Health Risk Map 2015: Revised country medical risk ratings
Health Risk Map 2015: Revised country medical risk ratings released
• China, India,
Indonesia, Russia reclassified
• Improved
ratings in some parts of Africa thanks to foreign investment
and new private hospitals
• New ‘Large
Rapidly Developing Countries’ category
introduced
International SOS has released Health Risk Map 2015, a tool to help organisations understand the medical risks in the markets in which they operate.
Now in its
sixth year, the Health Risk Map helps organisations with
staff and volunteers who travel overseas quickly identify if
greater consideration of the health risks to their employees
is required.
Multinationals, NGOs, schools,
universities, government departments and mining companies
rely on the annual Health Risk Map to help inform their risk
management and pre-travel processes.
The ratings are determined by a panel of International SOS Medical Directors and take into consideration a combination of factors including access to quality medical facilities, hygiene and sanitation, prevalence of infectious diseases and rates of accidents.
This year a new category has been introduced to recognise the vastly different quality of medical services in major cities compared to the rest of country in developing economies, which typically attract high numbers of business travellers. Countries include Brazil, China and India.
Doug Quarry, Medical Director, Medical Information
and Analysis at International SOS said:
“The analysis
from our medical experts presents a very interesting story
about private healthcare services in some African nations.
We have seen continued investment in a number of countries,
often from foreign investors, including those in the private
medical insurance market. It means citizens, overseas
workers and expatriates, have access to higher standard
hospital facilities.
We have to view these improvements in the context of the continent’s overall risks. Obviously, the ongoing Ebola outbreak highlights the challenges in existing healthcare systems. Nevertheless, these developments are a positive step for healthcare in Africa. And while we are still talking about relatively low numbers of new quality facilities, we may well see more improvements of this nature in the coming years.”
ENDS