Japanese Nuclear Disaster: Why We're Concern, By Bassey
Japanese Nuclear Disaster: Why We're Concern, By
Bassey
EXECUTIVE Director of Environmental Rights Action (ERA), Nnimmo Bassey, has explained why some 50 Right Livelihood Award Laureates and environmentalists jointly reacted on the severe damage to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Japan.
Bassey, who
is the Chair of Friends of the Earth International
(FoEI)
told AkanimoReports in an on-line chat on Thursday
that the disaster in
Japan has demonstrated once again
the limits of human capability to keep dangerous
technologies free from accidents with catastrophic
results.
''We strongly hold the view that natural
disasters combined with human
error have proven a potent
force for undermining even the best laid plans. Reliance on
human perfection reflects a hubris that has led to other
major failures of dangerous technologies in the past, and
will do so in the future.
''What has occurred as a result of the confluence of natural disaster and human error in Japan could also be triggered purposefully by means of terrorism or acts of war. In addition to accidental or purposeful destruction, nuclear power plants pose other threats to humanity and to the human future'', he said.
The activists say the large amounts of radioactive
wastes that are
created by nuclear power generation will
remain highly toxic for many times longer than human
civilization has existed, and there is currently no
long-term solution to dealing with the threats these
radioactive wastes pose to the environment and human health.
Further, nuclear power plants, with their large societal
subsidies, have diverted financial and human resources from
the development of safe and reliable forms of renewable
energy.
The rest of their joint statement however went thus:
''Nuclear power programs use and create
fissile materials that can be
used to make nuclear
weapons, and thus provide a proven pathway to nuclear
weapons proliferation. Several countries have already used
civilian nuclear programs to provide the fissile materials
to make nuclear weapons. Other countries, particularly those
with plutonium reprocessing and uranium enrichment
facilities, could easily follow suit if they decided to do
so. The spread of nuclear power plants will not only make
the world more dangerous, but will make more difficult, if
not impossible, the goal of a nuclear weapons-free
world.
''Nuclear power is neither the answer to
modern energy problems nor a
panacea for climate change
challenges. There is no solution of problems
by creating
more problems. Nuclear power doesn’t add up economically,
environmentally or socially. Of all the energy options,
nuclear is the most capital intensive to establish,
decommissioning is prohibitively expensive and the financial
burden continues long after the plant is closed.
''The tragedy in Japan has raised global awareness of the extreme dangers that can result from nuclear power generation. Grave as these dangers are, however, they are not as great as those arising from the possession, threat and use of nuclear weapons – weapons that have the capacity to destroy civilization and end most life on the planet.
''The conclusion we draw from the nuclear power plant accident in Japan is that the human community, acting for itself and as trustees for future generations, must exercise a far higher level of care globally in dealing with technologies capable of causing mass annihilation, and should phase out, abolish and replace such technologies with alternatives that do not threaten present and future generations. This applies to nuclear weapons as well as to nuclear power reactors''.
ENDS