing Quadrennial Defense Reviews. The panel approved its version of 2011 defense authorization legislation May 19, a bill that would create a new QDR review panel with eight of 10 members appointed by congressional defense committee leaders. According to the provision, the defense secretary would appoint the other two members. "The panel would allow for a truly independent review of the QDR and would provide guidance to the secretary on the conduct of the QDR to ensure that the review adequately addresses all the required elements," the panel's summary states. – Defense News
About $65 billion for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps procurement and research-and-development programs was approved late May 20 by the House Armed Services Committee - nearly 9 percent of the total $726 billion markup for the fiscal 2011 defense authorization bill. The committee, with few exceptions, voted to support the Obama administration's budget requests. – Defense News
The U.S. military's workhorse rifle - used in battle for the last 40 years - is proving less effective in Afghanistan against the Taliban's more primitive but longer range weapons. As a result, the U.S. is reevaluating the performance of its standard M-4 rifle and considering a switch to weapons that fire a larger round largely discarded in the 1960s. – Associated Press
Greg Grant and Colin
Clark report: Pentagon sources tell DoD Buzz that planners
aren’t just looking at cutting tail; serious cuts in tooth
are also being considered. Specifically,senior Pentagon
leaders may cut Army and Marine force levels back to where
they were before Gates boosted the land forces in early 2007
by 92,000; 65,000 additional soldiers and 27,000 more
Marines. The plan would be to slowly ramp down the boots
starting by fiscal year 2014, eventually getting the Marines
back to 180,000 total and the Army to 482,000. That plan is,
of course, contingent on the continued withdrawal of troops
from Iraq and at least some reduction in Afghanistan troop
levels. Such reflects the thinking among some Pentagon
strategists that the counterinsurgency wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan have swung the military far from its traditional
way of fighting, which is to rely on firepower and standoff
strike to dispatch foes, rather than engage in the nasty
close quarters combat where American high-tech advantages
are nullified. – DoD
Buzz
________________________________________
The
War
The House Armed Services Committee
approved legislation Wednesday that would require the
Pentagon's inspector general to conduct an investigation
into whether defense attorneys for detainees at the
detention facility at U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,
acted improperly…The detainee measure was sponsored by
Rep. Jeff Miller, Florida Republican, and directs the
Pentagon inspector general to investigate whether attorneys
may have acted improperly or violated laws related to
detainee operations at the Cuban prison. The amendment
still faces a full House vote as part of the bill, which
then must be reconciled with the Senate version. – Washington
Times
________________________________________
Russia/Ukraine
There is no point sulking or being belligerent with the West, the Kremlin seems to have decided. As Mr Putin has said, Russia should present a smiling face to the world. A smile, however, does not alter nature; the Russian shift has occurred without significant change inside the country. Russia has not become less corrupt or more democratic. Russian troops remain in part of Georgia; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the former Yukos boss, is still in jail. Russia has not abandoned its claim to a privileged interest in the neighbourhood. - Economist
Andrew Wilson writes: Mr. Yanukovich has now signed a huge number of agreements with Russia, most notably the deal to swap an extra 25 years for the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Crimea for a 30 percent reduction in the price of gas. Ukraine has also agreed to big deals on cooperation in the nuclear industry and in aviation, a 10-year economic cooperation plan, and common positions on Transnistria and security in the Black Sea region that have disturbed neighbors like Moldova and Georgia. And Mr. Yanukovich has backed Mr. Medvedev’s pet European Security Initiative and its goal to “eliminate the dangerous dividing lines that have appeared in the European region over the past decade.”…This new Ukrainian foreign policy is something of a mystery. Even some old hands are wondering why Ukraine is huddling so close to Russia, and why it has conceded so much so quickly. – International Herald Tribune
Sacha
Tessier-Stall and Kateryna Zarembo write: It is too early
to say that President Yanukovich is intentionally helping
Russia “steal” Ukraine from the West. He is more
positively inclined toward Moscow than his predecessor, but
the truth is that he has been pushed into a corner by a
combination of geopolitical ineptness, special interests and
pre-existing problems. The real question is whether he
takes his obligations (constitutional and otherwise)
seriously. If he doesn’t, both the West and Russia are in
for unpleasant surprises. – International Herald
Tribune
________________________________________
NATO
Conrad
Black writes: NATO should become the foundation of a new
alliance system, in which all passable democracies (a
criterion the original NATO waived in several cases) agree
on the defense of their own borders, including a carefully
crafted policy of preemptive assault against plausibly
apprehended terrorism, including defined failed states. NATO
could also make parallel agreements with important
non-democratic states such as Russia and China. – National Review
Online
________________________________________
Japan
Japan
and the U.S. plan to settle a fight over a U.S. airbase this
month, largely in line with Washington's wishes, reports
said May 20, a day before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
visits Tokyo. Under the deal, expected to be officially
announced on May 28, the base would be relocated within
Okinawa island rather than moved elsewhere, as agreed by
previous conservative governments in Tokyo and Washington. -
AFP
________________________________________
Mexico
Mexican
President Felipe Calderón, speaking to a joint session of
Congress Thursday, pleaded for more help in limiting the
flow of weapons to Mexico, saying they were contributing to
the devastating drug violence in his country. In a speech
punctuated by applause and standing ovations, Calderón
thanked lawmakers for providing hundreds of millions of
dollars to bolster his country's fight against drug gangs.
He emphasized his government's resolve to confront the
narco-traffickers, who have killed more than 20,000 people
in Mexico in recent years. However, he said, Mexico needs
greater U.S. assistance stopping the flow of assault weapons
and other deadly arms across the border. – Washington
Post
________________________________________
Africa
A
bipartisan group of lawmakers says the Obama administration
must speak out against human rights violations in Ethiopia
ahead of elections in the Horn of Africa nation on Sunday.
In a letter to Johnnie Carson, assistant secretary of state
for African affairs, the lawmakers expressed concern that
"in the weeks and months prior to the May 23 elections in
Ethiopia, the government of Meles Zenawi has acted to
suppress democratic opposition voices." According to Human
Rights Watch, "the Ethiopian government is waging a
coordinated and sustained attack on political opponents,
journalists, and rights activists" ahead of the elections.
The lawmakers said opposition candidates, including Birtukan
Mideksa, have been assaulted or detained by police, and many
opposition groups have been prevented from opening local
offices. – Washington
Times
________________________________________
Thailand
After a frenzy of shooting, arson and looting, authorities in Thailand imposed a jittery order Thursday, turning the center of the vibrant capital into an armed camp and extending for three days a nighttime curfew there and in other parts of the country convulsed by unrest. – Washington Post
Analysis: The
country’s divisions and enmities have only deepened.
Nothing has been resolved. The battle for power between
social classes and between the politicians who manipulate
them continues. An early election promised by Prime Minister
Abhisit Vejjajiva is off the table after protest leaders
rejected it last week and vowed to fight on. The leaders
were arrested Wednesday as the final battle for the protest
site began, and there seemed to be no one left with whom the
government could negotiate…Hopes for a peaceful election,
whenever it comes, seem faint, and in an increasingly
polarized and violent political arena, it seems unlikely
that the loser will accept the results. – New York
Times
________________________________________
Announcements
FPI has developed Foreign Policy 2010, a briefing book available on the FPI website, which pulls together articles and op-eds from leading thinkers in each of the key foreign policy issue areas. FPI will be updating the briefing book on a regular basis throughout 2010. To suggest additional articles or content for the briefing book, please email info@foreignpolicyi.org.
If you believe in our mission and would like to support our activities, please consider making a donation to the Foreign Policy Initiative to ensure our future success.
FPI is on Facebook and Twitter . We encourage you to follow us and
spread the word to your
friends.
________________________________________
Events
China in the Americas
Center for
Strategic and International Studies
May 21
Hezbollah and the Next War With
Israel
Middle East Institute
May 21
The Evolution of NATO: The 2010
Strategic Concept and Beyond
Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars
May 21
The NPT Review Conference: Where Do We
Stand?
Hudson Institute
May 24
Cyber ShockWave: Ensuring We're
Ready
Bipartisan Policy Center
May 24
Radicalization and Counter-Radicalization in
Indonesia
Center for Strategic and International
Studies
May 24
Warring Futures
New America
Foundation
May 24
Our Region and the World: A View from
Turkey
Young Professionals in Foreign Policy
May
24
Failing Health Systems in the former Soviet
Union
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
May 24
The US and Cuba: Implications of an Economic
Relationship
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
May 24
The Role of Strategic Arms Control In A
Post-Cold War World
Senate Foreign Relations
Committee
May 25
Iraq's Political Crisis
Institute for
the Study of War
May 25
Conservatives, China, and the Legacy of
Walter Judd
Heritage Foundation
May 25
Screening of "Terror in
Mumbai"
Heritage Foundation
May 25
Keeping a Finger on Electromagnetic
Pulse
Heritage Foundation
May 25
Necessary Secrets: National Security, the
Media, and the Rule of Law
Hudson Institute
May
25
PONI: US Nuclear Declaratory
Policy
Center for Strategic and International
Studies
May 25
Symposium on Complex
Operations
YPFP/NDU
May 25
The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule
in Cyberspace
National Endowment for Democracy
May
25
Moving the Transatlantic Partnership Beyond
the Prague Agenda
Atlantic Council
May 25
Kosovo Two Years On
United States
Institute of Peace
May 25
Legitimizing the Illegitimate: Burma's
Political Dilemmas
Woodrow Wilson International
Center for Scholars
May 25
The Closing of the Muslim
Mind
Heritage Foundation
May 26
Thailand on the Brink
National
Endowment for Democracy
May 26
WSARA 2009 Progress Report
Center for
Strategic and International Studies
May 26
How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of
Stable Peace
New America Foundation
May 26
The Politics of
Bosnia-Herzegovina
United States Institute of
Peace
May 26
Arsenal of Democracy
Center for
American Progress
May 26
China, Latin America, and the US: The New
Triangle
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
May 26
US-Mexico Security
Cooperation
Border, Maritime, and Global
Counterterrorism Subcommittee
House Foreign Affairs
Committee
May 27
The Art of Command in Counterinsurgency
Operations
American Enterprise Institute
May
27
The Grand Jihad
Heritage
Foundation
May 27
The Role of Media in Humanitarian
Crises
National Endowment for Democracy
May
27
Police in Counterinsurgency
United
States Institute of Peace
May 27
Hudson Institute Film Festival
Hudson
Institute
May 31
(NYC) - The Changing Middle East: A
First-Hand Assessment from the Ground
Foreign Policy
Initiative
June 2
Threats to Maritime Security
United
States Institute of Peace
June 2
A Screening of the Oscar-nominated Film
Katyn
Heritage Foundation
June 3
Trends and Implications of Military
Expenditures in South America
Brookings
Institution
June 3
Cybersecurity Discussion w/Gen. Keith
Alexander, Director of the NSA
Center for Strategic
and International Studies
June 3
China, India, and the Future of
Democracy
National Endowment for Democracy
June
3
Iran: The Year of Reckoning
Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars
June 4
Prospects for Change in
Turkmenistan
National Endowment for Democracy
June
3
Neoconservatism: The Biography of a
Movement
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
June 7
Russia as a Donor: What is Behind the
Increase in Multilateral Aid?
Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars
June 7
Shifting the Balance in Asia: Indian
Military Modernization
American Enterprise
Institute
June 8
Terrorists, Drug Traffickers, and Gangs in
Latin America
Hudson Institute
June 9
Overcoming Pakistan's Population
Challenge
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
June 9
Bashar's Syria at 10
American
Enterprise Institute
June 10
Shaping the Agenda: Security in the 21st
Century
Center for A New American Security
June
10
President Yanukovych's Economic
Policy
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
June 14
Islamic Feminism and Beyond: The New
Frontier
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
June 15
Religious Freedoms in Today's
Russia
Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars
June 15
How Obama's Vision of a Nuclear-Free World
Weakens American Security
Heritage Foundation
June
16
Asia Policy Assembly 2010
Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars
June 17
A Chance in Hell: The Men Who Triumphed Over
Iraq's Deadliest City
Woodrow Wilson International
Center for Scholars
June 30
The Overnight Brief is a daily product of the Foreign Policy Initiative, which seeks to promote an active U.S. foreign policy committed to robust support for democratic allies, human rights, a strong American military equipped to meet the challenges of the 21st century, and strengthening America's global economic competitiveness. To submit comments or suggestions, email overnight@foreignpolicyi.org.
ENDS