U.N. Censures Syria But Waters Down Rejection of Assad
PRESS RELEASE
U.N. Censures Syria But
Waters Down Rejection of
Assad's 2013 Bid for Human
Rights Council Seat
Deleted from U.S.
draft: "the current Syrian government’s announced
candidacy for the Human Rights Council in 2014 fails to meet
the standards for Council membership."
GENEVA, July 6
- The Geneva-based human rights group UN Watch
welcomed today's strong censure of Syria by
the UN Human Rights Council but expressed concern over the
removal by the U.S. of its own proposed language rejecting
Assad's declared 2013 bid for a seat the following year on
the 47-nation body.
"We had urged the U.S. and the EU to
resist the pressure by Syria's allies and not to water down
a council statement rejecting the candidacy of Syria's
Assad, who is a tyrant and mass murderer," said UN Watch
executive director Hillel Neuer.
"While today's
resolution was strong overall, the council squandered a
golden opportunity to set a new tone regarding its
composition, which remains a serious issue given its
election of Libya's Gaddafi only two years ago, the
membership today of Russia, China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia,
and the imminent election of Pakistan and Hugo Chavez's
Venezuela."
As reported exclusively by UN Watch,
the U.S. on Wednesday had circulated a draft resolution which "stress[ed] that
the current Syrian government’s announced candidacy for
the Human Rights Council in 2014 fails to meet the standards
for Council membership." (See U.S. July 4th draft, par. 14.)
However, during off-camera sessions attended by UN
Watch, delegates from Russia, China, Cuba, Egypt and Brazil
opposed any mention of Syria's candidacy.
"The result,"
said Neuer, "is today's watered-down paragraph [see par. 19] that makes
only a general reference to standards for council
membership, but which drops the originally proposed
rejection of Assad's preposterous bid to become a world
arbiter of human rights."
The idea to opt for an
abstract reference was raised by Brazil during the Wednesday
morning session, reported UN Watch, and supported by
Russia.
Another indirect reference to Assad's candidacy
came in comments today to the council plenary by U.S.
Ambassador Eileen Donahoe. Noting that Syria's actions
contradicted the principles of the Human Rights Council, she
said that "no state that engages in such actions should
serve on this council."
Human rights activists, however,
said they would have preferred the direct language. "Should
the Assad regime remain in power and continue with its
candidacy for a council seat next year -- a bid originally
announced in May 2011 when it traded places with Kuwait --
regrettably we will be in a weaker position to stop it given
the council's decision to drop the express rejection of
Syria's credentials."
"The tragic reality at the U.N. is
that even though Syria has been roundly condemned, UNESCO in
November elected Syria to two human rights committees, and
so we cannot exclude the possibility that the Assad regime
will be elected next year to the U.N.'s top rights body,"
said Neuer.
CLICK FOR MORE
BACKGROUND