International Meeting Could Open Up Ocean Mining, Drastically Undermining Ocean Health
Statement: Obscure International Body Could Open Floodgates for Deep Ocean Mining, Despite Opposition by Scientists, Governments, Companies and NGOs
Evidence Shows Ocean Mining Threatens Biodiversity, Climate, Fishing and More
Critics are sounding the alarm that an upcoming meeting of the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the international body that regulates and controls mining activities in the world’s ocean that lies beyond national jurisdictions, could push through ocean mining regulations in as little as two years.
Scientists, governments that are party to the ISA, businesses and NGOs have harshly criticized the meeting to take place in Kingston, Jamaica--and have even called for its delay due to the coronavirus pandemic. The two-week hybrid gathering starts on December 6.
Critics of ocean mining, citing a growing body of evidence, have expressed concern that too little is known about the climate, biodiversity, fishing and other impacts of extracting minerals from the ocean floor to let the regulations move forward. A recent study, for example, showed that areas earmarked for ocean mining overlap with tuna and other lucrative fishing areas critical to local and global food security.
Though the ISA meeting has flown under the radar, its massive global significance is reflected in increasing opposition to the meeting, in particular, and ocean mining in general.
- Stern letters issued by the Deep Ocean Stewardship Initiative, a group of Africa nations party to ISA, and members of the body’s Latin America and Caribbean group have called on ISA to delay any decision about ocean mining,
- A global group of more than 600 leading ocean scientists have now signed a scientist statement calling for a moratorium, and members of the IUCN World Conservation Congress voted against ocean mining.
- Several businesses have also supported a moratorium on ocean mining. These include BMW, Volvo, Samsung, and Philips, which recently signed a Business Statement Supporting a Moratorium on Deep Seabed Mining. This week three more businesses, Volkswagen Group, Triodos Bank and Patagonia, joined the statement. Additionally, in a report on responsible sourcing, Microsoft states: “Microsoft has established a moratorium on using minerals sourced through deep seabed mining until the proper research and scientific studies have been completed.”
- NGOs and civil society are also sounding the alarm around ocean mining.
Dr.
Douglas McCauley, a professor at the University of
California, Santa Barbara, said:
“Decisions
made at the International Seabed Authority may shape the
next few centuries of ocean health. If ocean mining is
green-lighted it could let the genie out of the bottle and
significantly threaten important species, inflict
irreversible damage to sensitive ocean habitats, source
toxins into seafood via contaminated water plumes and
disrupt key carbon stores in the deep ocean critical to
combating climate change. Those headed to these meetings in
Jamaica must know that hundreds of ocean scientists have
warned that more research is desperately needed to
understand these impacts before mining is allowed to begin.
It’s remarkable that the future of such a vast area of our
ocean will be decided in a meeting that almost nobody knows
is happening.”
Dr. Diva Amon, a deep-sea
biologist and co-lead of the Deep-Ocean Stewardship
Initiative's Minerals Working Group,
said:
“Will we have the science needed to
comprehensively understand deep-sea environments and
deep-seabed mining’s likely impacts within the next two
years? Unfortunately not. Despite an increase in deep-sea
research, publicly available scientific knowledge
comprehensive enough to enable evidence-based
decision-making regarding environmental management in
regions where exploration contracts have been granted by the
International Seabed Authority does not yet exist. Closing
these scientific gaps is a monumental task that requires
clear direction, substantial resources, robust coordination
and collaboration, and most importantly TIME, likely on the
scale of decades."
Sian Owen, Deep Sea
Conservation Coalition, said:
“The adoption
of Motion 069 at the IUCN World Conservation Congress in
September is a ringing endorsement of the need for caution
and respect in managing our ocean. Governments and civil
society alike voted overwhelmingly in favour of an
indefinite moratorium on deep-sea mining. This is a signal
that the world is simply not ready to permit a massive new
industrial frontier in one of our planet's last wildernesses
before we have even fully understood the wonder and the many
benefits to humankind of a healthy deep
ocean.”
Joachim Claudet, a researcher at
the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) in
Paris, France, said:
“The deep-sea
encompasses some of the most vulnerable ecosystems on earth,
with recovery time, if any, longer than anywhere else.
Mining would alter these ecosystems in ways that are in full
contradiction with the sustainable pathways our societies
should take to ensure peoples’ well being in the long
term.”