Preparation for UN climate summit (COP22) heating up
Preparation for UN climate summit (COP22) heating
up. A Q&A to help Ministers before 18 October
‘pre-COP’ meeting
For Pacific Guardians | by Lealaiauloto
Aigaletaule’ale’a F. Tauafiafi
The countdown to the
UN climate summit called COP22 at Morocco starting 7
November is heating up.
Part of the preparations in order
to maximize the outcomes of COP22, includes ‘pre-COP meetings’ for government
Ministers, intended to clarify key issues before the 7
November conference. One will take place next week, 18-19
October in Marrakech.
To bring ministers up with the
play, the incoming Moroccan presidency and outgoing French
presidency prepared a handy Q&A for Ministers so they come
prepared to the pre-COP meeting.
Independent answers to
these question have been provided by the Climate Action
Network (CAN) – a worldwide network of over 700
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) working to promote
government and individual action to limit human-induced
climate change to ecologically sustainable levels.
The
answers are outlined below. Some liberty has been taken to
highlight areas of interest to Pacific audience. Such as the
mention of Tokelau’s intent to launch its Climate
Change Strategy at COP22.
MOBILISATION OF
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
1) What to
expect for the roadmap towards the US$100
billion?
Like all good financial tools and
plans, the roadmap needs to have clarity and predictability.
It needs to provide an accurate and detailed forward-looking
account of how the US$100 billion will be mobilised in
addition to the existing efforts being made.
This should
include the types of instruments, sources, channels, etc. as
well as public-private leverage ratios. The Climate Action
Network (CAN) through its newsletter ECO, has said it dozens
of times: greater clarity on financial support to mitigation
and adaptation will generate confidence in developing
country Parties.
It will also showcase the amount of
finance flowing in the coming years by 2020 which will help
developing countries integrate Nationally Determined Contributions
(NDCs) into their planning and implementation.
Of
particular note would be building on the OECD’s 2015
report on progress towards the US$100 billion goal. This
means grants should be reported at face value and present
net positive flows into developing countries.
2)
What are Parties’ intended announcements/initiatives at
the COP that would show support, action and
momentum?
COP22 should assess and highlight
pre-2020 ambition. That’s right, we never forget about
what needs to happen now – in particular, means of
implementation, the pledges made by countries within CP2 of
the Kyoto Protocol, countries’ Cancun pledges, the NAMA
registry, REDD+ and plenty of others.
This assessment
would show support, ambition and momentum in the context of
the facilitative dialogue technical track. Ideally, this
would be in the form of roundtable discussions amongst
experts, facilitated by the High-Level Champions with
representation of technical experts from UNFCCC
institutions. The discussions from the technical track
should be reflected in the form of a policymaker’s
summary.
[Pacific Guardians note: Tokelau is expected
to launch its Climate Change Strategy called LivC at
COP22]
STRENGTHENING ACTION [INCREASING
AMBITION]
3) How can the facilitative
dialogue on action and implementation help Parties identify
options to increase ambition through the implementation of
existing decisions?
Why take one track when we
can take two? This year’s facilitative dialogue should
follow a two-track approach: first, a technical track to
take stock of progress and identify implementation
gaps.
The high level track overseen by the presidency
should then provide the opportunity to discuss how the
recommendations from the technical track should be taken
forward. It should also provide the ministers with a
platform to make announcements and pledges towards greater
action as well as strengthening their own
commitments.
These discussions should then be reflected
in a chair’s summary to be forwarded to the COP for its
consideration. Said summary could be noted by the COP and
its intent reflected within decisions from COP22 as
well.
Overall, the two tracks make for a nice package to
increase ambition.
4) How can the Global Climate
Action Agenda and the work of the Champions be
strengthened?
All mitigation initiatives
associated with the UNFCCC should adhere to a set of strong,
guiding criteria to ensure positive impact and avoid
greenwashing.
Giving the UN stamp of approval to
greenwashers will undermine the UNFCCC’s credibility and
make the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5C more
difficult to achieve. The process to develop criteria should
be announced at COP22, and be facilitated by the
Champions.
RATIFICATION AND WHAT
NEXT
October started with a real bustle of
activity! This month, the Paris Agreement became one of the
most swiftly ratified international treaties in history as
it crossed the second of two thresholds required to enter
into force, which will now occur on 4 November
2016.
Expedited action by the European Union and
seven of its member states (Austria, France, Germany,
Hungary, Malta, Portugal and Slovakia) as well as Bolivia,
Canada and Nepal ensured that the global community sailed
past the Agreement’s emissions threshold.
Since the
Paris Agreement opened for signature on 22 April,
ratification has occurred at a breakneck speed. In just 5
short months, 73 countries representing nearly 57% of global
emissions have joined the Paris Agreement, signalling their
intent to continue the spirit of Paris and work together to
address climate change.
The Agreement further provides
that the first meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement
referred to as CMA1—we can never get enough
acronyms—will be held in conjunction with the next COP,
next month in Marrakech.
This will be significant for a
number of reasons.
CMA1 will be the first meeting of the
governing body, which has authority over all substantive,
procedural, administrative and operational matters. The
Agreement and accompanying decisions anticipate a number of
core decisions—including accounting guidelines, rules to
elaborate the transparency framework and modalities for the
global stocktake—to be adopted at CMA1. Due to the
unanticipated speed of entry into force, Parties still need
time to finalise these decisions.
Therefore it is very
important that CMA1 to agree a process to ensure adequate
time to negotiate these important technical details and be
inclusive for those countries that have not yet had the
opportunity to join the Agreement.
CAN doesn’t believe
that this time period should continue indefinitely though.
If the closure of CMA1 is suspended during COP22, Parties
should decide to have all rules developed by
2018.
[PACIFIC GUARDIANS NOTE
FROM EXPLAINER: No one expected the
Paris Agreement to come into force as early as it did. Until
the penultimate draft of the Paris text, there were no options to allow the deal to come
into force before 2020.
While the Paris Agreement
set the direction for future climate action, its guiding
rulebook still needs to be developed. In particular, a huge workload has been assigned to the
“Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement” (APA),
which was set up to prepare the deal for entry into
force.
Once the Paris Agreement goes into force,
discussions technically start taking place under the
“Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the
Parties to the Paris Agreement” (CMA). Thanks to the early
entry into force, this will now take place for the first
time in Marrakech in November, which is known as
COP22.
The problem is that only countries that
have ratified the agreement can take part in these
discussions. This has left many countries concerned that
they’ll be left out of important future discussions on the
technical side of the Paris Agreement.
The French
and Moroccan presidencies have released a document aiming to ease these
worries.
One option, they say, is to immediately
suspend the CMA and continue working on the rulebook in
Marrakech as though the agreement hasn’t come into force
— that is to say, with the inclusion of all countries,
whether they have ratified or not. The World Resources
Institute, a think-tank based in Washington DC, has detailed information about the options
available and how they could work.]
VARIETY
IS THE SPICE OF LIFE: EXTERNAL PROCESSES THAT
MATTER
As we approach the yearly Pre-COP and COP
feast, this time with a Moroccan flavour, here is how
working in other fora can strengthen ambition and action in
the UNFCCC. With ICAO, Montreal Protocol, G20, and not to
mention all of the synergies with the SDGs there is so much
more on the menu. In this brave new world of implementation
and global action, the emphasis must not only be on the
ingredients of the tajine, but also what you serve it with.
ECO has 5 serving suggestions:
A handful of HFCs:
Like giving up sugar, it’s hard to go cold
turkey on HFCs. However, ECO hopes for a Kigali special this
October that finally kicks the HFCs habit. All that’s
needed is Montreal Protocol Parties to adopt an ambitious
amendment to phase-down HFCs and improve energy efficiency.
The most scientific chefs estimate a phase down of these
potent greenhouse gases could avoid more than 100 billion
tonnes of CO2 equivalent by 2050 which is equal to about
0.5ºC of warming.
An ounce of
Aviation:
At its recently concluded 39th
Assembly in Montreal, the International Civil Aviation
Organisation has reached the world’s first agreement to
limit emissions from international aviation—a deal that
will be voluntary until 2027. While it does include a treat
or two, it also contains several less appetising
ingredients. ECO salutes the inclusion of language on double
counting of UNFCCC credits, but laments the missing language
on environmental integrity and the deletion of some language
on a long-term temperature goal in line with the Paris
Agreement. Without concerted action, aviation emissions
could make up over 20% of global emissions by 2050. Yet 2020
was supposed to be the year where the aviation sector began
carbon-neutral growth. Governments need to sign up to the
deal from its outset in 2021, not 2027. ICAO’s agreement
is a start, but without stronger leadership and action in
this sector, the achievement of the Paris goals will be in
peril.
A sprinkle of Shipping:
Often
overlooked, this important ingredient (predicted to account
for 17% of global emissions by 2050 under BAU) can turn a
mediocre dish into climate haute cuisine. At the end of
October, countries will meet in London at the International
Maritime Organisation to discuss whether the vital
ingredients will be added or not. For a five-star meal,
countries need to commit to defining the shipping sector’s
‘fair share’ contribution to mitigating climate change.
Shipping Ministers, the more you delay, the larger this fair
share will become!
A dollop of
G20:
Accounting for approximately 81% of global
greenhouse gas emissions, G20 countries add a lot of spice
to the dish. While the Chinese Presidency of the recent G20
Summit placed climate change firmly on the agenda, the
communiqué lacked any oomph in terms of concrete outcomes.
Now is the time for a timeline of when G20 countries will
finally get rid of those tasteless, unhealthy fossil fuel
subsidies, a commitment to develop long-term strategies, and
more robust climate language on infrastructure and finance.
ECO hopes that G20 countries will take domestic action to
ensure that the momentum and spirit of Paris continues and
is mainstreamed into the global agenda. The baton is passed
onto Germany as it takes up the 2017 G20 Presidency, so
let’s hope that when it comes to climate change, Germany
and its G20 sous-chefs cook up a feast to be proud
of.
Finally, stir in some
SDGs:
Several national policies are likely to
contribute to the goals of Agenda 2030 and the Paris
Agreement. Developing long-term strategies for sustainable
development and decarbonisation will allow countries to
fully enhance all flavours of the dish by strengthening
synergies between climate and development policymaking,
making successful outcomes in both processes more
likely.
While progress within the UNFCCC process is the
essential basis of our efforts to fight climate change, our
focus should not be so narrow that we ignore what is going
on around us. Rigorous efforts for streamlining and
coherence in important outside processes will be crucial to
ensure that our climate deal succeeds.
WHERE IS
THE VOICE OF PACIFIC SMALL ISLAND
STATES?
PACIFIC GUARDIANS NOTE: War on climate change: Is the Pacific ready
when the world’s plan of attack is put together in Morocco
next month? – still waiting on a promised response
from the Secretariat of the Pacific Environment Programme
(SPREP)
…