ITF Unions Show Support for ILWU in Grain Dispute
21 January 2013
ITF Unions
Show Support for ILWU in Grain
Dispute
ITF-affiliated unions around the world are showing support for their colleagues in the ILWU (International Longshore and Warehouse Union) in what could be a major labour showdown in the Pacific Northwest of the USA.
Multinational grain companies who are currently making record profits have reportedly hired replacement non-union workers to take over work currently being done by ILWU members in case of a lockout in the Ports of Seattle, Tacoma, and Vancouver, Washington, and Portland, Oregon.
Solidarity with their docker colleagues was nicely shown this week, when ITF US West Coast coordinator Jeff Engels boarded the vessel Ramada Queen at United Grain in Vancouver, and found that the captain and crew were well aware of the ILWU’s labour dispute, and that they expressed solidarity with the ILWU on behalf of their own union, the Japanese Seamen’s Union (JSU).
Jeff Engels explained: “The captain and seafarers had learned of the ILWU’s struggle weeks ago, while they were still docked in Asian ports. As union members themselves, who are among 4.5 million workers united as affiliates of the ITF, they knew the players involved as well as the high stakes for workers.”
JSU contracts include an ITF solidarity clause that its members will honour other unions’ picket lines (see below). The JSU had informed the ship’s owner of this clause.
“The crew reiterated that they stand one hundred percent in solidarity with their brothers and sisters in the ILWU,” Jeff Engels said.
The ILWU reports that global grain giants are attacking an 80-year-old collective bargaining agreement they have had with the union since 1934. Negotiations began in late August 2012 and ended without a contract in mid-December, with the employer barely budging from its non-starter, concessionary proposals, which are said to be seemingly designed to create an impasse. The members are now working under an imposed contract.
“Seafarers from around the world are grateful for the ILWU’s solidarity over the decades,” said Engels. “They’re eager to have the opportunity to support the ILWU in their campaign to secure a good contract with the global grain merchants. They understand that workers need to stick together, or we’ll all be exploited by corporations that put profit above the wellbeing of workers.”
Corporate owners of the six elevators involved in current negotiations include Japanese powerhouses Mitsui and Marubeni, Netherlands-based Louis Dreyfus Commodities, and United States-based Cargill and CHS.
The companies have hired JR Gettier and Associates, a known strikebreaking firm, and union longshoremen (dockers) have seen replacement workers milling about the facilities.
“The global grain giants control the world’s food supply, and they’re trying to use that power to break unions, even as they are making record profits,” said Engels. “The global network of solidarity among workers provides a counterweight to the power of these corporations.”
ITF president and chair of the ITF dockers' section, Paddy Crumlin, said: “When you sign up to the ITF you sign up to watching out for your mates. That's what solidarity is, and that's what's built into everything we do. I am heartened and not surprised to see this crew spreading that message.
“We don't like employers who pretend to be interested in negotiation but reach for union busting strategies instead. That behaviour has been noticed, and here comes the warning: our friends in the ILWU can be sure of worldwide support against that type of behaviour .”
Acting ITF general secretary Steve Cotton added: “ITF unions are on standby to help their colleagues in the US. Whether it's on ships or in ports, workers are watching what happens next and planning accordingly.”
--
Solidarity clause in ITF
agreements:
Article 3.2:
“Where a vessel is in a port where an official trade
dispute involving an ITF-affiliated dock workers’ union is
taking place, neither ship’s crew nor anyone else on board
whether in permanent or temporary employment by the Company
shall be instructed or induced to undergo cargo handling and
other work, traditionally and historically done by members
of that union which would affect the resolution of such a
dispute. The Company will not take any punitive measures
against any seafarer who respects such dockworkers’ trade
dispute and any such lawful act by the Seafarer shall not be
treated as any breach of the Seafarer’s contract of
employment, provided that this act is lawful within the
country it is
taken.”
ENDS