UK accused setting a ''poverty trap'' for African farmers
UK UNDER FIRE OVER AID POLICY FOR AFRICAN FARMERS
THE
United Kingdom, UK, is currently being accused of setting up
a
''poverty trap'' for African farmers.
The Africa
Centre for Biosafety, ACB, supported by Food &
Water
Europe and the Gaia Foundation, on Friday, wrote to
UK Ministers for
International Development, Business and
Environment asking for
evidence for the basis of UK
overseas aid policy.
ACB recently published a searing
critique of the Alliance for a Green
Revolution in Africa
(known as AGRA, supported by agribusiness
multinationals
and the Gates Foundation). The study finds the scheme
is
ultimately not about developing lasting solutions to hunger,
but
imposing a cash economy on African agriculture that
will inevitably
result in farmers becoming dependent on
the multinational corporations
profiting from the
hardship that will follow.
AGRA effectively seeks to
institutionalize biopiracy by accessing
publicly
available genetic resources, patenting or imposing
other
intellectual property rights on the resulting
seeds, and then using
these industrial monoculture crops
to channel African farmers into
focusing on earning
enough export cash to buy the privatised seed.
The AGRA
model uses free inputs to develop monopoly control over
outputs
and expects farmers to pay for seeds they
previously shared and
traded, and played a major part in
developing over thousands of years.
AGRA’s model creates
the foundation for the expansion of
biotechnology and
synthetic agricultural inputs, a combination that
has
proved disastrous in other parts of the world -- notably
among
Indian cotton farmers, whose families are still
suffering from the
tens of thousands of suicides that
have resulted from the debts
incurred.
Farmers should
keep their focus on feeding people, and experience
shows
they can best do this by retaining control over their
own
resources, not permitting profit-driven
multinationals to take over
and concentrate power away
from those doing the work.
ACB Director Mariam Mayet said:
“We’ve seen this model too many times already,
and the outcome
isn’t good. Western economies are
suffering hugely from the problems
indebtedness causes.
If the UK is serious about supporting the small
farmers
in Africa who are feeding the majority of the people, it
needs
to explain how handcuffing farmers to debt and an
agrochemical
treadmill is going to be more effective than
low cost, proven
approaches of looking after the soil and
maintaining seed systems.
“The UK would do far more good
if it was honest about the impacts
IMF-imposed structural
adjustment policy has already had in Africa and
putting
them right rather than ramping up the damage. Forcing
whole
countries into a cycle of providing agricultural
commodities for
others in order to buy inputs to produce
yet more exports for the
profit of external corporations
smacks of recolonisation. It’s a
very dangerous game to
play.”
Liz Hosken of the Gaia Foundation adds:
"African farmers urgently need to regain control
over their
traditional seed diversity, which enables them
to adapt to climate
instability and spread their risks.
AGRA’s strategy, a legacy of the
so-called “Green
Revolution”, creates farmer dependence on a
few
corporate-controlled seeds and agro-chemicals, which
fail to meet
farmers' diverse nutritional and
agricultural requirements. There is
nothing 'green' about
this approach. Concentrating power over Africa's
food
supply in the hands of a few corporations defies all
logic."
Food & Water Europe Food Policy Advisor Eve Mitchell said:
“AGRA is all about making money, but
Africans will never see the
bulk of it. Among other
things, it is not acceptable that UK taxpayer
money is
being used to turn public genetic resources and
traditional
knowledge in Africa into privatised crops,
especially in conditions of
structural increases in food
and agricultural input costs. Exporting
agricultural
technofixes might seem like a way to reap future
profits
and put a sticking plaster on the UK economy for
a while, but this is
at the expense of food producers and
consumers in Africa. The UK
Government claims all its
policy is based on evidence. We’d like to
see the basis
for the decision to back AGRA''.
ENDS