Another outrageous UN appointment
Another outrageous UN appointment
Only U.S. can stop
these outrageously partisan and problematic
appointments
GENEVA, 28 March,
2014— Bowing to new pressure from the powerful
Arab Group in the race to replace
controversial official Richard Falk, the president of the
U.N. Human Rights Council has decided to ignore the vetting
committee’s official choice, and instead appoint
Christine Chinkin — co-author of the
Goldstone Report, and a law professor at the London School
of Economics – as the UN’s next special rapporteur on
“Israel’s violations of the bases and principles of
international law.”
In a second highly controversial
move, the president also announced that he would name Falk’s
wife, former Turkish government adviser Hilal Elver, to
another top U.N. human rights post.
The only power that
can yet stop these outrageously partisan and problematic
appointments before tomorrow’s plenary decision is the
Obama Administration.
When council president
Baudelaire Ndong Ella tomorrow moves the
nominations, the U.S. — if it is to live up to its pledge
to use its UNHRC membership to fight bias, politicization
and double standards — must take the floor, call a vote,
and vote No.
Because the UN desperately seeks to make such appointments by consensus, the president may change his mind if he knows in advance and for certain that the U.S would challenge these two objectionable nominations.
If the U.S.
fails to call a vote and stand up for what is right, it will
have forfeited its moral justification for serving on a
council that just elected Putin, the Castro regime, the
Chinese Communist Party, and the House of Saud.
Like her
husband Richard Falk, Elver has promoted
the writings of the world’s leading 9/11 conspiracy
theorist, accused Israel of “genocide”
and “Water Apartheid”, and
systematically blames Western society for the world’s
ills, accusing America and Europe of systemic Islamophobia
and racism. UN Watch summarized her failure to satisfy the
job’s minimum requirements here.
UN Watch has launched an
urgent online campaign appealing for the U.S. government to
take action tomorrow.
Yesterday, in an
aggressive letter from the Arab Group, the council
president was told in emphatic terms that “there
is only one appropriate candidate for the
position,” that “Professor Chinkin
remarkably fulfils the criteria,” and
“any deviation could set a dangerous precedent,
which we would want to avoid.”
Although Indonesia’s Makarim Wibisono had been widely reported by diplomats as the slated pick, in the end the Arab states, following Ramallah’s lead, only wanted Chinkin. A proven, pro-Palestinian legal campaigner, in their view, will be far more effective to promote their global lawfare and BDS agenda than a Muslim diplomat.
Chinkin was famously criticized
by fellow UN human rights expert Sir Nigel
Rodley and others for having failed to recuse
herself from the Goldstone inquiry despite having issued a
prior statement declaring Israel guilty on the very legal
question put before her commission.
Sir Nigel,
Chairperson of the UN Human Rights Committee and a fellow
English academic, criticized Chinkin’s failure to recuse
herself from the mission, saying “there was regrettably a
basis for questioning the appearance of bias” as a result
of her public letter.
“If such a statement were made by a member of a standing fact-finding body,” wrote Rodley, “it could be expected that such a member would move to recuse himself or herself from the hearing of the issues.”
Chinkin was also criticized by a larger group of academics assembled by Chatham House, which, in diplomatic but unmistakable language, rebuked her by emphasizing that ”fact-finding missions should avoid any perception of bias,” that its members should not “act in a way that would damage their impartiality,” and should “therefore exercise great care when writing or speaking on international disputes that could potentially be subject to an investigation.”
When Goldstone in 2011 famously retracted the core charge of the Goldstone Report — that Israel killed civilians on purpose — Chinkin joined with two others in attacking him.
Ends