Pacific welcomes global climate agreement
Pacific welcomes global climate agreement. Urge
negotiators to focus on real enemy – ‘profit driven
systems’
For Pacific Guardians | by
Lealaiauloto Aigaletaule’ale’a F.
Tauafiafi
For Pacific negotiators this is the
moment of truth. The destination aimed for from 1992. They
are the officials in the moment. To ensure the region’s
priorities are not ignored, sidelined, diluted or omitted
from the important texts that will frame policies,
financing, activities and projects under the Paris Agreement
and its future accords. To remember that climate change is
ultimately a problem of dollars and cents across
generations.
Today, 5 November 2016, the
Paris Agreement entered into force.
The single global
voice calling for the world to move away from fossil fuels;
and limit average world temperature rise to “well below”
2.0degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial
times. The Agreement, pushed for by Pacific nations and
small island states for two decades, is the first planetary
step towards saving future generations from a world that
would be uninhabitable to humans.
Pacific islands, first
to see the sun each day welcomed the Paris Agreement. It brings hope to all of them on the front
lines of storm surges, disrupted rainfalls, rising sea
levels, floods and droughts, extreme weather events
increasing in frequency and intensity, greater food scarcity
and price insecurity; impacts resulting from human-induced
climate change.
Next week, Pacific climate negotiators
and the rest of the world will meet for two-weeks, at the UN
climate summit in Marrakech, Morocco [COP22] starting 7
November to iron out the details for implementing the Paris
Agreement.
For Pacific negotiators this is the moment
of truth. The moment the region and other small island
nations have been fighting for since 1992 in Rio de Janeiro
when the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
was adopted.
This is the destination aimed for from 1992.
This is the now and they must seize the moment.
They need
to go there armed to the maximum. They should have a number
of facts and forged clarity on positions key and essential
to ensure the Pacific voices and articulates its needs and
issues with substance and force. That it maximises its
position and call to action about the urgent needs of its
peoples.
That the region’s priorities are not ignored,
sidelined, diluted or omitted from the important texts that
will frame policies, financing, activities and projects
under the Agreement and its future accords.
The first
fact is that climate change is ultimately a problem of
dollars and cents across generations.
That even if our
global society stop emitting greenhouse gases (GHG) today,
or if the renewable sector takes the lead in powering the
global economy – it will not provide immediate
results..
The truth is this: even if all emmissions
stopped today, the world will still continue to warm and
with it, the growing environmental inequality that is
causing/leading to displacement, resource-competition, actual war, and watery graves for low-lying
islands.
That the benefits from today’s actions and
the outcomes of COP22 will not be realized until the coming
decades, even centuries in the form of fewer people dying
from heat waves, cities and islands not being
submerged by rising seas, farmers
dealing with reduced risk of megadroughts and indigenous
communities’ way of life, livelihoods, ancestral lands and
traditions protected from storm surges, sea-level rise,
extreme and more frequent weather events, displacement and
so forth.
WHO IS THE REAL CLIMATE CHANGE
ENEMY?
Secondly, there is the need for clarity
on “who is the real enemy?”. To put together solutions,
the real enemy needs to be identified.
The most recent International Panel on Climate Change
report notes that the poor and marginalized face greater
food scarcity and price insecurity, and the threat of
violent conflict connected to this instability.
In layman
terms, the first victims are suffering not just from changes
in the physical environment, but of impacts wrought by other
humans – those who leverage their social position to
displace wider costs and extract private benefits. The rich
humans living in rich nations whose lavish lifestyle is
powered by “cheap” fuel and other products of industry,
and where shareholders profit from such sales continues to
increase demand for more growth which end up growing higher carbon emissions.
Implicit in
this IPCC description is pointing the finger at the
environmental and human inequality and why climate change
increases the gap between rich and poor; and the
vulnerability index between the two.
“As the climate
changes, the rich can afford an increase in food prices.
They can ship in bottled water during droughts and relocate
businesses and homes when the seas rise. For those without
access to such privileges? Simply put, they have fewer
options. They end up paying the price for the extravagance
of the rich.
Throwing money and technology at the poor
and vulnerable is not the answer. Sure, greener technologies
can help, but solar panels won’t purify some of the
contaminated water lenses or reclaim precious land in
islands where some are only 10 square kilometers in
area.
It is fact that technology alone can’t address
the environmental injustice disproportionately confronting
minorities.
FOUND: THE REAL
ENEMY
Negotiators must embrace the fact that the
enemy is not the physical environment.
The enemy is the
unjust human ‘for profit systems’ that allow some to
gain at the expense of and risk to others – that is the
real enemy.
It means that Exxon, and entities like it,
are not the enemy.
Exxon’s deliberate actions to muddy
the climate science evidence was the worst
kind of behavior but it was one necessitated and demanded by
the private, exploitive ‘profit-driven systems’ it is
operating under.
It is this ‘profit-driven systems’
enemy that needs to be confronted and bested if the Paris
Agreement is to even have a slim chance at its
“aspirational goal” of limiting global temperature
warming to 1.5C above preindustrial times.
Otherwise,
Exxon and exploitive organizations like it, would remain
unconcerned with climate justice even if the world is
mobilized to mass produce solar panels and wind
turbines.
SOLUTION: TWO PRONGED – GREEN ENERGY
& PEOPLE POWER
This then comes up with a
two-pronged solution that can be championed by the Paris
Agreement, and the future amendments it will
birth.
First, move the world economy to be powered by
Green energy –the road to a zero-carbon future.
Second,
People Power.
Empower people and civil society to provide
control and direction of climate, natural resources and
energy policy. The Paris Agreement already has components
that enable democratic participation to redress past harms
and guide environmental goals of the future.
A ‘People
Power’ revolution would affirm everyone’s right to a
clean, healthy environment; and rebalance society’s
natural relationship with the environment that is currently
allowing some to profit by denying this right to
others.
This wider vision would allow true global
cooperation in which China, the United States and all high
emitters can work hand in hand in confronting global
environmental challenges and injustices rather than the
narrow focus on self interest – the basis of the
‘for-profit systems’. The lessons from the ‘Cold
War’ should provide guidance on how not to make the same
mistake twice.
In other words, climate change demands not
only a race to develop and deploy new energy technologies,
but a movement to democratize all forms of power — fossil
fuels, wind, solar, but most important, economic and
political power.
And that makes Marrakech a summit of
“hope”. For already written in the Paris Agreement are
basic elements to: (i) move and finance the world to a
decarbonized global economy and system; and (ii) democratic
capabilities to empower people to control and direct future
environmental goals that are fair and equitable to
all.
That is the challenge facing negotiators in
Marrakech over the next two weeks – leveraging hope to
establish a global Green Energy system; and a Power to the
People
movement.